Effect of Electronic Health Record Reminders for Routine Immunizations and Immunizations Needed for Chronic Medical Conditions

Abstract

Background Immunization reminders in electronic health records (EHR) provide clinical decision support (CDS) that can reduce missed immunization opportunities. Little is known about using CDS rules from a regional immunization information system (IIS) to power local EHR immunization reminders.

Objective This study aimed to assess the impact of EHR reminders using regional IIS CDS-provided rules on receipt of immunizations in a low-income, urban population for both routine immunizations and those recommended for patients with chronic medical conditions (CMCs).

Methods We built an EHR-based immunization reminder using the open-source resource used by the New York City IIS in which we overlaid logic regarding immunizations needed for CMCs. Using a randomized cluster-cross-over pragmatic clinical trial in four academic-affiliated clinics, we compared captured immunization opportunities during patient visits when the reminder was “on” versus “off” for the primary immunization series, school-age boosters, and adolescents. We also assessed coverage of CMC-specific immunizations. Up-to-date immunization was measured by end of quarter. Rates were compared using chi square tests.

Results Overall, 15,343 unique patients were seen for 26,647 visits. The alert significantly impacted captured opportunities to complete the primary series in both well-child and acute care visits (57.6% on vs. 54.3% off, p = 0.001, and 15.3% on vs. 10.1% off, p = 0.02, respectively), among most age groups, and several immunization types. Captured opportunities for CMC-specific immunizations remained low regardless of alert status. The alert did not have an effect on up-to-date immunization overall (89.1 vs. 88.3%).

Conclusion CDS in this population improved captured immunization opportunities. Baseline high rates may have blunted an up-to-date population effect. Converting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) rules to generate sufficiently sensitive and specific alerts for CMC-specific immunizations proved challenging, and the alert did not have an impact on CMC-specific immunizations, potentially highlighting need for more work in this area.

Keywords

clinical decision support - graphical user interface - immunization information system - CMC-specific immunizations

Note

This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02710318—Synchronized Immunization NotifiCations (SINC).

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed and approved by the Columbia University Irving Medical Center Institutional Review Board.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 30. März 2021

Angenommen: 05. Oktober 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Dezember 2021

• References

• 1 National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2018. Accessed February 19, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus18.pdf
• 2 Hofstetter AM, LaRussa P, Rosenthal SL. Vaccination of adolescents with chronic medical conditions: Special considerations and strategies for enhancing uptake. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2015; 11 (11) 2571-2581
• 3 Genies MC, Lopez SM, Schenk K. et al. Pediatric hospitalizations: are we missing an opportunity to immunize?. Hosp Pediatr 2019; 9 (09) 673-680
• 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and mortality weekly report (MMWR). Accessed February 19, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6001a3.htm
• 5 Ernst KD. Electronic alerts improve immunization rates in two-month-old premature infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (01) 206-213
• 6 Stockwell MS, Natarajan K, Ramakrishnan R. et al. Immunization data exchange with electronic health records. Pediatrics 2016; 137 (06) e20154335
• 7 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ecommended child and adolescent immunization schedule for ages 18 years or younger. Accessed February 21, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf
• 8 Arzt NH. Clinical Decision Support for Immunizations (CDSi): A Comprehensive, Collaborative Strategy. Biomed Inform Insights 2016; 8 (Suppl. 02) 1-13 DOI: 10.4137/BII.S40204.
• 9 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About immunization information systems. Accessed on February 19, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/about.html
• 10 Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program–Stage 3. Accessed on March 2, 2020 at: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/Stage3_Rule.pdf
• 11 Default immunization schedule. Accessed on June 5, 2020 at: https://cdsframework.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ICE/pages/14352468/Default+Immunization+Schedule
• 12 Stockwell MS, Catallozzi M, Camargo S. et al. Registry-linked electronic influenza vaccine provider reminders: a cluster-crossover trial. Pediatrics 2015; 135 (01) e75-e82
• 13 Bae J, Ford EW, Wu S, Huerta T. Electronic reminder's role in promoting human papillomavirus vaccine use. Am J Manag Care 2017; 23 (11) e353-e359
• 14 Ruffin IV MT, Plegue MA, Rockwell PG, Young AP, Patel DA, Yeazel MW. Impact of an electronic health record (EHR) reminder on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine initiation and timely completion. J Am Board Fam Med 2015; 28 (03) 324-333
• 15 Ledwich LJ, Harrington TM, Ayoub WT, Sartorius JA, Newman ED. Improved influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in rheumatology patients taking immunosuppressants using an electronic health record best practice alert. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61 (11) 1505-1510
• 16 Loo TS, Davis RB, Lipsitz LA. et al. Electronic medical record reminders and panel management to improve primary care of elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171 (17) 1552-1558
• 17 Castillo EM, Chan TC, Tolia VM. et al. Effect of a computerized alert on emergency department hepatitis a vaccination in homeless patients during a large regional outbreak. J Emerg Med 2018; 55 (06) 764-768
• 18 Patel MS, Volpp KG, Small DS. et al. Using active choice within the electronic health record to increase influenza vaccination rates. J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32 (07) 790-795
• 19 Au L, Oster A, Yeh GH, Magno J, Paek HM. Utilizing an electronic health record system to improve vaccination coverage in children. Appl Clin Inform 2010; 1 (03) 221-231
• 20 Park SK, Holschneider CH, Chen J, Saleeby E, Singhal R. Success of an EMR-driven postpartum intervention to improve HPV vaccination rates. J Community Health 2020; 45 (03) 446-451
• 21 Martin S, Warner EL, Kirchhoff AC, Mooney R, Martel L, Kepka D. An electronic medical record alert intervention to improve HPV vaccination among eligible male college students at a university student health center. J Community Health 2018; 43 (04) 756-760
• 22 Fiks AG, Grundmeier RW, Biggs LM, Localio AR, Alessandrini EA. Impact of clinical alerts within an electronic health record on routine childhood immunization in an urban pediatric population. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (04) 707-714
• 23 Mayne SL, duRivage NE, Feemster KA, Localio AR, Grundmeier RW, Fiks AG. Effect of decision support on missed opportunities for human papillomavirus vaccination. Am J Prev Med 2014; 47 (06) 734-744
• 24 Morgan JL, Baggari SR, Chung W, Ritch J, McIntire DD, Sheffield JS. Association of a best-practice alert and prenatal administration with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccination rates. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126 (02) 333-337
• 25 Contraindications and Precautions: General Best Practice Guidelines for Immunization: Best Practices Guidance of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Accessed February 23, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/contraindications.html
• 26 Dubé E, Laberge C, Guay M, Bramadat P, Roy R, Bettinger J. Vaccine hesitancy: an overview. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2013; 9 (08) 1763-1773
• 27 Gilkey MB, Calo WA, Moss JL, Shah PD, Marciniak MW, Brewer NT. Provider communication and HPV vaccination: The impact of recommendation quality. Vaccine 2016; 34 (09) 1187-1192
• 28 Rickert VI, Rehm SJ, Aalsma MC, Zimet GD. The role of parental attitudes and provider discussions in uptake of adolescent vaccines. Vaccine 2015; 33 (05) 642-647
• 29 Bratic JS, Cunningham RM, Belleza-Bascon B, Watson SK, Guffey D, Boom JA. Longitudinal evaluation of clinical decision support to improve influenza vaccine uptake in an integrated pediatric health care delivery system, Houston, Texas. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (05) 944-951
• 30 Malone K, Clark S, Palmer JA. et al. A quality improvement initiative to increase pneumococcal vaccination coverage among children after kidney transplant. Pediatr Transplant 2016; 20 (06) 783-789
• 31 Bhatt A, Hort S, Gelb DJ, MacKenzie T, Lansigan F. Customized electronic alerts to boost pneumococcal vaccinations in high risk cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: e18227-e18227
• 32 Dombkowski KJ, Harrington LB, Dong S, Clark SJ. Seasonal influenza vaccination reminders for children with high-risk conditions: a registry-based randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 2012; 42 (01) 71-75
• 33 Booth C, Inusa B, Obaro SK. Infection in sickle cell disease: a review. Int J Infect Dis 2010; 14 (01) e2-e12