PDF herunterladen
Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34(04): 254-259
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721761
Review Article

Secondary Reconstruction of the Zygomaticomaxillary Complex

Hessah M. Aman
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial, College of Dentistry, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Abdulrahman Alenezi
2   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada
,
Yadranko Ducic
3   Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas
,
Likith V. Reddy
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial, College of Dentistry, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Zygomaticomaxillary (ZMC) fractures are the second most common facial fractures after nasal bone fractures. The zygoma, with its location and multiple points of articulations, lends itself to both facial structure and esthetics. Secondary ZMC deformities are complications of inadequate primary correction, delayed repair, or lack of repair. Secondary revisions of ZMC aim to correct ZMC displacement and projection and to address orbital discrepancies. Extensive correction involving significant orbital and malar defects requires zygomatic repositioning osteotomies and would greatly benefit from the utilization of virtual surgical planning, intraoperative navigation, and imaging. Minor corrections in malar projection can be corrected by onlay grafting and soft tissue augmentation and resuspension. Isolated or minor orbital corrections can be managed by autogenous or alloplastic material to restore lost orbital volume and anatomy.

Keywords

ZMC - secondary reconstruction - enophthalmos - onlay graft - surgical navigation


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. Dezember 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Dorafshar A. Facial Trauma Surgery- From Primary Repair to Reconstruction. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier - Health Sciences Division; 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Yu H, Shen G, Wang X, Zhang S. Navigation-guided reduction and orbital floor reconstruction in the treatment of zygomatic-orbital-maxillary complex fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68 (01) 28-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chepurnyi Y, Chernogorskyi D, Kopchak A, Petrenko O. Clinical efficacy of peek patient-specific implants in orbital reconstruction. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2020; 10 (02) 49-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gerbino G, Zavattero E, Zenga F, Bianchi FA, Garzino-Demo P, Berrone S. Primary and secondary reconstruction of complex craniofacial defects using polyetheretherketone custom-made implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43 (08) 1356-1363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Malik AH, Shah AA, Ahmad I, Shah BA. Ocular injuries in patients of zygomatico-complex (ZMC) fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2017; 16 (02) 243-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pearl RM. Enophthalmos correction: Principles guiding proper treatment. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 5 (04) 352-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Manson PN, Grivas A, Rosenbaum A, Vannier M, Zinreich J, Iliff N. Studies on enophthalmos: II. The measurement of orbital injuries and their treatment by quantitative computed tomography. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (02) 203-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ebrahimi A, Kalantar Motamedi MH, Rasouli HR, Naghdi N. Enophthalmos and orbital volume changes in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: is there a correlation between them?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77 (01) 134.e1-134.e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kontio R, Lindqvist C. Management of orbital fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2009; 21 (02) 209-220 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ellis III E, Tan Y. Assessment of internal orbital reconstructions for pure blowout fractures: cranial bone grafts versus titanium mesh. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61 (04) 442-453
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Tideman H, Samman N, Cheung LK. Functional reconstruction of the mandible: a modified titanium mesh system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 27 (05) 339-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Liss J, Stefko ST, Chung WL. Orbital surgery: state of the art. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2010; 22 (01) 59-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Glassman RD, Manson PN, Vanderkolk CA. et al. Rigid fixation of internal orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (06) 1103-1109 , discussion 1110–1111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Romano JJ, Iliff NT, Manson PN. Use of Medpor porous polyethylene implants in 140 patients with facial fractures. J Craniofac Surg 1993; 4 (03) 142-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar