J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38(06): 481-490
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740121
Original Article

Abdominal Wall Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Scoping Review

1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Eric Santamaría
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
,
Pedro Ciudad
4   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Burn Surgery, Arzobispo Loayza National Hospital, Lima, Peru
,
Antonio J. Forte
5   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
,
Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro
6   Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepatobiliaty Surgery, Department of Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Jonathan I. Leckenby
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Howard N. Langstein
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
,
Oscar J. Manrique
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Abdominal wall vascularized composite allotransplantation (AW-VCA) is a novel reconstructive technique used for large abdominal wall defects in combination with intestinal transplantation (ITx) or multivisceral abdominal transplantation (MVTx). Since the introduction of this procedure, several studies have been published reporting their experience. This study aims to present a scoping review looking at all available evidence-based medicine information to understand the most current surgical techniques and clinical outcomes.

Methods This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews checklist. A comprehensive research strategy of several databases was conducted.

Results A total of 31 studies were included in this review, which comprised animal, cadaveric, and human studies. In human studies, four surgical techniques with high flap survival rates and low complication rates were found. In cadaveric studies, it was shown that the use of iliofemoral cuff-based flaps provided adequate tissue perfusion to the abdominal wall graft. Also, the use of thoracolumbar nerves have been described to provide functionality to the AW-VCA and prevent long-term muscle atrophy.

Conclusion AW-VCA is a safe and efficient alternative for patients with large and complex abdominal wall defects. The future holds a promising evolution of a functional AW-VCA, though surgeons must face and overcome the challenge of distorted anatomy frequently present in this population. Forthcoming studies with a better level of evidence are required to evaluate functionality and differences between surgical techniques.

Ethical Statement

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.


Author Contributions

Conception and design were done by Oscar J. Manrique, Valeria P. Bustos, and Joseph M. Escandón. Administrative support was provided by Oscar J. Manrique. Provision of study materials or patients, collection and assembly of data, and data analysis and interpretation were done by Oscar J. Manrique, Valeria P. Bustos, and Joseph M. Escandón. All the authors were involved in writing the manuscript and gave approval to the final manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 26 April 2021

Accepted: 26 September 2021

Article published online:
14 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Zanfi C, Cescon M, Lauro A. et al. Incidence and management of abdominal closure-related complications in adult intestinal transplantation. Transplantation 2008; 85 (11) 1607-1609
  • 2 Levi DM, Tzakis AG, Kato T. et al. Transplantation of the abdominal wall. Lancet 2003; 361 (9376): 2173-2176
  • 3 Moffett JM, Gedalia U, Xue AS, Heller L. Intraabdominal challenges affecting abdominal wall reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2012; 26 (01) 8-11
  • 4 Barnes J, Issa F, Vrakas G, Friend P, Giele H. The abdominal wall transplant as a sentinel skin graft. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2016; 21 (05) 536-540
  • 5 Patel NG, Ratanshi I, Buchel EW. The best of abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 113e-136e
  • 6 Atia A, Hollins A, Erdmann RF. et al. Synchronous abdominal wall and small-bowel transplantation: a 1-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (07) e2995
  • 7 Atia A, Hollins A, Shammas R. et al. Surgical techniques for revascularization in abdominal wall transplantation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 522-527
  • 8 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W. et al. PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169 (07) 467-473
  • 9 Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid Based Med 2018; 23 (02) 60-63
  • 10 Wilke J, Krause F, Niederer D. et al. Appraising the methodological quality of cadaveric studies: validation of the QUACS scale. J Anat 2015; 226 (05) 440-446
  • 11 Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RBM, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW. SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14 (01) 43
  • 12 Hollenbeck ST, Senghaas A, Turley R. et al. The extended abdominal wall flap for transplantation. Transplant Proc 2011; 43 (05) 1701-1705
  • 13 Singh DP, Mavrophilipos VD, Zapora JA. et al. Novel technique for innervated abdominal wall vascularized composite allotransplantation: a separation of components approach. Eplasty 2014; 14: e34
  • 14 Light D, Kundu N, Djohan R. et al. Total abdominal wall transplantation: an anatomical study and classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (06) 1466-1473
  • 15 Broyles JM, Berli J, Tuffaha SH. et al. Functional abdominal wall reconstruction using an innervated abdominal wall vascularized composite tissue allograft: a cadaveric study and review of the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (01) 39-44
  • 16 Ramirez AE, Cheng H-Y, Lao WW. et al. A novel rat full-thickness hemi-abdominal wall/hindlimb osteomyocutaneous combined flap: influence of allograft mass and vascularized bone marrow content on vascularized composite allograft survival. Transpl Int 2014; 27 (09) 977-986
  • 17 Nasir S, Bozkurt M, Klimczak A, Siemionow M. Large antigenic skin load in total abdominal wall transplants permits chimerism induction. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (05) 572-579
  • 18 Jin J, Williams CP, Soltanian H. et al. Use of abdominal wall allotransplantation as an alternative for the management of end stage abdominal wall failure in a porcine model. J Surg Res 2010; 162 (02) 314-320
  • 19 Yang J, Erdmann D, Chang JC. et al. A model of sequential heart and composite tissue allotransplant in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (01) 80-86
  • 20 Quigley MA, Fletcher DR, Zhang W, Nguyen VT. Development of a reliable model of total abdominal wall transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (04) 988-994
  • 21 Lao WW, Wang Y-L, Ramirez AE, Cheng H-Y, Wei F-C. A new rat model for orthotopic abdominal wall allotransplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014; 2 (04) e136
  • 22 Grosu-Bularda A, Zamfirescu D, Stefanescu A, Stoica M, Lazarescu L, Lascar I. Developing an optimal experimental model for immunological studies in VCA: vascularized composite allotransplants based on femoral vessels in rats. J Transl Med Res 2016; 21 (02) 131
  • 23 Tzakis AG, Tryphonopoulos P, Kato T. et al. Intestinal transplantation: advances in immunosuppression and surgical techniques. Transplant Proc 2003; 35 (05) 1925-1926
  • 24 Selvaggi G, Levi DM, Kato T. et al. Expanded use of transplantation techniques: abdominal wall transplantation and intestinal autotransplantation. Transplant Proc 2004; 36 (05) 1561-1563
  • 25 Bejarano PA, Levi D, Nassiri M. et al. The pathology of full-thickness cadaver skin transplant for large abdominal defects: a proposed grading system for skin allograft acute rejection. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28 (05) 670-675
  • 26 Cipriani R, Contedini F, Santoli M. et al. Abdominal wall transplantation with microsurgical technique. Am J Transplant 2007; 7 (05) 1304-1307
  • 27 Lauro A, Dazzi A, Ercolani G. et al. Results of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation in adult patients: Italian experience. Transplant Proc 2006; 38 (06) 1696-1698
  • 28 Lauro A, Zanfi C, Ercolani G. et al. Twenty-five consecutive isolated intestinal transplants in adult patients: a five-yr clinical experience. Clin Transplant 2007; 21 (02) 177-185
  • 29 Lauro A, Arpinati M, Zanfi C. et al. Extracorporeal photopheresis for chronic GVHD: case report after adult bowel-abdominal wall transplantation. Transplantation 2013; 96 (02) e9-e10
  • 30 Allin BSR, Ceresa CDL, Issa F. et al. A single center experience of abdominal wall graft rejection after combined intestinal and abdominal wall transplantation. Am J Transplant 2013; 13 (08) 2211-2215
  • 31 Mannu GS, Vaidya A. An interesting rash following bowel and abdominal wall transplantation. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013: bcr2013200951
  • 32 Giele H, Bendon C, Reddy S. et al. Remote revascularization of abdominal wall transplants using the forearm. Am J Transplant 2014; 14 (06) 1410-1416
  • 33 Mannu GS, Vaidya A. Graft versus host disease following small bowel and abdominal wall transplantation. BMJ Case Rep 2014; bcr2014205983
  • 34 Mannu GS, Vaidya A. Thermal trauma to abdominal wall vascularised composite allotransplant. BMJ Case Rep 2014; bcr2013202692
  • 35 Gerlach UA, Vrakas G, Sawitzki B. et al. Abdominal wall transplantation: skin as a sentinel marker for rejection. Am J Transplant 2016; 16 (06) 1892-1900
  • 36 Weissenbacher A, Vrakas G, Chen M. et al. De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies after combined intestinal and vascularized composite allotransplantation: a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2018; 31 (04) 398-407
  • 37 Erdmann D, Atia A, Phillips BT. et al. Small bowel and abdominal wall transplantation: a novel technique for synchronous revascularization. Am J Transplant 2019; 19 (07) 2122-2126
  • 38 Trentadue G, Kats-Ugurlu G, Blokzijl T. et al. Safe and successful treatment of acute cellular rejection of an intestine and abdominal wall transplant with vedolizumab. Transplant Direct 2020; 6 (02) e527
  • 39 Haveman JW, Tempelman TM, Hofker HS, Khoe PC, Dijkstra G, Werker PM. Eerste dunnedarm-buikwandtransplantatie in Nederland. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2016; 160 (16) A9788
  • 40 ClinicalTrials.gov. Abdominal Wall Transplant. Accessed December 23, 2020 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03310905?cond=abdominal+wall+transplant&draw=2&rank=1
  • 41 Kawai T, Cosimi AB, Spitzer TR. et al. HLA-mismatched renal transplantation without maintenance immunosuppression. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (04) 353-361
  • 42 Scandling JD, Busque S, Dejbakhsh-Jones S. et al. Tolerance and chimerism after renal and hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (04) 362-368
  • 43 Barth RN, Rodriguez ED, Mundinger GS. et al. Vascularized bone marrow-based immunosuppression inhibits rejection of vascularized composite allografts in nonhuman primates. Am J Transplant 2011; 11 (07) 1407-1416
  • 44 Roubaud MS, Baumann DP. Flap reconstruction of the abdominal wall. Semin Plast Surg 2018; 32 (03) 133-140
  • 45 Kuo Y-R, Kuo M-H, Lutz BS. et al. One-stage reconstruction of large midline abdominal wall defects using a composite free anterolateral thigh flap with vascularized fascia lata. Ann Surg 2004; 239 (03) 352-358
  • 46 Purnell CA, Lewis KC, Mioton LM. et al. Donor-site morbidity of medial and lateral thigh-based flaps: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (11) e1012
  • 47 Lutz BS, Khawaja S, Ingianni G. Donor site morbidity after rectus abdominis muscle flaps. Eur J Plast Surg 1997; 20 (04) 173-180
  • 48 Lee K-T, Mun G-H. A systematic review of functional donor-site morbidity after latissimus dorsi muscle transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (02) 303-314
  • 49 Postalcioglu M, Kaze AD, Byun BC. et al. Association of cold ischemia time with acute renal transplant rejection. Transplantation 2018; 102 (07) 1188-1194
  • 50 Debout A, Foucher Y, Trébern-Launay K. et al. Each additional hour of cold ischemia time significantly increases the risk of graft failure and mortality following renal transplantation. Kidney Int 2015; 87 (02) 343-349
  • 51 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000097 DOI: 10.1371/journal. pmed1000097.