Wind Noise Management in Hearing Aids

Abstract

Many hearing aid users are negatively impacted by wind noise when spending time outdoors. Turbulent airflow around hearing aid microphones caused by the obstruction of wind can result in noise that is not only perceived as annoying but may also mask desirable sounds in the listening environment, such as speech. To mitigate the adverse effects of wind noise, hearing aid developers have introduced several technological solutions to reduce the amount of wind noise at the hearing aid output. Some solutions are based on mechanical modifications; more recently, sophisticated signal processing algorithms have also been introduced. By offering solutions to the wind noise problem, these signal processing algorithms can promote more optimal use of hearing aids during outdoor activities. This article reviews how wind noise is generated in hearing aids, outlines the technological challenges in wind noise management, and summarizes the technological solutions that have been proposed and/or implemented in modern hearing aids.

Keywords

hearing aids - noise reduction - wind noise

• References

• 1 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing. Hear J 2010; 63 (01) 19-27
• 2 Bisgaard N, Ruf S. Findings from EuroTrak surveys from 2009 to 2015: hearing loss prevalence, hearing aid adoption, and benefits of hearing aid use. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (3S): 451-461
• 3 Zakis JA. Wind noise at microphones within and across hearing aids at wind speeds below and above microphone saturation. J Acoust Soc Am 2011; 129 (06) 3897-3907
• 4 Strasberg M. Dimensional analysis of windscreen in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 544-548
• 5 Kates J. Digital Hearing Aids. Plural Publishing; 2008
• 6 Morgan S, Raspet R. Investigation of the mechanisms of low-frequency wind noise generation outdoors. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92 (02) 1180-1183
• 7 Dillon H, Roe I, Katsch R. Wind Noise in Hearing Aids: Mechanisms and Measurements. National Acoustics Laboratories; 1999
• 8 Chung K. Strategies to reduce wind noise interference on hearing aids. Hear J 2020; 73 (07) 10-13
• 9 Wuttke J. Microphones and the wind. J Audio Eng Soc 1991; 40: 809-817
• 10 Raspet R, Webster J, Dillion K. Framework for wind noise studies. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119 (02) 834-843
• 11 Brown D, Mongeau L. The Design, Construction, and Validation of a Small, Low- Speed, Quiet Wind Tunnel with Application to Noise from the Flow over a Cavity. Purdue University; 1995: HL95-HL99
• 12 Beard J, Nepomuceno H. Wind Noise Levels for an ITE Hearing Aid. Knowles Electronics; 2001
• 13 Chung K, Mongeau L, McKibben N. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: polar characteristics of behind-the-ear hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 2009; 125 (04) 2243-2259
• 14 Corcos G. Resolution of pressure in turbulence. J Acoust Soc Am 1963; 35: 192-199
• 15 Corcos G. The structure of the turbulence field in boundary-layer flows. J Fluid Mech 1964; 18: 353-378
• 16 Widex SUPER™ Power to Hear. Widex; 2012 . Accessed March 5, 2021 at: https://fi.widex.pro/-/media/downloads/pdf/hearing-aids/super/brochures/en/widex-super-vsd-introduction-brochure_9-502-2928-001-01.pdf
• 17 Ricketts TA, Dittberner AB, Johnson EE. High-frequency amplification and sound quality in listeners with normal through moderate hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (01) 160-172
• 18 Chung K, McKibben N, Mongeau L. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 2010; 127 (04) 2529-2542
• 19 Groth J. An Innovative RIE with Microphone in the Ear Lets Users “Hear with Their Own Ears.”. GN Hearing A/S; 2020: 1-8
• 20 Chung K. Effects of venting on wind noise levels measured at the eardrum. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (04) 470-481
• 21 Ricketts TA. Directional hearing AIDS. Trends Amplif 2001; 5 (04) 139-176
• 22 Bentler R, Chiou L-K. Digital noise reduction: an overview. Trends Amplif 2006; 10 (02) 67-82
• 23 Stender T, Hielscher M. Windguard: Bringing Listening Comfort to Windy Conditions. ReSound; 2011
• 24 Weille J, Andersen R. Wind Noise Management. Oticon; 2016
• 25 Latzel M, Appleton J. Evaluation of a binaural speech in wind feature, Part 1: verification in the laboratory. Hear Rev 2013; 8: 32-34
• 26 Latzel M, Appleton J. Evaluation of a binaural speech in wind feature, Part 2: validation and real-life benefit. Hear Rev 2013; 9: 32-35
• 27 Kuk F, Ludvigsen C, Paludan-Muller C. Improving hearing aid performance in noise: challenges and strategies. Hear J 2002; 55 (04) 34-46
• 28 Dillon H. Hearing Aids. 2nd ed.. Boomerang Press; 2012
• 29 Chung K. Wind noise in hearing aids: I. Effect of wide dynamic range compression and modulation-based noise reduction. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (01) 16-28
• 30 Kuk F, Keenan D, Lau C-C, Ludvigsen C. Performance of a fully adaptive directional microphone to signals presented from various azimuths. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (06) 333-347
• 31 Graves A, Mohamed H, Hinton G. Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. Paper presented at IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing; May 26 – 31, 2013; Vancouver, Canada.
• 32 Lipton Z, Berkowitz J, Elkan C. A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning. arXiv 2015;1506.00019v4
• 33 Chen J, Wang Y, Yoho SE, Wang D, Healy EW. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises. J Acoust Soc Am 2016; 139 (05) 2604-2612
• 34 Keshavarzi M, Goehring T, Zakis J, Turner RE, Moore BCJ. Use of a deep recurrent neural network to reduce wind noise: effects on judged speech intelligibility and sound quality. Trends Hear 2018; 22: 2331216518770964
• 35 Haykin S. Adaptive Filter Theory. Pearson; 2014
• 36 Korhonen P, Kuk F, Seper E, Mørkebjerg M, Roikjer M. Evaluation of a wind noise attenuation algorithm on subjective annoyance and speech-in-wind performance. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28 (01) 046-057
• 37 Lee L. Efficiency of a wind noise attenuation algorithm. Hear Rev 2016; 23 (06) 22-25
• 38 Kuk F, Lau C-C, Korhonen P, Crose B, Peeters H, Keenan D. Development of the ORCA nonsense syllable test. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (06) 779-795
• 39 Picou EM. MarkeTrak 10 (MT10) survey results demonstrate high satisfaction with and benefits from hearing aids. Semin Hear 2020; 41 (01) 21-36