Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2021; 13(02): e144-e150
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735952
Research Article

Applicant Perceptions Regarding the 2020 to 2021 Virtual Ophthalmology Residency Interview and Match Season

Saumya M. Shah
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Andrew J. Barkmeier
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Lauren A. Dalvin
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Andrea A. Tooley
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has significantly impacted medical education, notably the mandate for all residency programs to implement virtual (rather than in-person) residency interviews. Understanding residency applicants' perceptions and approach to this novel virtual interview season will be beneficial as potential future interview formats are considered.

Objective The aim of this study was to examine perceptions of the 2020 to 2021 ophthalmology residency match applicants regarding the virtual interview season prior to the start of the interview season.

Patients and Methods Ophthalmology residency applicants during the 2020 to 2021 cycle were invited to complete the survey between October 20 and 29, 2020. Respondent demographic information, perceived importance of various application details in a normal versus virtual interview season, strengths and limitations of virtual interviews, and preferences for optimal virtual interview format were obtained.

Results There were 337 survey respondents, with at least 50% of the survey completed by 190 applicants (56%). Of these, 73% of respondents applied to more than 60 ophthalmology residency programs, and 78% felt that the evaluation of candidates would be impacted by the virtual interview format. Regardless of interview format, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score and letters of recommendation were perceived to be the two most important factors related to matching at an applicant's top ranked programs. The primary limitation of a virtual interview season was the inability to experience a program's culture in person, while largest strength was cost savings.

Conclusion The ophthalmology residency match is a competitive process made potentially more complex by a novel virtual interview format. A detailed postcycle analysis will be important to optimize future interview seasons.

Keywords

virtual interviews - COVID-19 - residency - medical education - interviews - residency application - ophthalmology

Authors' Contributions

S.M.S. involved in conceptualization, data curation, investigation, visualization, and writing the manuscript. L.A.D. helped in conceptualization, reviewing, and editing. A.J.B. supported in visualization, reviewing, and editing. A.A.T. contributed in supervision, reviewing, and editing.




Publication History

Received: 10 March 2021

Accepted: 22 June 2021

Article published online:
10 November 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Ferrel MN, Ryan JJ. The impact of COVID-19 on medical education. Cureus 2020; 12 (03) e7492
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lucey CR, Johnston SC. The transformational effects of COVID-19 on medical education. JAMA 2020; 324 (11) 1033-1034
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Quillen DA, Siatkowski RM, Feldon S. COVID-19 and the ophthalmology match. Ophthalmology 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.012.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hammoud MM, Standiford T, Carmody JB. Potential implications of COVID-19 for the 2020-2021 residency application cycle. JAMA 2020; 324 (01) 29-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Xie DX, Hillel AT, Ward BK. Otolaryngology residency match during the COVID-19 pandemic: what happens next?. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 146 (08) 687-688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gabrielson AT, Kohn TP, Clifton MM. COVID-19 and the urology match: perspectives and a call to action. J Urol 2020; 204 (01) 17-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Duong AT, Van Tassel SH, Alzaga Fernandez AG. et al. Medical education and path to residency in ophthalmology in the COVID-19 era: perspective from medical student educators. Ophthalmology 2020; 127 (11) e95-e98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. SFMatch. Ophthalmology residency match summary report 2021. Accessed 2021 at: https://www.sfmatch.org/PDFFilesDisplay/Ophthalmology_Residency_Stats_2020.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Siatkowski RM, Mian SI, Culican SM. et al; Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. Probability of success in the ophthalmology residency match: three-year outcomes analysis of san francisco matching program data. J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10 (01) e150-e157
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Behunin N, Hill C, Lotpifour M. The ophthalmology residency program director survey: Applicant qualities affecting the invitation to interview and rank position. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58(08):
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Grubbs Jr JR, Mian SI. Advising students interested in ophthalmology: a summary of the evidence. Ophthalmology 2016; 123 (07) 1406-1410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wendt S, Abdullah Z, Barrett S. et al. A virtual COVID-19 ophthalmology rotation. Surv Ophthalmol 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.10.001.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Davis MG, Haas MRC, Gottlieb M, House JB, Huang RD, Hopson LR. Zooming in versus flying out: virtual residency interviews in the era of COVID-19. Coates WC, ed. AEM Educ Train. 2020; 4 (04) 443-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shah SK, Arora S, Skipper B, Kalishman S, Timm TC, Smith AY. Randomized evaluation of a web based interview process for urology resident selection. J Urol 2012; 187 (04) 1380-1384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Vadi MG, Malkin MR, Lenart J, Stier GR, Gatling JW, Applegate II RL. Comparison of web-based and face-to-face interviews for application to an anesthesiology training program: a pilot study. Int J Med Educ 2016; 7: 102-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Daram SR, Wu R, Tang SJ. Interview from anywhere: feasibility and utility of web-based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109 (02) 155-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pasadhika S, Altenbernd T, Ober RR, Harvey EM, Miller JM. Residency interview video conferencing. Ophthalmology 2012; 119 (02) 426-426.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Day RW, Taylor BM, Bednarski BK. et al. Virtual interviews for surgical training program applicants during COVID-19: lessons learned and recommendations. Ann Surg 2020; 272 (02) e144-e147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Molina G, Mehtsun WT, Qadan M, Hause KC, Raut CP, Fairweather M. Virtual interviews for the complex general surgical oncology fellowship: the Dana-Farber/partners experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (09) 3103-3106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vining CC, Eng OS, Hogg ME. et al. Virtual surgical fellowship recruitment during covid-19 and its implications for resident/fellow recruitment in the future. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27 (Suppl. 03) 911-915
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Venincasa MJ, Cai LZ, Gedde SJ, Uhler T, Sridhar J. Current applicant perceptions of the ophthalmology residency match. JAMA Ophthalmol 2020; 138 (05) 460-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Moore DB. Not a cheap investment: estimating the cost of the 2017 to 2018 ophthalmology residency match to the applicant and program. J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10: 158-162
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar