CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2021; 13(01): e26-e31
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725582
Research Article

Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery Performed by Resident and Attending Surgeons

1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
,
Daniel W. Knoch
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
,
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study received its financial support from an unrestricted grant of Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. (New York City, NY).

Abstract

Objective The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of resident surgeons performing femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).

Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison from postgraduate year four residents performing FLACS between 2017 and 2019. Data were also collected from residents performing manual cataract surgery, and attending surgeons performing FLACS for comparison. Recorded data included patient demographics, pre- and postoperative visual acuity, pre- and postoperative spherical equivalent, nuclear sclerotic cataract grade, ocular and systemic comorbidities, intraocular lens, duration of surgery, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), and intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Results A total of 90 cases were reviewed with 30 resident manual cases, 30 resident FLACS cases, and 30 attending FLACS cases. Resident manual (25.5 ± 6.8 minutes) and resident FLACS (17.5 ± 7.1 minutes) cases took a significantly longer time to complete compared with attending FLACS cases (13.6 ± 4.4 minutes; p < 0.001). There was higher CDE in resident FLACS and resident manual cases compared with attending FLACS cases, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). Postoperative visual acuity was not statistically different at 1-day and 1-month after surgery among the three groups. Resident FLACS complications, which included one case requiring an intraoperative suture to close the wound, two cases with intraoperative corneal abrasions, two cases with postoperative ocular hypertension, and one case with cystoid macular edema, were not significantly greater than attending FLACS complications (p = 0.30).

Conclusion The FLACS performed by resident surgeons had comparable visual acuity outcomes to FLACS performed by attending surgeons, and to manual cataract surgery performed by resident surgeons. However, resident FLACS cases took significantly longer time to complete, and they were associated with a higher CDE and minor complication rate compared with attending FLACS cases. Introducing advanced technologies into surgical training curricula improves resident preparedness for independent practice, and this study suggests FLACS can be incorporated safely and effectively into resident education.

Note

This study was conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by institutional review boards at the University of Wisconsin.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 14 June 2020

Accepted: 18 November 2020

Article published online:
26 February 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Randleman JB, Wolfe JD, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Cherwek DH, Srivastava SK. The resident surgeon phacoemulsification learning curve. Arch Ophthalmol 2007; 125 (09) 1215-1219
  • 2 Taravella MJ, Davidson R, Erlanger M, Guiton G, Gregory D. Characterizing the learning curve in phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37 (06) 1069-1075
  • 3 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Review Committee for Ophthalmology. Required Minimum Number of Procedures for Graduating Residents in Ophthalmology. Accessed April 21, 2020 at: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/240_National_Report_Program_Version_2018-2019.pdf
  • 4 Lotfipour M, Rolius R, Lehman EB, Pantanelli SM, Scott IU. Trends in cataract surgery training curricula. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43 (01) 49-53
  • 5 He L, Sheehy K, Culbertson W. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011; 22 (01) 43-52
  • 6 Nagy ZZ. New technology update: femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 2014; 8: 1157-1167
  • 7 Ewe SY, Abell RG, Vote BJ. Femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification for cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation: clinical outcomes review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2018; 29 (01) 54-60
  • 8 Nagy ZZ, Mastropasqua L, Knorz MC. The use of femtosecond lasers in cataract surgery: review of the published results with the LenSx system. J Refract Surg 2014; 30 (11) 730-740
  • 9 Bali SJ, Hodge C, Lawless M, Roberts TV, Sutton G. Early experience with the femtosecond laser for cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2012; 119 (05) 891-899
  • 10 Roberts TV, Lawless M, Bali SJ, Hodge C, Sutton G. Surgical outcomes and safety of femtosecond laser cataract surgery: a prospective study of 1500 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (02) 227-233
  • 11 Brunin G, Khan K, Biggerstaff KS, Wang L, Koch DD, Khandelwal SS. Outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery performed by surgeons-in-training. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 255 (04) 805-809
  • 12 Yeu E, Reeves SW, Wang L, Randleman JB, Yeu E. ASCRS Young Physicians and Residents Clinical Committee. Resident surgical experience with lens and corneal refractive surgery: survey of the ASCRS Young Physicians and Residents Membership. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39 (02) 279-284
  • 13 Yen AJ, Ramanathan S. Advanced cataract learning experience in United States ophthalmology residency programs. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43 (10) 1350-1355
  • 14 Shah RD, Sullivan BR. Resident training in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: national survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41 (07) 1531-1533
  • 15 Tiew S, Lim C, Sivagnanasithiyar T. Using an excel spreadsheet to convert Snellen visual acuity to LogMAR visual acuity. Eye (Lond) 2020; 34 (11) 2148-2149
  • 16 Pittner AC, Sullivan BR. Resident surgeon efficiency in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 2017; 11: 291-297
  • 17 Lubahn JG, Donaldson KE, Culbertson WW, Yoo SH. Operating times of experienced cataract surgeons beginning femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40 (11) 1773-1776
  • 18 Chang JSM, Chen IN, Chan WM, Ng JCM, Chan VKC, Law AKP. Initial evaluation of a femtosecond laser system in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40 (01) 29-36
  • 19 Hou JH, Prickett AL, Cortina MS, Jain S, de la Cruz J. Safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery performed by surgeons in training. J Refract Surg 2015; 31 (01) 69-70
  • 20 Christy JS, Nath M, Mouttapa F, Venkatesh R. Learning Curve of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Experience of surgeons new to femtosecond laser platform. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017; 65 (08) 638-689
  • 21 Cohen MN, Intili A, Ni N, Blecher MH. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in residency training. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2015; 26 (01) 56-60