PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(02): 360-366
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735799
Original Article

Influence of Tip Diameter and Light Spectrum of Curing Units on the Properties of Bulk-Fill Resin Composites

Igor Oliveiros Cardoso
1   Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
,
Alexandre Coelho Machado
2   Technical School of Health, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
,
Luísa de Oliveira Fernandes
1   Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
,
Paulo Vinícius Soares
3   Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
,
Luís Henrique Araújo Raposo 
1   Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil
› Institutsangaben Funding This study was partially supported by the Minas Gerais State Agency for Research and Development (FAPEMIG: grant CDS APQ 03963/16).
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different light-curing units (LCUs) with distinct tip diameters and light spectra for activating bulk-fill resins.

Materials and Methods The specimens (n = 10) were made from a conventional composite (Amaris, VOCO) and bulk-fill resins (Aura Bulk Fill, SDI; Filtek One, 3M ESPE; Tetric Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent) with two diameters, 7 or 10 mm, × 2 mm thickness. Following 24 hours of specimen preparation, the degree of conversion (DC) was evaluated using the Fourier-transform infrared unit. Knoop hardness (KHN) readings were performed on the center and periphery of the specimens. Data were assessed for homoscedasticity and submitted to one-way and three-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey's and Dunnett's tests, depending on the analysis performed (α = 0.05).

Results LCUs and specimen diameter significantly affected the DC. The Tetric Bulk Fill provided increased DC results when light-cured with Valo (54.8 and 53.5%, for 7 and 10 mm, respectively) compared with Radii Xpert (52.1 and 52.9%, for 7 and 10 mm, respectively). No significant differences in KHN results were noted for the conventional resin composite (Amaris) compared with LCUs (p = 0.213) or disc diameters (p = 0.587), but the center of the specimen exhibited superior KHN (p ≤ 0.001) than the periphery.

Conclusion The light spectrum of the multipeak LCU (Valo) significantly increased the DC and KHN of the bulk-fill resin composite with additional initiator to camphorquinone (Tetric Bulk Fill) compared with the monowave LCU (Radii Xpert). The tip size of the LCUs influenced the performance of some of the resin composites tested.

Keywords

resin composite - light curing - polymerization


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. Dezember 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E. et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014; 93 (10) 943-949
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Mantri SP, Mantri SS. Management of shrinkage stresses in direct restorative light-cured composites: a review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013; 25 (05) 305-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S. et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11 (01) 5-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP, de Melo Monteiro GQ. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23 (01) 221-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cerda-Rizo ER, de Paula Rodrigues M, Vilela A. et al. Bonding interaction and shrinkage stress of low-viscosity bulk fill resin composites with high-viscosity bulk fill or conventional resin composites. Oper Dent 2019; 44 (06) 625-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pereira AG, Raposo L, Teixeira D. et al. Influence of battery level of a cordless LED unit on the properties of a nanofilled composite resin. Oper Dent 2016; 41 (04) 409-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shimokawa CAK, Turbino ML, Giannini M, Braga RR, Price RB. Effect of light curing units on the polymerization of bulk fill resin-based composites. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (08) 1211-1221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Price RB, Labrie D, Rueggeberg FA, Sullivan B, Kostylev I, Fahey J. Correlation between the beam profile from a curing light and the microhardness of four resins. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (12) 1345-1357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sahadi BO, Price RB, André CB. et al. Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32: e122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Soares CJ, Rodrigues MP, Oliveira LRS. et al. An Evaluation of the Light Output from 22 Contemporary Light Curing Units. Braz Dent J 2017; 28 (03) 362-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lombardo L, Marcon M, Arveda N, La Falce G, Tonello E, Siciliani G. Preliminary biometric analysis of mesiodistal tooth dimensions in subjects with normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150 (01) 105-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Merz ML, Isaacson RJ, Germane N, Rubenstein LK. Tooth diameters and arch perimeters in a black and a white population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100 (01) 53-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Shimokawa CA, Turbino ML, Harlow JE, Price HL, Price RB. Light output from six battery operated dental curing lights. Mater Sci Eng C 2016; 69: 1036-1042
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cardoso IO, Machado AC, Teixeira D, Basílio FC, Marletta A, Soares PV. Influence of different cordless light-emitting-diode units and battery levels on chemical, mechanical, and physical properties of composite resin. Oper Dent 2020; 45 (04) 377-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pirmoradian M, Hooshmand T, Jafari-Semnani S, Fadavi F. Degree of conversion and microhardness of bulk-fill dental composites polymerized by LED and QTH light curing units. J Oral Biosci 2020; 62 (01) 107-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Al-Zain AO, Eckert GJ, Platt JA. The influence of distance on radiant exposure and degree of conversion using different light-emitting-diode curing units. Oper Dent 2019; 44 (03) E133-E144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Menees TS, Lin CP, Kojic DD, Burgess JO, Lawson NC. Depth of cure of bulk fill composites with monowave and polywave curing lights. Am J Dent 2015; 28 (06) 357-361
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Shortall AC, Palin WM, Burtscher P. Refractive index mismatch and monomer reactivity influence composite curing depth. J Dent Res 2008; 87 (01) 84-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sampaio CS, Pizarro PG, Atria PJ, Hirata R, Giannini M, Mahn E. Effect of shortened light-curing modes on bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent 2020; 45 (05) 496-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 de Oliveira D, Rocha MG, Correr AB, Ferracane JL, Sinhoreti M. Effect of beam profiles from different light emission tip types of multiwave light-emitting diodes on the curing profile of resin-based composites. Oper Dent 2019; 44 (04) 365-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 2010; 89 (10) 1063-1067
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Durão MA, Andrade AKM, Santos MDCMDS, Montes MAJR, Monteiro GQM. Clinical performance of bulk-fill resin composite restorations using the United States Public Health Service and Federation Dentaire Internationale Criteria: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Eur J Dent 2021; 15 (02) 179-192
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shimokawa C, Turbino ML, Giannini M, Braga RR, Price RB. Effect of curing light and exposure time on the polymerization of bulk-fill resin-based composites in molar teeth. Oper Dent 2020; 45 (03) E141-E155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Amirouche-Korichi A, Mouzali M, Watts DC. Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage-strain of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2009; 25 (11) 1411-1418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bin Nooh AN, Nahedh HA, AlRefeai M, Alkhudhairy F. The effect of irradiance on the degree of conversion and volumetric polymerization shrinkage of different bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2021; 15 (02) 312-319
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bicalho AA, Pereira RD, Zanatta RF. et al. Incremental filling technique and composite material–part I: cuspal deformation, bond strength, and physical properties. Oper Dent 2014; 39 (02) E71-E82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ilie N, Hilton TJ, Heintze SD. et al. Academy of Dental Materials guidance-resin composites: part I-mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2017; 33 (08) 880-894
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Magalhães Filho TR, Weig KM, Costa MF, Werneck MM, Barthem RB, Costa Neto CA. Effect of LED-LCU light irradiance distribution on mechanical properties of resin based materials. Mater Sci Eng C 2016; 63: 301-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Price RB, Rueggeberg FA, Harlow J, Sullivan B. Effect of mold type, diameter, and uncured composite removal method on depth of cure. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20 (07) 1699-1707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Corciolani G, Vichi A, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. The influence of tip geometry and distance on light-curing efficacy. Oper Dent 2008; 33 (03) 325-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lima RBW, Troconis CCM, Moreno MBP, Murillo-Gómez F, De Goes MF. Depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30 (06) 492-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar