Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722694
Mechanical Alignment in Knee Replacement Homogenizes Postoperative Coronal Hip–Knee–Ankle Angle in Varus Knees: A Navigation-Based Study
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jks/202212/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0040-1722694_200410oa-1.jpg)
Abstract
After knee replacement, postoperative lower limb alignment is influenced by the geometry of the prosthesis position and surrounding soft tissue that contributes to the hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle. The purpose of this study is to determine the dynamic coronal HKA angle after mechanical alignment in total knee replacement using computer navigation. We conducted a pre–post design study of 71 patients with varus osteoarthritic knees on which total knee arthroplasty was performed. The HKA was measured before and at the end of the surgical procedure with the patient in the supine position using a navigation system at 30, 60, and 90 degrees of knee flexion. Postoperative implant position and flexion and extension gaps were assessed. HKA was clustered in three preoperative dynamic patterns (PDPs; Varus-Neutral, Varus-Valgus, and Varus-Varus). There were statistically significant differences in the dynamic coronal HKA between the preoperative and postoperative statuses after mechanically aligned knee replacement (with p < 0.0001) Before the surgical procedure, statistically significant differences were found between patterns at any angle of flexion confirming a well-differentiated preoperative dynamic behavior between the three groups. Postoperatively, 98.6% (71 out of 72) of the knees were within ± 3 degrees of the HKA at full extension. Fifty-eight knees (80.6%) were assessed to a “within-range” postoperative dynamic alignment at any grade of flexion considered. There are differences between the preoperative and postoperative status of the dynamic coronal HKA angle after mechanically aligned knee replacement. We proposed that an excellent dynamic HKA alignment is achieved not only at full extension within the range of 0 ± 3 degrees but also when this alignment is maintained at 30, 60, and 90 degrees.
Keywords
computer assisted - arthroplasty - replacement - knee - femorotibial mechanical angle - dynamic alignmentPublication History
Received: 30 July 2020
Accepted: 29 November 2020
Article published online:
20 January 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Nowakowski AM, Kamphausen M, Pagenstert G, Valderrabano V, Müller-Gerbl M. Influence of tibial slope on extension and flexion gaps in total knee arthroplasty: increasing the tibial slope affects both gaps. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (10) 2071-2077
- 2 Tanaka K, Muratsu H, Mizuno K, Kuroda R, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M. Soft tissue balance measurement in anterior cruciate ligament-resected knee joint: cadaveric study as a model for cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2007; 12 (02) 149-153
- 3 D'Lima DD, Chen PC, Colwell Jr CW. Polyethylene contact stresses, articular congruity, and knee alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (392) 232-238
- 4 Mihalko WM, Saleh KJ, Krackow KA, Whiteside LA. Soft-tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty in the varus knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17 (12) 766-774
- 5 Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclercq V, Hess S. Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1385-1393
- 6 Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclerq V, Hess S. Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1394-1402
- 7 Hirschmann MT, Hess S, Behrend H, Amsler F, Leclercq V, Moser LB. Phenotyping of hip-knee-ankle angle in young non-osteoarthritic knees provides better understanding of native alignment variability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1378-1384
- 8 Hess S, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Hirschmann MT. Highly variable coronal tibial and femoral alignment in osteoarthritic knees: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1368-1377
- 9 Hochreiter B, Moser LB, Hess S, Hirschmann MT, Amsler F, Behrend H. Osteoarthritic knees have a highly variable patellofemoral alignment: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29 (02) 483-490
- 10 Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (12) 2143-2149
- 11 Slevin O, Hirschmann A, Schiapparelli FF, Amsler F, Huegli RW, Hirschmann MT. Neutral alignment leads to higher knee society scores after total knee arthroplasty in preoperatively non-varus patients: a prospective clinical study using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (06) 1602-1609
- 12 Slevin O, Amsler F, Hirschmann MT. No correlation between coronal alignment of total knee arthroplasty and clinical outcomes: a prospective clinical study using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (12) 3892-3900
- 13 Oussedik S, Abdel MP, Victor J, Pagnano MW, Haddad FS. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B (03) 276-279
- 14 Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. Native knee laxities at 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion and their relationship to the goal of the gap-balancing alignment method of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (20) 1678-1684
- 15 Deep K, Picard F, Clarke JV. Dynamic knee alignment and collateral knee laxity and its variations in normal humans. Front Surg 2015; 2 (November): 62
- 16 Larrainzar-Garijo R, Murillo-Vizuete D, Garcia-Bogalo R, Escobar-Anton D, Horna-Castiñeiras L, Peralta-Molero JV. Dynamic alignment analysis in the osteoarthritic knee using computer navigation. J Knee Surg 2017; 30 (09) 909-915
- 17 Pang H-NN, Yeo S-JJ, Chong H-CC, Chin P-LL, Ong J, Lo N-NN. Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (09) 1496-1503
- 18 Peters CL, Jimenez C, Erickson J, Anderson MB, Pelt CE. Lessons learned from selective soft-tissue release for gap balancing in primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 1216 consecutive total knee arthroplasties: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (20) e152
- 19 Stiehl JB, Heck DA. How precise is computer-navigated gap assessment in TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (01) 115-118
- 20 Tan KG, Sathappan SS, Teo YH, Low WCJ. Alignment analyses in the varus osteoarthritic knee using computer navigation. Am J Orthop 2015; 44 (06) 277-283
- 21 Baier C, Fitz W, Craiovan B. et al. Improved kinematics of total knee replacement following partially navigated modified gap-balancing technique. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (02) 243-249
- 22 Ismailidis P, Kuster MS, Jost B, Giesinger K, Behrend H. Clinical outcome of increased flexion gap after total knee arthroplasty. Can controlled gap imbalance improve knee flexion?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (06) 1705-1711
- 23 Roßkopf J, Singh PK, Wolf P, Strauch M, Graichen H. Influence of intentional femoral component flexion in navigated TKA on gap balance and sagittal anatomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (03) 687-693
- 24 Seo S-S, Seo J-H, Sohn M-W, Kim Y-J. Differences in measurement of lower limb alignment among different registration methods of navigation and radiographs in TKA using the OrthoPilot system. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (Suppl. 10) 50-55
- 25 Thiese MS. Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014; 24 (02) 199-210
- 26 Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A. Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 1994; 25 (03) 425-465
- 27 Victor JMK, Bassens D, Bellemans J, Gürsu S, Dhollander AAM, Verdonk PCM. Constitutional varus does not affect joint line orientation in the coronal plane. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (01) 98-104
- 28 Paternostre F, Schwab P-E, Thienpont E. The combined Whiteside's and posterior condylar line as a reliable reference to describe axial distal femoral anatomy in patient-specific instrument planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (12) 3054-3059
- 29 Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (01) 45-53
- 30 Koh IJ, Park IJ, Lin CC. et al. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces native patellofemoral biomechanics during deep knee flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1520-1528
- 31 Paternostre F, Schwab P-E, Thienpont E. The difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing alignment in patient-specific instrumentation planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (03) 674-679
- 32 Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (07) 907-913
- 33 Deep K, Eachempati KK, Apsingi S. The dynamic nature of alignment and variations in normal knees. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B (04) 498-502
- 34 Deep K, Norris M, Smart C, Senior C. Radiographic measurement of joint space height in non-osteoarthritic tibiofemoral joints. A comparison of weight-bearing extension and 30 degrees flexion views. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (07) 980-982
- 35 Mooney LT, Smith A, Sloan K, Clark GW. The effect of the native kinematics of the knee on the outcome following total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (11) 1471-1478
- 36 Wilson WTT, Deakin AHH, Wearing SCC, Payne APP, Clarke JVV, Picard F. Computer-assisted measurements of coronal knee joint laxity in vitro are related to low-stress behavior rather than structural properties of the collateral ligaments. Comput Aided Surg 2013; 18 (5-6): 181-186
- 37 Kozanek M, Hosseini A, Liu F. et al. Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait. J Biomech 2009; 42 (12) 1877-1884
- 38 Baldwin MA, Clary CW, Fitzpatrick CK, Deacy JS, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ. Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics. J Biomech 2012; 45 (03) 474-483
- 39 Fitzpatrick CK, Baldwin MA, Clary CW, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ. Evaluating knee replacement mechanics during ADL with PID-controlled dynamic finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2014; 17 (04) 360-369
- 40 Stindel E, Briard JL, Merloz P. et al. Bone morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 2002; 7 (03) 156-168
- 41 Liau JJ, Cheng CK, Huang CH, Lo WH. The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses--a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17 (02) 140-146
- 42 Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (404) 7-13
- 43 Zhao Z, Wang W, Wang S, Jiang L, Zhang S, Zhao Y. Femoral rotation influences dynamic alignment of the lower extremity in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (01) 55-60
- 44 Amaranath JE, Moopanar TR, Sorial RM. Defining distal femoral anatomy for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a magnetic resonance imaging-based study. ANZ J Surg 2014; 84 (11) 852-855
- 45 Mayr HO, Reinhold M, Hube R. et al. Rotational laxity and collateral ligament laxity following total knee arthroplasty with rotating platform. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (07) 1379-1386
- 46 Yang JH, Dahuja A, Kim JK, Yun SH, Yoon JR. Alignment in knee flexion position during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (08) 2422-2429
- 47 Picard F, Deakin AH, Clarke JV, Dillon JM, Gregori A. Using navigation intraoperative measurements narrows range of outcomes in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 463 (463) 50-57
- 48 Clarke JV, Wilson WT, Wearing SC, Picard F, Riches PE, Deakin AH. Standardising the clinical assessment of coronal knee laxity. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2012; 226 (09) 699-708
- 49 Matthews J, Chong A, McQueen D, O'Guinn J, Wooley P. Flexion-extension gap in cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Res 2014; 32 (05) 627-632
- 50 Tsuneizumi Y, Suzuki M, Miyagi J. et al. Evaluation of joint laxity against distal traction force upon flexion in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2008; 13 (06) 504-509
- 51 Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Tsumura N. et al. Joint gap kinematics in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty measured by a new tensor with the navigation system. J Biomech Eng 2006; 128 (06) 867-871