PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2021; 15(04): 660-668
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727553
Original Article

Comparative Analysis of Different Local Anesthetic Solutions Available in Market: An In Vitro and Clinical Study

Eisha Imran 
1   Department of Dental Materials, Islamic International Dental College, Riphah University, Islamabad, Pakistan
,
Faisal Moeen
1   Department of Dental Materials, Islamic International Dental College, Riphah University, Islamabad, Pakistan
,
Beenish Abbas
2   Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Foundation University, Islamabad, Pakistan
,
Bakhtawar Yaqoob
1   Department of Dental Materials, Islamic International Dental College, Riphah University, Islamabad, Pakistan
,
Mehreen Wajahat
3   Department of Science of Dental Materials, Avicenna Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Quratulain Khan
4   Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Shifa College of Dentistry, Shifa Tameer e Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
,
Zohaib Khurshid 
5   Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate and compare various commercially available local anesthetic solutions.

Materials and Methods A total of 150 commercially available local anesthetic cartridges of similar composition (2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000) were randomly collected and divided into 3 groups. The designations of groups were selected from their product names such that each group consisted of 60 cartridges. Group S (Septodont, France) Group M (Medicaine, Korea) and Group H (HD-Caine, Pakistan). The samples were divided into five sub-groups, each consisting of 10 cartridges from each group to investigate each parameter.

Results The acquired data was statistically analyzed and compared (using SPSS version 12). Compositional analysis revealed a non-significant (P>0.05) difference when the three Groups were compared with standard lidocaine and epinephrine solutions. The mean pH values of samples from group S, M, and H respectively fell within the range of pH values of commercially available solutions. Non-significant difference in EPT values of Group S and H was found when efficacy was compared (p = 0.3), however a significant difference (p < 0.01) was observed in contrast to Group M. Anti-bacterial activity was observed in all the group and a non-significant difference in cell viability values of Group S and M was found (p = 0.6), while the difference was significant in comparison to Group H.

Conclusion Within the limitations of these investigations, it appears that the properties of different manufacturers fall within the recommended ranges as mentioned in literature and do not appear to be statistically different in the variables we have tested.

Keywords

dental local anesthesia - lidocaine - epinephrine - composition - pH - efficacy - antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. Mai 2021

© 2021. European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Malamed SF. Local anesthetics: dentistry’s most important drugs, clinical update 2006. J Calif Dent Assoc 2006; 34 (12) 971-976
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ribeiro Jr PD, Sanches MG, Okamoto T. Comparative analysis of tissue reactions to anesthetic solutions: histological analysis in subcutaneous tissue of rats. Anesth Prog 2003; 50 (04) 169-180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Yalcin BK. Complications associated with local anesthesia in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Topics Local Anesthetics Intech Open 2019
  • 4 Frank SG, Lalonde DH. How acidic is the lidocaine we are injecting, and how much bicarbonate should we add. ? Can J Plast Surg 2012; 20 (02) 71-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Brandt RG, Efficacy of local anesthetics in clinical dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PhD dissertation: University of Michigan: US. 2010;52(6):779-789
  • 6 Aulestia-Viera PV, Braga MM, Borsatti MA. The effect of adjusting the pH of local anaesthetics in dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2018; 51 (08) 862-876
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog 2012; 59 (02) 90-101 quiz 102–103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brandis K.. Alkalinisation of local anaesthetic solutions. Aust Prescr 2011; 34: 173-175 doi: DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2011.091.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mumba JM, Kabambi FK, Ngaka CT. Pharmacology of local anaesthetics and commonly used recipes in clinical practice. Curr Topics Anesthesiol Intech Open 2017; doi: DOI: 10.5772/67048.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Aydin ON, Eyigor M, Aydin N. Antimicrobial activity of ropivacaine and other local anaesthetics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18 (10) 687-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fedder C, Beck-Schimmer B, Aguirre J. et al In vitro exposure of human fibroblasts to local anaesthetics impairs cell growth. Clin Exp Immunol 2010; 162 (02) 280-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Park J, Sutradhar BC, Hong G, Choi SH, Kim G. Comparison of the cytotoxic effects of bupivacaine, lidocaine, and mepivacaine in equine articular chondrocytes. Vet Anaesth Analg 2011; 38 (02) 127-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Goldstein IM, Lind S, Hoffstein S, Weissmann G. Influence of local anesthetics upon human polymorphonuclear leukocyte function in vitro. Reduction of lysosomal enzyme release and superoxide anion production. J Exp Med 1977; 146 (02) 483-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chang Y-S, Tseng S-Y, Tseng S-H, Wu C-L. Cytotoxicity of lidocaine or bupivacaine on corneal endothelial cells in a rabbit model. Cornea 2006; 25 (05) 590-596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Liu W, Yang X, Li C, Mo A. Adverse drug reactions to local anesthetics: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 115 (03) 319-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Yagiela JA. Adverse drug interactions in dental practice: interactions associated with vasoconstrictors. Part V of a series. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130 (05) 701-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zanon D, Volpato C, Addobbati R. et al. Stability of a novel lidocaine, adrenaline and tetracaine sterile thermosensitive gel: a ready-to-use formulation. Eur J Pharm Sci 2019; 136: 104962 doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.104962.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Mishra AK, Mishra A, Chattopadhyay P. A reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of epinephrine in pharmaceutical formulation. Arch Appl Sci Res 2010; 2: 251-256
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Kupiec T. Quality-control analytical methods: high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Pharm Compd 2004; 8 (03) 223-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dianat O, Mozayeni MA, Layeghnejad MK, Shojaeian S. The efficacy of supplemental intraseptal and buccal infiltration anesthesia in mandibular molars of patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24 (03) 1281-1286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shantiaee Y, Javaheri S, Movahhedian A, Eslami S, Dianat O. Efficacy of preoperative ibuprofen and meloxicam on the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block for teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Int Dent J 2017; 67 (02) 85-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Heft MW, Parker SR. An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain. Pain 1984; 19 (02) 153-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part I: general information and thermal tests. Int Endod J 2010; 43 (09) 738-762
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jespersen JJ, Hellstein J, Williamson A, Johnson WT, Qian F. Evaluation of dental pulp sensibility tests in a clinical setting. J Endod 2014; 40 (03) 351-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Doyle DJ, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA class). StatPearls 2019
  • 26 Abdulwahab M, Boynes S, Moore P. et al The efficacy of six local anesthetic formulations used for posterior mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140 (08) 1018-1024
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Imran E, Moeen F, Satti H, Rahman L.. Investigating the cytotoxic and anti-bacterial activity of commercially available local anesthetics: An in-vitro analysis. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020; 29 (04) 185-192 Doi: DOI: 10.25301/JPDA.294.185.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Al-Salman H, Shaker A, Maan A, Hussein HH. Estimation of lidocaine-HCl in pharmaceutical drugs by HPLC-UV System. Am J PharmTech Res 2017; 7: 249-3387
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Fijałek Z, Baczyński E, Piwońska A, Warowna-Grześkiewicz M. Determination of local anaesthetics and their impurities in pharmaceutical preparations using HPLC method with amperometric detection. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2005; 37 (05) 913-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Goodchild JH, Donaldson M. Comparing the pH change of local anesthetic solutions using two chairside buffering techniques. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2016; 37 (05) e6-e12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ueno T, Tsuchiya H, Mizogami M, Takakura K. Local anesthetic failure associated with inflammation: verification of the acidosis mechanism and the hypothetic participation of inflammatory peroxynitrite. J Inflamm Res 2008; 1: 41-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Gazal G, Fareed WM, Zafar MS. Effectiveness of gaseous and intravenous inductions on children’s anxiety and distress during extraction of teeth under general anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth 2015; 9 (01) 33-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Gazal G, Fareed WM, Zafar MS, Al-Samadani KH. Pain and anxiety management for pediatric dental procedures using various combinations of sedative drugs: a review. Saudi Pharm J 2016; 24 (04) 379-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gazal G, Tola AW, Fareed WM, Alnazzawi AA, Zafar MS. A randomized control trial comparing the visual and verbal communication methods for reducing fear and anxiety during tooth extraction. Saudi Dent J 2016; 28 (02) 80-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kashyap VM, Desai R, Reddy PB, Menon S. Effect of alkalinisation of lignocaine for intraoral nerve block on pain during injection, and speed of onset of anaesthesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49 (08) e72-e75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Meechan JG, Kanaa MD, Corbett IP, Steen IN, Whitworth JM. Pulpal anaesthesia for mandibular permanent first molar teeth: a double-blind randomized cross-over trial comparing buccal and buccal plus lingual infiltration injections in volunteers. Int Endod J 2006; 39 (10) 764-769
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Gazal G, Fareed WM, Zafar MS. Role of intraseptal anesthesia for pain-free dental treatment. Saudi J Anaesth 2016; 10 (01) 81-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Brandt RG, Anderson PF, McDonald NJ, Sohn W, Peters MC. The pulpal anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in dentistry: a meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142 (05) 493-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Roberts GJ, Simmons NB, Longhurst P, Hewitt PB. Bacteraemia following local anaesthetic injections in children. Br Dent J 1998; 185 (06) 295-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Kim HT, Lim S-W, Yim KH. et al Antibacterial effect of lidocaine in various clinical conditions. Anesth Pain Med 2019; 14 (02) 165-171
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kesici S, Demirci M, Kesici U. Antibacterial effects of lidocaine and adrenaline. Int Wound J 2019; 16 (05) 1190-1194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Aydin ON, Eyigor M, Aydin N. Antimicrobial activity of ropivacaine and other local anaesthetics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18 (10) 687-694
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Aslantürk ÖS. In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Cell Viability Assays: Principles, Advantages, and Disadvantages, Genotoxicity - A Predictable Risk to Our Actual World, Marcelo L. Larramendy and Sonia Soloneski; IntechOpen. 2017. Doi: 10.5772/intechopen.71923. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/books/genotoxicity-a-predictable-risk-to-our-actual-world/in-vitro-cytotoxicity-and-cell-viability-assays-principles-advantages-and-disadvantages
  • 44 Wu T, Shi Z, Song H, Li Y, Li JH. Cytotoxicity of local anesthetics on rabbit adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells during early chondrogenic differentiation. Exp Ther Med 2018; 16 (04) 2843-2850
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Shoshani O, Berger J, Fodor L. et al The effect of lidocaine and adrenaline on the viability of injected adipose tissue–an experimental study in nude mice. J Drugs Dermatol 2005; 4 (03) 311-316
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Garisto GA, Gaffen AS, Lawrence HP, Tenenbaum HC, Haas DA. Occurrence of paresthesia after dental local anesthetic administration in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141 (07) 836-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ahmad M. The anatomical nature of dental paresthesia: a quick review. Open Dent J 2018; 12: 155-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Sánchez GA, Takara D, Alonso GL. Local anesthetics inhibit Ca-ATPase in masticatory muscles. J Dent Res 2010; 89 (04) 372-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Sharma U. Palatal ulceration: a local anesthetic complication. Indian J Health Sci Biomed Res 2017; 10 (01) 94
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar