Semin intervent Radiol 2021; 38(05): 560-564
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739159
Review Article

Understanding the Basics of Commonly Used Wires in Interventional Radiology

Mithil B. Pandhi
1   Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Health, Chicago, Illinois
,
Ravi Tyagi
2   University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Divya Surabhi
2   University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
,
Ketan Y. Shah
1   Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Health, Chicago, Illinois
› Institutsangaben
Funding This study was not supported by any funding.

Abstract

A wide variety of wires are available for use in interventional radiology, with wires demonstrating differences in construction, diameter, length, coating, shape, and taper. It is crucial to understand the difference in characteristics between these wires to select the most effective and safe wire for the intended purpose when undertaking a procedure. This article reviews the qualities and functions of different types of wires to aid in this decision-making process.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Kaufman JA, Lee MJ. Vascular and Interventional Radiology: The Requisites. 2nd ed.. Saunders; 2013: 25-55
  • 2 Mauro MA. Image-guided interventions. Expert Radiology Series. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2014: e15-e23
  • 3 Schröder Jr. Peripheral Vascular Interventions: An Illustrated Manual. New York: Thieme; 2013: 7-41
  • 4 Kido DK, King PD, Manzione JV, Simon JH. The role of catheters and guidewires in the production of angiographic thromboembolic complications. Invest Radiol 1988; 23 (Suppl 2): S359-S365
  • 5 Lee KH, Han JK, Byun Y. et al. Heparin-coated angiographic catheters: an in vivo comparison of three coating methods with different heparin release profiles. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2004; 27 (05) 507-511
  • 6 Raininko R, Söder H. Clot formation in angiographic catheters–an in vitro comparative study. Effects of heparin and protein coating of the catheter. Acta Radiol 1993; 34 (01) 78-82
  • 7 Huang SY, Engstrom BI, Lungren MP, Kim CY. Management of dysfunctional catheters and tubes inserted by interventional radiology. Semin Intervent Radiol 2015; 32 (02) 67-77
  • 8 Leach KR, Kurisu Y, Carlson JE. et al. Thrombogenicity of hydrophilically coated guide wires and catheters. Radiology 1990; 175 (03) 675-677
  • 9 Rosen LE, Singh RI, Mahon B. Myocardial hydrophilic polymer emboli following cardiac catheterization: a case report and literature review. Cardiovasc Pathol 2014; 23 (03) 175-177
  • 10 Grundeken MJ, Li X, Kurpershoek CE. et al. Distal embolization of hydrophilic-coating material from coronary guidewires after percutaneous coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8 (02) e001816
  • 11 Nakao N, Miura K, Takayasu Y, Uchida H. Tip-deflecting wire for percutaneous transhepatic portography. Radiology 1982; 143 (01) 258
  • 12 Sista AK, Vedantham S, Kaufman JA, Madoff DC. Endovascular interventions for acute and chronic lower extremity deep venous disease: state of the art. Radiology 2015; 276 (01) 31-53
  • 13 Patterson RB, Fowl RJ, Lubbers DJ, Vu DN, Kempczinski RF. Repositioning of partially dislodged Greenfield filters from the right atrium by use of a tip deflection wire. J Vasc Surg 1990; 12 (01) 70-72
  • 14 Nemcek Jr AA, Vogelzang RL. Modified use of the tip-deflecting wire in manipulation of foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149 (04) 777-779
  • 15 Morris DC, Scott IR, Jamieson WR. Pacemaker electrode repositioning using the loop-snare technique. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989; 12 (06) 996-999