Diagnosis-Related Group Weight and Derived Case Mix Index to Assess the Complexity among Twins

Abstract

Objective Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) are used to summarize hospital morbidity and mortality. Each DRG has a weight which is important in calculating the case mix index (CMI), a numeric summary of disease complexity in a population of patients. We utilized DRG weight and resultant CMI to compare postnatal outcomes among singletons versus monochorionic and monoamniotic, monochorionic diamniotic, and dichorionic diamniotic twins.

Study Design This single-center and retrospective cohort study evaluated DRGs assigned by the investigators, birth weight, gestational age, length of stay (LOS), NICU admission rate, and mortality in twin births between 2014 and 2016. Twins were analyzed depending on chorionicity and amnionicity. Overall, 3 months of singleton births served as the control. The CMI derived from DRG weights were compared across groups.

Results Twins (n = 288) had lower gestational ages and birth weights and higher mortality, LOS, NICU admission rates and DRG weights/CMI compared with singletons (n = 327; p < 0.001 for each). The LOS was no different between twin subtypes; monochorionic monoamniotic twins had the highest mortality and DRG weight (p < 0.001).

Conclusion DRG weight and CMI values summarize in-hospital complexity and can be a useful tool to evaluate differences in care complexity among groups of patients.

Key Points

• Using diagnosis-related group and case mix index to assess morbidities.

• Morbidities of twins are monochorionic-monoamniotic versus monochorionic-diamniotic versus dichorionic-diamniotic twins.

• Only seven diagnosis-related group in neonatology make it a valuable tool for clinicians.

Keywords

diagnosis-related group - case mix index - twins - neonatology

Publication History

Received: 07 July 2020

Accepted: 16 November 2020

Article published online:
30 December 2020

• References

• 1 Fetter RB, Shin Y, Freeman JL, Averill RF, Thompson JD. Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Med Care 1980; 18 (2, Suppl): iii, 1–53
• 2 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Design and development of the diagnosis related group (DRGs). Accessed 2020 at: https://www.cms.gov/ICD10Manual/version35-fullcode-cms/fullcode_cms/P0001.html
• 3 Ehret DEY, Edwards EM, Greenberg LT. et al. Association of antenatal steroid exposure with survival among infants receiving postnatal life support at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1 (06) e183235
• 4 Oster ME, Lee KA, Honein MA, Riehle-Colarusso T, Shin M, Correa A. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatr 2013; 131 (05) e1502-e1508
• 5 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births in the United States, 2015. National vital statistics reports; vol 66 no 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015
• 6 Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB. et al. Centers for disease prevention (CDC). MMWR Surveill Summ 2017; 66 (06) 1-24
• 7 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS data brief, no 80. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012
• 8 Chambers GM, Hoang VP, Lee E. et al. Hospital costs of multiple-birth and singleton-birth children during the first 5 years of life and the role of assisted reproductive technology. JAMA Pediatr 2014; 168 (11) 1045-1053
• 9 Oldenburg A, Rode L, Bødker B. et al. Influence of chorionicity on perinatal outcome in a large cohort of Danish twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39 (01) 69-74
• 10 Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Green C, Higgins RD. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Intensive care for extreme prematurity--moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (16) 1672-1681
• 11 Cummings J. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Clinical report - antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation and intensive care before 25 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2015; 136 (03) 588-595
• 12 Sebire NJ, Snijders RJM, Hughes K, Sepulveda W, Nicolaides KH. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104 (10) 1203-1207
• 13 Minakami H, Honma Y, Matsubara S, Uchida A, Shiraishi H, Sato I. Effects of placental chorionicity on outcome in twin pregnancies. A cohort study. J Reprod Med 1999; 44 (07) 595-600
• 14 Sherer DM. Adverse perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: review of the literature. Am J Perinatol 2001; 18 (01) 23-37
• 15 Acosta-Rojas R, Becker J, Munoz-Abellana B, Ruiz C, Carreras E, Gratacos E. Catalunya and Balears Monochorionic Network. Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007; 96 (02) 98-102
• 16 Hack KE, Derks JB, Elias SG. et al. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG 2008; 115 (01) 58-67
• 17 Rutledge R, Osler T. The ICD-9-based illness severity score: a new model that outperforms both DRG and APR-DRG as predictors of survival and resource utilization. J Trauma 1998; 45 (04) 791-799
• 18 Tierney WM, Fitzgerald JF, Miller ME, James MK, McDonald CJ. Predicting inpatient costs with admitting clinical data. Med Care 1995; 33 (01) 1-14