J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 83(S 02): e438-e442
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730890
Original Article

A Laboratory Investigation on a Tailored Skin and Muscle Flap Variant for the Retrosigmoid Approach

Salvatore Chibbaro
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Helene Cebula
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Arthur Gubian
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Julien Todeschi
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Antonino Scibilia
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Beniamino Nannavecchia
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Louise Scheer
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Maria Teresa Bozzi
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Pierre Mahoudeau
2   Division of ENT, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Andres Coca
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Francesco Signorelli
3   Division of Neurosurgery, Bari University Hospital, Bari France
,
Idir Djennaoui
2   Division of ENT, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Christian Debry
2   Division of ENT, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
,
Mario Ganau
1   Division of Neurosurgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Introduction An anatomical study was conducted to test a modified C-shaped flap designed for patients undergoing a keyhole approach and/or minicraniotomy for retrosigmoid approach (KRSA).

Materials and Methods Ten heads specimens were used. The surgical technique investigated was based on a 4-cm C-shaped skin incision with medial convexity (placed 8 cm laterally to the external occipital protuberance, with the lower edge terminating 1.5 to 2 cm above the mastoid tip), which followed by careful subperiosteal dissection and completed by reflecting and securing the skin flap layer anteriorly and the muscle flaps superiorly and inferiorly by stitches. Anatomical findings, including depth of surgical corridor till to the cerebellopontine cistern (CPC) as well as the sparing of neurovascular structures, were evaluated in every specimen.

Results Twenty surgical approaches to CPC were conducted, resulting in a short working distance to the target (32 mm) without any need for a self-retaining retractor. In every specimen, the integrity of occipital muscles and cutaneous nerves was maintained, and a solid multilayer closure was always achieved. These data suggest that landmarks-based design of this C-shaped incision could be helpful in avoiding damages to the soft tissues encountered during KRSA.

Conclusion This modified approach provides a wide surgical corridor to access the CPC while ensuring the minimal invasiveness of the standard S-shaped incision. Compared with the latter, it preserves better the integrity of the surrounding soft tissues and appears less likely to cause any iatrogenic injury to occipital muscles and cutaneous nerves.

Authors' Contributions

All the authors have contributed to the writing of this manuscript, and have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 12 February 2020

Accepted: 23 April 2021

Article published online:
31 May 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Bellew MP, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surface landmarks for the junction between the transverse and sigmoid sinuses: application of the “strategic” burr hole for suboccipital craniotomy. Neurosurgery 2009; 65 (6, Suppl): discussion 41 37-41
  • 2 Yamashima T, Lee JH, Tobias S, Kim C-H, Chang JH, Kwon J-T. Surgical procedure “simplified retrosigmoid approach” for C-P angle lesions. J Clin Neurosci 2004; 11 (02) 168-171
  • 3 Kemp WJ, Cohen-Gadol AA. A review of skin incisions and scalp flaps for the retromastoid approach and description of an alternative technique. Surg Neurol Int 2011; 2: 143
  • 4 Jackson CG, McGrew BM, Forest JA. et al. Comparison of postoperative headache after retrosigmoid approach: vestibular nerve section versus vestibular schwannoma resection. Am J Otol 2000; 21 (03) 412-416
  • 5 Mosek AC, Dodick DW, Ebersold MJ, Swanson JW. Headache after resection of acoustic neuroma. Headache 1999; 39 (02) 89-94
  • 6 Lee M, Brown M, Chepla K. et al. An anatomical study of the lesser occipital nerve and its potential compression points: implications for surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (06) 1551-1556
  • 7 Schessel DA, Rowed DW, Nedzelski JM, Feghali JG. Postoperative pain following excision of acoustic neuroma by the suboccipital approach: observations on possible cause and potential amelioration. Am J Otol 1993; 14 (05) 491-494
  • 8 Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Wellons JC, Blount JP, Oakes WJ. Landmarks for the identification of the cutaneous nerves of the occiput and nuchal regions. Clin Anat 2007; 20 (03) 235-238
  • 9 Schaller B, Baumann A. Headache after removal of vestibular schwannoma via the retrosigmoid approach: a long-term follow-up-study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128 (03) 387-395
  • 10 Jannetta PJ, McLaughlin MR, Casey KF. Technique of microvascular decompression. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 18 (05) E5
  • 11 McLaughlin MR, Jannetta PJ, Clyde BL, Subach BR, Comey CH, Resnick DK. Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves: lessons learned after 4400 operations. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (01) 1-8
  • 12 Bond AE, Zada G, Gonzalez AA, Hansen C, Giannotta SL. Operative strategies for minimizing hearing loss and other major complications associated with microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. World Neurosurg 2010; 74 (01) 172-177
  • 13 Catalano PJ, Jacobowitz O, Post KD. Prevention of headache after retrosigmoid removal of acoustic tumors. Am J Otol 1996; 17 (06) 904-908
  • 14 Kemp III WJ, Tubbs RS, Cohen-Gadol AA. The innervation of the scalp: a comprehensive review including anatomy, pathology, and neurosurgical correlates. Surg Neurol Int 2011; 2: 178
  • 15 Della Pepa GM, Montano N, Lucantoni C, Alexandre AM, Papacci F, Meglio M. Craniotomy repair with the retrosigmoid approach: the impact on quality of life of meticulous reconstruction of anatomical layers. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (11) 2255-2258
  • 16 Cohen-Gadol AA. Microvascular decompression surgery for trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm: naunces of the technique based on experiences with 100 patients and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011; 113 (10) 844-853
  • 17 Fukuhara T, Silverman DA, Hughes GB. et al. Vestibular nerve sectioning for intractable vertigo: efficacy of simplified retrosigmoid approach. Otol Neurotol 2002; 23 (01) 67-72
  • 18 Garzon-Muvdi T, Jackson C, See AP, Woodworth GF, Tamargo RJ. Preservation of the greater occipital nerve during suboccipital craniectomy results in a paradoxical increase in postoperative headaches. Neurosurgery 2015; 76 (04) 435-440 , discussion 440
  • 19 Huang X, Xu M, Xu J. et al. Complications and management of large intracranial vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach. World Neurosurg 2017; 99: 326-335
  • 20 Silverman DA, Hughes GB, Kinney SE, Lee JH. Technical modifications of suboccipital craniectomy for prevention of postoperative headache. Skull Base 2004; 14 (02) 77-84
  • 21 Tomasello F, Esposito F, Abbritti RV. et al. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: technical refinement for complication avoidance. World Neurosurg 2016; 94: 26-31
  • 22 Chibbaro S, Cebula H, Scibilia A. et al. Retrosigmoid approach: investigating the role of a c-shaped skin incision and muscle flaps in improving functional outcome and reducing postoperative pain. World Neurosurg 2018; 111: e340-e347