Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12(02): 301-309
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727154
Research Article

eHealth Literacy of Medical and Health Science Students and Factors Affecting eHealth Literacy in an Ethiopian University: A Cross-Sectional Study

Nebyu Demeke Mengestie
1   Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
,
Tesfahun Melese Yilma
1   Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
,
Miftah Abdella Beshir
1   Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
,
Genet Kiflemariam Paulos
2   Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background eHealth literacy is individual's ability to look for, understand, and evaluate health information from electronic sources. Integrating eHealth literacy to the health system could help lower health care costs and ensure health equity. Despite its importance, the eHealth literacy level in Ethiopia has not been studied on medical and health science students, who are important parties in the health system. Understanding their level of eHealth literacy augments practice of health care, efficiency in education, and use of eHealth technologies.

Objective This research study aims to determine eHealth literacy level and identify its associated factors among medical and health science students in University of Gondar (UoG).

Methods An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March to May 2019 among undergraduate medical and health science students in the UoG. Stratified multistage sampling was used. The eHealth literacy scale was used to measure eHealth literacy. A binary logistic regression model was fitted to measure association between eHealth literacy and the independent variables.

Results A total of 801 students participated in this study with a 94.6% of response rate. The majority (60%) were male and previously lived-in urban areas (68%). The mean eHealth literacy score was 28.7 and 60% of the participants possessed high eHealth literacy. Using health-specific Web sites (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.86–4.33), having higher Internet efficacy (AOR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.56–3.26), perceived usefulness of the Internet (AOR = 3.33, 95% CI: 1.95–5.69), medical app use (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.13–2.55), being female (AOR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.08–2.22), and being health informatics student (AOR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.149–3.148) affect a high eHealth literacy level.

Conclusion The level of eHealth literacy in this study was moderate. Using specific reputable health Web sites, using smartphone medical applications, and Internet efficacy determine eHealth literacy significantly.

Keywords

eHealth literacy - health inequality - Internet - health information

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

Ethical clearance was obtained from research and ethical review board of University of Gondar. The study participants were informed about the objective and expected outcomes of the study and written consent was available guaranteeing choices of participation or refusal. Thus, participants read the consent form and provided a written approval or refusal for participation. All the information recorded was anonymous and kept confidential throughout the study.




Publication History

Received: 04 November 2020

Accepted: 17 February 2021

Article published online:
07 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Bell G. Bell's Law for the Birth and Death of Computer Classes: A Theory of the Computer's Evolution. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Newsl 2009; 13 (04) 8-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rothman BS, Gupta RK, McEvoy MD. Mobile technology in the perioperative arena: rapid evolution and future disruption. Anesth Analg 2017; 124 (03) 807-818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Davies BS, Rafique J, Vincent TR. et al. Mobile Medical Education (MoMEd) - how mobile information resources contribute to learning for undergraduate clinical students - a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ 2012; 12: 1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Boruff JT, Storie D. Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information. J Med Libr Assoc 2014; 102 (01) 22-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Franko OI, Tirrell TF. Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst 2012; 36 (05) 3135-3139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chambers R, Schmid M. Making technology-enabled health care work in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68 (668) 108-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Arora VS, McKee M, Stuckler D. Google trends: opportunities and limitations in health and health policy research. Health Policy 2019; 123 (03) 338-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jacobs W, Amuta AO, Jeon KC. Health information seeking in the digital age: An analysis of health information seeking behavior among US adults. Cogent Soc Sci 2017; 123: 3-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gualtieri LN. The doctor as the second opinion and the internet as the first. Paper presented at: The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings; 2009 Boston, NY:
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Stevenson FA, Kerr C, Murray E, Nazareth I. Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective–a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2007; 8: 47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Boon-itt S. Quality of health websites and their influence on perceived usefulness, trust and intention to use: an analysis from Thailand. J Innov Entrep 2019; 8: 4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth literacy: Essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res 2006; 8 (02) e9
    Google Scholar
  • 13 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Health literacy online: a guide to simplifying the user experience (2015). Accessed March 4, 2020 at: https://health.gov/healthliteracyonline/
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Health Literacy. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA. eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Neter E, Brainin E. eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14 (01) e19
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Brown CA, Dickson R. Healthcare students' e-literacy skills. J Allied Health 2010; 39 (03) 179-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tissera S, Silva N. Self-reported eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students in selected districts of Sri Lanka. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 245: 1339
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Park H, Lee E. Self-reported eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students in South Korea: a pilot study. Nurse Educ Today 2015; 35 (02) 408-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Islam MM, Touray M, Yang HC. et al. E-Health literacy and health information seeking behavior among university students in Bangladesh. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 245: 122-125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dashti S, Peyman N, Tajfard M, Esmaeeli H. E-Health literacy of medical and health sciences university students in Mashhad, Iran in 2016: a pilot study. Electron Physician 2017; 9 (03) 3966-3973
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 World Bank. Individuals using the Internet (% of population). Published 2017. Accessed February 20, 2020 at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Jiang S, Street RL. Pathway linking Internet health information seeking to better health: a moderated mediation study. Health Communication 2017; 32 (08) 1024-1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Keselman A, Arnott Smith C, Murcko AC, Kaufman DR. Evaluating the quality of health information in a changing digital ecosystem. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (02) e11129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Marschang S. Health inequalities and eHealth: report of the e-health stakeholder group. 2014 . Accessed March 9, 2021 at: http://www.ehealth2014.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Pres_Marschang.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Kickbusch I, Pelikan J, Apfel F, Tsouros A. eds. Health literacy: The Solid Facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Almeida-Filho N. A glossary for health inequalities. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56 (09) 647-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Grady A, Yoong S, Sutherland R, Lee H, Nathan N, Wolfenden L. Improving the public health impact of eHealth and mHealth interventions. Aust N Z J Public Health 2018; 42 (02) 118-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pohl AL, Griebel L, Trill R. Contemporary eHealth literacy research - an overview with focus on Germany. Paper presented at: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Padova, Italy; March 20, 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Ministry of Health - Ethiopia. Health sector transformation plan (HSTP). Published 2016. Accessed October 11, 2019 at: https://www.globalfinancingfacility.org/sites/gff_new/files/documents/HSTPEthiopia.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Ministry of Health - Ethiopia. Information revolution (IR) | FMOH. Accessed March 6, 2019 at: http://www.moh.gov.et/am/node/159
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Federal Ministry of Health - Nigeria. Nigeria Health Information System Policy. Published 2014. Accessed January 2, 2020 at: https://ehealth4everyone.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Nig-Health-Info.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Minister of State for Planning - Kenya. Kenya Vision 2030: a globally competitive and prosperous Kenya. 2007 . Accessed November 6, 2019 at: https://www.researchictafrica.net/countries/kenya/Kenya_Vision_2030_-_2007.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Ministry of Health - Republic of Mali. Politique Nationale Cybersanté au Mali. Published 2013. Accessed March 2, 2020 at: https://www.who.int/goe/policies/mali_cybersante_2013.pdf
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Thuy LTB, Lan NH. eHealth literacy of medical students in University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Vietnam. airiti Libr 2018; 12 (02) 1-3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 University of Gondar Official Website » College of Medicine & Health Sciences. Published 2015. Accessed February 9, 2020 at: http://www.uog.edu.et/academic-units/college-of-medicine/
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Yang SC, Luo YF, Chiang CH. The associations among individual factors, ehealth literacy, and health-promoting lifestyles among college students. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (01) e15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hsu W, Chiang C, Yang S. The effect of individual factors on health behaviors among college students: the mediating effects of eHealth literacy. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16 (12) e287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale. J Med Internet Res 2006; 8 (04) e27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Petrič G, Atanasova S, Kamin T. Ill literates or illiterates? Investigating the eHealth literacy of users of online health communities. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (10) e331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Seçkin G, Yeatts D, Hughes S, Hudson C, Bell V. Being an informed consumer of health information and assessment of electronic health literacy in a national sample of internet users: validity and reliability of the e-HLS instrument. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (07) e161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kayser L, Karnoe A, Furstrand D. et al. A multidimensional tool based on the eHealth literacy framework: development and initial validity testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ). J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (02) e36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Karnoe A, Kayser L. How is eHealth literacy measured and what do the measurements tell us? A systematic review. Knowledge Management & E-Learning 2015; 7 (04) 576
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zajacova A, Dowd JB. Reliability of self-rated health in US adults. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 174 (08) 977-983
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Trends in leisure-time physical inactivity by age, sex, and race/ethnicity–United States, 1994–2004. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005; 54 (39) 991-994
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Choi NG, Dinitto DM. The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15 (05) e93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Kaiser J. Dealing with missing values in data. J Syst Integr 2014; 5 (01) 42-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess 2003; 80 (01) 99-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ghaddar SF, Valerio MA, Garcia CM, Hansen L. Adolescent health literacy: the importance of credible sources for online health information. J Sch Health 2012; 82 (01) 28-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Tonsaker T, Bartlett G, Trpkov C. Health information on the Internet: gold mine or minefield?. Can Fam Physician 2014; 60 (05) 407-408
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Setia MS. Methodology series module 3: cross-sectional studies. Indian J Dermatol 2016; 61 (03) 261-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Pew Research Center. Internet/Broadband Fact Sheet. Published 2019. Accessed June 3, 2020 at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/#internet-use-over-time
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Park H, Park H. eHealth literacy skills among undergraduate nursing students in the U.S. and South Korea. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016; 225: 899-900
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Tubaishat A, Habiballah L. eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2016; 42: 47-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Rathnayake S, Senevirathna A. Self-reported eHealth literacy skills among nursing students in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today 2019; 78: 50-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Pokharel PK, Budhathoki SS, Pokharel HP. Electronic health literacy skills among medical and dental interns at B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2016; 14 (34) 159-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P&T 2014; 39 (05) 356-364
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Jebraeily M, Fazlollahi ZZ, Rahimi B. The most common smartphone applications used by medical students and barriers of using them. Acta Inform Med 2017; 25 (04) 232-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Salaffi F, Farah S, Di Carlo M. Smartphone APPlications in the clinical care and management of Rheumatic Diseases. Acta Biomed 2018; 89 (01) 7-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Haskins BL, Lesperance D, Gibbons P, Boudreaux ED. A systematic review of smartphone applications for smoking cessation. Transl Behav Med 2017; 7 (02) 292-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Do TTT, Le MD, Van Nguyen T. et al. Receptiveness and preferences of health-related smartphone applications among Vietnamese youth and young adults. BMC Public Health 2018; 18 (01) 764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Chen J, Lieffers J, Bauman A, Hanning R, Allman-Farinelli M. The use of smartphone health apps and other mobile health (mHealth) technologies in dietetic practice: a three country study. J Hum Nutr Diet 2017; 30 (04) 439-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Alexander S, Ng YC, Frith KH. Integration of mobile health applications in health information technology initiatives: expanding opportunities for nurse participation in population health. CIN -. Comput Inform Nurs 2018; 36 (05) 209-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Paige SR, Stellefson M, Krieger JL, Anderson-Lewis C, Cheong J, Stopka C. Proposing a transactional model of eHealth literacy: concept analysis. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (10) e10175
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Mihara S, Osaki Y, Nakayama H. et al. Internet use and problematic Internet use among adolescents in Japan: a nationwide representative survey. Addict Behav Rep 2016; 4: 58-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Tsitsika A, Critselis E, Kormas G. et al. Internet use and misuse: a multivariate regression analysis of the predictive factors of internet use among Greek adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 2009; 168 (06) 655-665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Viviani M, Pasi G. Credibility in social media: opinions, news, and health information—a survey. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 2017; 7 (05) e1209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Mitsutake S, Shibata A, Ishii K, Oka K. Associations of eHealth literacy with health behavior among adult internet users. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (07) e192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar