PDF herunterladen
Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(03): 340-347
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722906
Original Research

The Rhino-Lip-Lifting: A Novel Proposal for Midface Profileplasty Performed as a Single Surgical Procedure

Michele Pascali
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Lazio, Italy
,
Gloria Marchese
2   Private Consultant, Rome, Italy
,
Alberto Diaspro 
3   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Rigeneralab Center for Regenerative Medicine, Torino, Italy
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

As facial aging occurs, aesthetic changes of the nasal tip and the senile upper lip include tip ptosis, increase in skin length, loss of vermillion height and Cupid's bow, and vertical wrinkles.

Regardless of the rejuvenation procedure, the lips are not to be considered as a single anatomical entity, instead they should be placed in a strong correlation with the nose. The aim of this study is therefore to demonstrate the effectiveness of the association of primary closed rhinoplasty together with indirect subnasal lip-lifting technique.

A total of 45 patients were enrolled in this study and underwent primary closed rhinoplasty with indirect subnasal lip-lifting. The result showed an overall average nasolabial angle width reduction of 10.9% and lip length shortening of 23.5%, as assessed 1 year after the surgical procedure. When comparing before and after photographs and using the Subjective Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (sGAIS), the overall satisfaction was rated 4.4 on 5, as “much improved.”

The authors show that lips should not be considered as a single anatomical entity but that they indeed must be placed in a strong correlation with the nose since a droopy nasal tip is likely to be considered unattractive and is often associated with the appearance of a long nose with covered philtrum and upper lip.

Tip rotation to a normal nasolabial angle width could grant a beneficial impact on overall nose aesthetics; however, it may not fully balance the midface profile as it is the “lip position-to-incisal show” ratio that defines beauty, whereas the balance among forehead, nasal tip, upper lip, and chin is what defines the contour of harmonious profiles.

This is the first patient series to show that the combination of closed rhinoplasty and indirect lip-lifting is a highly effective, safe, and reliable procedure to address profile rejuvenation.

Keywords

nose - lip - lifting


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Guerrissi JO, Sanchez LI. An approach to the senile upper lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (06) 1187-1191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Harris R, Nagarkar P, Amirlak B. Varied definitions of nasolabial angle: searching for consensus among rhinoplasty surgeons and an algorithm for selecting the ideal method. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (06) e752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mommaerts MY, Moerenhout BA. Ideal proportions in full face front view, contemporary versus antique. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011; 39 (02) 107-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fanous N. Correction of thin lips: “lip lift”. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74 (01) 33-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Austin HW. The lip lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (06) 990-994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Spiegel JH. The modified bullhorn approach for the lip-lift. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019; 21 (01) 69-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Moragas JS, Vercruysse HJ, Mommaerts MY. “Non-filling” procedures for lip augmentation: a systematic review of contemporary techniques and their outcomes. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 (06) 943-952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Raphael P, Harris R, Harris SW. The endonasal lip lift: personal technique. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (03) 457-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Guyuron B, Behmand RA. Nasal tip sutures part II: the interplays. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (04) 1130-1145 , discussion 1146–1149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gunter JP, Landecker A, Cochran CS. Frequently used grafts in rhinoplasty: nomenclature and analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (01) 14e-29e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rohrich RJ, Hoxworth RE, Kurkjian TJ. The role of the columellar strut in rhinoplasty: indications and rationale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (01) 118e-125e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Pasinato R. et al. Pre and post-operative facial angles in patients submitted to rhinoplasty. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 12 (03) 393-396
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tasman AJ, Lohuis PJ. Control of tip rotation. Facial Plast Surg 2012; 28 (02) 243-250
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Perkins K, Shah A, Patel A, Steinbacher D. The effect of nasal tip rotation on upper lip length. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (05) 504-510
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Spiegel JH, Spiegel OL. Lip Lifting: not just fullness-everything you need to know about lifting and creating youthful, beautiful lips. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (02) 129-133
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nagarkar P, Stark RY, Pezeshk RA, Amirlak B, Rohrich RJ. Role of the cephalic trim in modern rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 89-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Boccieri A, Sciuto S, Cervelli V, Pascali M. Dome division: a viable technique today?. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (06) 664-670
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Foda HMT. Management of the droopy tip: a comparison of three alar cartilage-modifying techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (05) 1408-1417 , discussion 1418–1421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sito G, Consolini L, Trévidic P. Proposed guide to lip treatment in Caucasian women using objective and measurable parameters. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (12) NP474-NP483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Zankl A, Eberle L, Molinari L, Schinzel A. Growth charts for nose length, nasal protrusion, and philtrum length from birth to 97 years. Am J Med Genet 2002; 111 (04) 388-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Klein AW. In search of the perfect lip: 2005. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31 (11 Pt 2): 1599-1603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Niamtu III J. New lip and wrinkle fillers. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2005; 17 (01) 17-28 , v
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Iblher N, Kloepper J, Penna V, Bartholomae JP, Stark GB. Changes in the aging upper lip--a photomorphometric and MRI-based study (on a quest to find the right rejuvenation approach). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (10) 1170-1176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Aiache AE. Rejuvenation of the perioral area. Dermatol Clin 1997; 15 (04) 665-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Popenko NA, Tripathi PB, Devcic Z, Karimi K, Osann K, Wong BJF. A quantitative approach to determining the ideal female lip aesthetic and its effect on facial attractiveness. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (04) 261-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Guerrissi JO. Surgical treatment of the senile upper lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (04) 938-940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kosins AM, Lambros V, Daniel RK. The plunging tip: analysis and surgical treatment. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (04) 367-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Toriumi DM, Checcone MA. New concepts in nasal tip contouring. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (01) 55-90 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rohrich RJ, Liu JH. Defining the infratip lobule in rhinoplasty: anatomy, pathogenesis of abnormalities, and correction using an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) 1148-1158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Cachay-Velásquez H. Rhinoplasty and facial expression. Ann Plast Surg 1992; 28 (05) 427-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Shindoi JM, Matsumoto Y, Sato Y, Ono T, Harada K. Soft tissue cephalometric norms for orthognathic and cosmetic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71 (01) e24-e30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod 1990; 60 (03) 177-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Echo A, Momoh AO, Yuksel E. The no-scar lip-lift: upper lip suspension technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35 (04) 617-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Mommaerts MY, Blythe JN. Rejuvenation of the ageing upper lip and nose with suspension lifting. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44 (09) 1123-1125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Arli C, Bilgic F, Kaya A, Arpag OF. Effects of rhinoplasty on smile esthetic and gingival appearance. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (03) 689-691
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Üstün GG, Konaş E, El H. et al. The effects of maxillary movements on nasal aesthetics following orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (03) 796-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Xia TY, Punjabi A, Oh JH, Wee C, Guyuron B. Updated dynamics of rhinoplasty: a review of the literature and comprehensive list of the findings. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (03) 904-909
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Bessler S. Combining rhinoplasty with upper lip-lift using a single incision line. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (02) 166-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Insalaco L, Spiegel JH. Safety of simultaneous lip-lift and open rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (02) 160-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 ISAPS International Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures. Access on April 2020 https://www.isaps.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ISAPSGlobal-Survey-Results-2018-new.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Bertossi D, Albanese M, Malchiodi L, Procacci P, Nocini PF. Surgical alar base management with a personal technique: the tightening alar base suture. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (04) 248-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar