CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2021; 15(03): 533-538
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723068
Original Article

Final Endodontic Irrigation with 2% Peracetic Acid: Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity

Daniel de Oliveira Brandão-Neto
1   Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
,
João Victor Zebende Mello
2   School of Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
,
Marilia Fagury Videira Marceliano-Alves
3   Post Graduation Program in Dentistry and Research, Iguaçu University, Nova Iguaçu, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
,
Thais Machado de Carvalho Coutinho
3   Post Graduation Program in Dentistry and Research, Iguaçu University, Nova Iguaçu, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
,
Eduardo Fagury Videira Marceliano
4   Dental Clinic Department, Brazilian Army General Hospital of Belem, Belem, Brazil.
,
Michelle Paiva Weydt Galhardi
5   Department of Dental Materials, Sao Jose University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
,
Vívian Souza Tavares
2   School of Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
,
Aline Peçanha Muzy Dias
2   School of Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
,
Renata Ximenes Lins
1   Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was supported by grants from Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), a Brazilian governmental institution.

Abstract

Objective The aim of present study was to assess the cytotoxicity and antimicrobial efficacy of 2% peracetic acid (PAA) compared with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 2% chlorhexidine (CHX).

Material and Methods For the cytotoxicity test, 100 µl of the tested solutions were added in 12 wells with ECV 304 endothelial cells in each group: NaOCl, CHX, and PAA, in addition to the control group. Each solution was evaluated after 24 hours of contact in four dilutions: 0.2, 0.1, 0.05 and 0.025 through mitochondrial function using MTT colorimetric assay. In the antimicrobial evaluation, 40 dentin blocks 5 mm in length and 0.2 g in weight were incubated with 400 µl of Enterococcus faecalis suspension for 21 days at 37°C. The contaminated samples were divided into three experimental groups within 5 minutes of contact: NaOCl group, CHX group, PAA group, as well as the positive control group. The specimens received treatment and were transferred to a tube with saline for serial dilution of the solution and seeding for isolation and colony forming unit (CFU) count.

Statistical Analysis The results obtained were expressed as mean (A570 nm) ± standard deviation (SD) and in a multiple linear regression model and multiple comparisons conducted.

Results The antimicrobial evaluation revealed that the NaOCl and CHX groups showed a statistically significant difference compared with the control group (p < 0.001), while the PAA reduced only the CFU growth. It can be concluded that, among the agents tested, PAA expressed greater cell viability, followed by CHX and NaOCl. However, it did not show greater antimicrobial activity in vitro in the mature biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis.



Publication History

Article published online:
03 February 2021

© 2021. European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Mohammadi Z. An update on the antibiotic-based root canal irrigation solutions. Iran Endod J 2008; 3 (02) 1-7
  • 2 Plotino G, Cortese T, Grande NM. et al. New technologies to improve root canal disinfection. Braz Dent J 2016; 27 (01) 3-8
  • 3 Hage W, De Moor RJG, Hajj D, Sfeir G, Sarkis DK, Zogheib C. Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals. Dent J (Basel) 2019; 7 (03) 64
  • 4 Siqueira Jr JF, Araújo MC, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJ. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod 1997; 23 (08) 499-502
  • 5 Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997; 30 (05) 297-306
  • 6 Siqueira Jr JF. Endodontic infections: concepts, paradigms, and perspectives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94 (03) 281-293
  • 7 Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J 2014; 216 (06) 299-303
  • 8 Viola KS, Rodrigues EM, Tanomaru-Filho M. et al. Cytotoxicity of peracetic acid: evaluation of effects on metabolism, structure and cell death. Int Endod J 2018; 51 (Suppl. 04) e264-e277
  • 9 Alkahtani A, Alkahtany SM, Anil S. An in vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of varying concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on human mesenchymal stem cells. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15 (04) 473-481
  • 10 Farook SA, Shah V, Lenouvel D. et al. Corrigendum. Practice article (BDJ 2014; 217: 679-684). Guidelines for management of sodium hypochlorite extrusion injuries. Br Dent J 2015; 218 (04) 230
  • 11 Mariotti A, Cochran DL. Characterization of fibroblasts derived from human periodontal ligament and gingiva. J Periodontol 1990; 61 (02) 103-111
  • 12 Yasuda Y, Tatematsu Y, Fujii S. et al. Effect of MTAD on the differentiation of osteoblast-like cells. J Endod 2010; 36 (02) 260-263
  • 13 Dioguardi M, Gioia GD, Illuzzi G, Laneve E, Cocco A, Troiano G. Endodontic irrigants: Different methods to improve efficacy and related problems. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (03) 459-466
  • 14 Moradi Eslami L, Vatanpour M, Aminzadeh N, Mehrvarzfar P, Taheri S. The comparison of intracanal medicaments, diode laser and photodynamic therapy on removing the biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans in the root canal system (ex-vivo study). Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2019; 26: 157-161
  • 15 Silva EJNL, Carvalho CR, Belladonna FG. et al. Micro-CT evaluation of different final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from isthmus-containing mesial root of mandibular molars. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23 (02) 681-687
  • 16 Pechacek N, Osorio M, Caudill J, Peterson B. Evaluation of the toxicity data for peracetic acid in deriving occupational exposure limits: a minireview. Toxicol Lett 2015; 233 (01) 45-57
  • 17 Moor K, Wotzka SY, Toska A, Diard M, Hapfelmeier S, Slack E. Peracetic acid treatment generates potent in activated oral vaccines from a broad range of culturable bacterial species. Front Immunol 2016; 7: 34
  • 18 Tuna SH, Keyf F, Gumus HO, Uzun C. The evaluation of water sorption/solubility on various acrylic resins. Eur J Dent 2008; 2 (03) 191-197
  • 19 Chassot AL, Poisl MI, Samuel SM. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of the efficacy of a peracetic acid-based disinfectant for decontamination of acrylic resins. Braz Dent J 2006; 17 (02) 117-121
  • 20 Karkehabadi H, Yousefifakhr H, Zadsirjan S. Cytotoxicity of endodontic irrigants on human periodontal ligament cells. Iran Endod J 2018; 13 (03) 390-394
  • 21 Teixeira PA, Coelho MS, Kato AS, Fontana CE, Bueno CE, Pedro-Rocha DG. Cytotoxicity assessment of 1% peracetic acid, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA on FG11 and FG15 human fibroblasts. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2018; 31 (01) 11-15
  • 22 Bhasin P, Sharma M, Bindal D, Tomar D, Sarin A, Sharma N. An in vitro evaluation of antimicrobial effects of three different root canal irrigating solutions against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (02) 221-225
  • 23 Thomas AR, Mani R, Reddy TV, Ravichandran A, Sivakumar M, Krishnakumar S. Evaluation of the antibacterial efficiency of a combination of 1% alexidine and sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm models: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (09) 1090-1094
  • 24 Mostafa MEHAA, El-Shrief YAI, Anous WIO. et al. Postoperative pain following endodontic irrigation using 1.3% versus 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in mandibular molars with necrotic pulps: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Int Endod J 2020; 53 (02) 154-166
  • 25 Ashraf H, Najafi F, Heidari S, Yadegary Z, Zadsirjan S. Cytotoxicity of two experimental epoxy resin-based sealers. Iran Endod J 2018; 13 (02) 257-262
  • 26 Coaguila-Llerena H, Vaisberg A, Velásquez-Huamán Z. In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of three root-end filling materials in human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Braz Dent J 2016; 27 (02) 187-191
  • 27 Bajrami D, Hoxha V, Gorduysus O, Muftuoglu S, Zeybek ND, Küçükkaya S. Cytotoxic effect of endodontic irrigants in vitro. Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2014; 20: 22-26
  • 28 De Deus G, Ximenes R, Gurgel-Filho ED, Plotkowski MC, Coutinho-Filho T. Cytotoxicity of MTA and Portland cement on human ECV 304 endothelial cells. Int Endod J 2005; 38 (09) 604-609
  • 29 Pithon MM, dos Santos RL, Judice RL, de Assuncao PS, Restle L. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of elastomeric ligatures after sterilisation with 0.25% peracetic acid. Aust Orthod J 2013; 29 (02) 139-144
  • 30 Soto AF, Arthur RA, Kapczinski MP, Lamers ML, Mengatto CM. Keratinocyte cytotoxicity of peracetic acid used as sterilizing agent for implant scaffolds. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 83 (01) 99-103
  • 31 Scott II MB, Zilinski GS, Kirkpatrick TC, Himel VT, Sabey KA, Lallier TE. The effects of irrigants on the survival of human stem cells of the apical papilla, including endocyn. J Endod 2018; 44 (02) 263-268
  • 32 Keine KC, Kuga MC, Tormin FBC. et al. Effect of peracetic acid used as single irrigant on the smear layer, adhesion, and penetrability of AH Plus. Braz Oral Res 2019; 33: e057
  • 33 Lins RX, Hirata Jr R, Wilson M, O Lewis MA, Fidel RAS, Williams D. Comparison of genotypes, antimicrobial resistance and virulence profiles of oral and non oral Enterococcus faceais from Brazil, Japan and the United Kingdom. J Dent 2019; 84:49–54.
  • 34 Chiniforush N, Pourhajibagher M, Shahabi S, Kosarieh E, Bahador A. Can antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) enhance the endodontic treatment?. J Lasers Med Sci 2016; 7 (02) 76-85
  • 35 Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effectiveness of endodontic disinfecting solutions against young and old Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in dentin canals. J Endod 2012; 38 (10) 1376-1379
  • 36 Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, Espigares-García M, Baca P. Enterococcus faecalis biofilms eradication by root canal irrigants. J Endod 2009; 35 (05) 711-714
  • 37 Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Morgental RD, Faria-Junior NB, Berbert FL, Tanomaru-Filho M. Antibacterial effectiveness of peracetic acid and conventional endodontic irrigants. Braz Dent J 2011; 22 (04) 285-287
  • 38 Slaughter RJ, Watts M, Vale JA, Grieve JR, Schep LJ. The clinical toxicology of sodium hypochlorite. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2019; 57 (05) 303-311
  • 39 Wang CS, Arnold RR, Trope M, Teixeira FB. Clinical efficiency of 2% chlorhexidine gel in reducing intracanal bacteria. J Endod 2007; 33 (11) 1283-1289
  • 40 Neelakantan P, Herrera DR, Pecorari VGA, Gomes BPFA. Endotoxin levels after chemomechanical preparation of root canals with sodium hypochlorite or chlorhexidine: a systematic review of clinical trials and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2019; 52 (01) 19-27