CC BY 4.0 · Surg J (N Y) 2021; 07(04): e314-e318
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735899
Research Article

Paracetamol versus Paracetamol Plus Ondansetron on Acute Postoperative Pain

Mohamad Aryafar
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
,
Mahnaz Narimani Zamanabadi
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
,
Kourosh Farazmehr
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
,
Giti Dehghanmanshadi
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
,
Sepideh Davoodinejad
2   Student of Research Committee, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
,
Farshid Gholami
1   Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

This study was performed to determine the comparative efficacy of paracetamol alone versus paracetamol plus ondansetron on acute postoperative pain after abdominal surgeries in Azad University hospitals in 2017 and 2019. In this randomized clinical trial, 62 consecutive patients under abdominal surgeries, were randomly divided into two groups, group 1 patient who received paracetamol alone 1 gram and group 2 patient who received paracetamol 1 gram plus 4 mg ondansetron and the pain severities were determined and compared between groups at recovery and after 4 and 24 hours. The results of this study revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between two groups for the postoperative pain severity and analgesic use (p> 0.05). It may be concluded that addition of ondansetron to paracetamol would not result in further postoperative pain reduction and additive use of this drug is not recommended.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Board at the Azad University of Medical Sciences. (IR.IAU.TMU.REC.1395.260) on November 23, 2018 and was in accordance with the Helsinki principles.


Authors' Contribution

M.A. and F.G. conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. M.N. and K.F. designed the data collection instruments, collected data, carried out the initial analyses, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. G.D. and S.D. coordinated and supervised data collection, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 03 September 2019

Accepted: 26 July 2021

Article published online:
15 December 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Mann E, Carr E. Pain management. Foundation studies for caring: using student-centred learning. Journal of Pain Management 2018; 10: 259
  • 2 Shang AB, Gan TJ. Optimising postoperative pain management in the ambulatory patient. Drugs 2003; 63 (09) 855-867
  • 3 Beiranvand S, Moradkhani MR. Bupivacaine versus liposomal bupivacaine for pain control. Drug Res (Stuttg) 2018; 68 (07) 365-369
  • 4 Beiranvand S, Karimi A, Vahabi S, Amin-Bidokhti A. Comparison of the mean minimum dose of bolus oxytocin for proper uterine contraction during cesarean section. Curr Clin Pharmacol 2019; 14 (03) 208-213
  • 5 Gramke H-F, de Rijke JM, van Kleef M. et al. The prevalence of postoperative pain in a cross-sectional group of patients after day-case surgery in a university hospital. Clin J Pain 2007; 23 (06) 543-548
  • 6 Moradkhani MR, Karimi A, Zarei Z, Vahabi S. The relationship between the phases of the menstrual cycle on the incidence and severity of headache after spinal anesthesia. Surg J (NY) 2019; 5 (03) e126-e130
  • 7 Samin J, Collange O, Pourtalès MC, Ravaz T, Calon B, Pottecher T. Assessment of quality in day-case hand surgery. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2009; 28 (09) 735-742
  • 8 Hassanzadeh-Kiabi F, Negahdari B. Antinociceptive synergistic interaction between Achillea millefolium and Origanum vulgare L. extract encapsulated in liposome in rat. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2018; 46 (05) 994-1000
  • 9 Vahabi S, Karimi A, Ghanavati M. Comparison of complications between gender during spinal anesthesia. J Surg Oper Care 2018; 3 (02) 201
  • 10 Robaux S, Coulibaly Y, Konaté B. et al. Impact of 2 strategies of analgesia on postoperative pain after emergency hand surgery performed on an ambulatory basis. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2003; 22 (08) 691-696
  • 11 Vadivelu N, Mitra S, Narayan D. Recent advances in postoperative pain management. Yale J Biol Med 2010; 83 (01) 11-25
  • 12 Hasanzadeh-Kiabi F, Negahdari B. Applications of drug anesthesia in control chronic pain. J Invest Surg 2019; 32 (03) 232-237
  • 13 Beiranvand S, Vahabi S. Effect of local ropivacaine on hemodynamic responses in craniotomy patients. J Invest Surg 2018; 31 (06) 464-468
  • 14 Miller RD, Pardo M. Basics of Anesthesia e-book. Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011
  • 15 Trevor AJ, Katzung BG, Masters SB, Kruidering-Hall M. Pharmacology examination & board review. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2010
  • 16 Hasanzadeh-Kiabi F. Nano-drug for pain medicine. Drug Res (Stuttg) 2018; 68 (05) 245-249
  • 17 Champely S, Ekstrom C, Dalgaard P, Gill J, Weibelzahl S, Anandkumar A, Ford C, Volcic R, Volcic R, and De Rosario H.. “pwr: Basic functions for power analysis”. R package version 2017; 1 (01) 665
  • 18 Cohen J. Statistical Power. Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988: 273-406
  • 19 Bhosale UA, Khobragade R, Naik C, Yegnanarayan R, Kale J. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the pharmacodynamic interaction of 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron and paracetamol in postoperative patients operated in an ENT department under local anesthesia. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2015; 26 (03) 217-222
  • 20 Alipour M, Tabari M, Alipour M. Paracetamol, ondansetron, granisetron, magnesium sulfate and lidocaine and reduced propofol injection pain. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 16 (03) e16086
  • 21 Saliminia A, Azimaraghi O, Javadi A, Abdoulahpoor M, Movafegh A. Comparison of granisetron and lidocaine on reducing injection pain of etomidate: a controlled randomized study. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2017; 67 (06) 615-618
  • 22 Minville V, Fourcade O, Mazoit JX, Girolami JP, Tack I. Ondansetron does not block paracetamol-induced analgesia in a mouse model of fracture pain. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106 (01) 112-118
  • 23 Alizadeh R, Mireskandari S-M, Azarshahin M. et al. Oral clonidine premedication reduces nausea and vomiting in children after appendectomy. Iran J Pediatr 2012; 22 (03) 399-403
  • 24 Jokela R, Ahonen J, Seitsonen E, Marjakangas P, Korttila K. The influence of ondansetron on the analgesic effect of acetaminophen after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010; 87 (06) 672-678
  • 25 Memis D, Inal MT, Kavalci G, Sezer A, Sut N. Intravenous paracetamol reduced the use of opioids, extubation time, and opioid-related adverse effects after major surgery in intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2010; 25 (03) 458-462