Description and Validation of an Innovative and Effective Hand-Shaped Suture-Training Model for Medical Students

Abstract

During medical education, medical students are often frustrated by difficulties in translating theoretical anatomical knowledge and basic surgical skills (suturing, tissue and instrument handling, and local anesthetic administration) into practice. A common etiological factor for this difficulty, among others, is lack of a low-cost and easy-to-assemble low fidelity suturing model. The purpose of this study is the demonstration of a validated, practical, inexpensive, hand-shaped anatomy training model. It is addressed to medical students and graduates that wish to get acquainted with neurovascular anatomy of the hand and improve their basic surgical skills. The model requires only two latex gloves, cotton, and two different color markers per trainee to draw the course of large nerve and vessels. Construction requires less than 15 minutes. For validation, 80 students participated as volunteers in the demonstration course. They evaluated course usefulness and their own confidence after the course. According to the 5-point Likert scale, the participants’ confidence increased in a statistically significant way (p < 0.05). All participants (100%) stated that their skills were “significantly improved” in terms of instrument handling, anatomy studying, performing digital anesthesia, and suturing technique. Overall experience was rated as “satisfactory” or above. The proposed model enables safe gentle soft-tissue handling, and it resembles a realistic human tissue. Low cost, availability, and fast construction are the most important characteristics, making this validated training model appropriate for acquiring fundamental local anesthesia, respect for hand neurovascular anatomy, and suturing skills.

Keywords

training model - hand-shaped model - surgical skill - education - suture training - teaching materials - hand anatomy - affordable

Publication History

Article published online:
10 December 2020

• References

• 1 Torkington J, Smith SG, Rees BI, Darzi A. The role of simulation in surgical training. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000; 82 (02) 88-94
• 2 Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Reznick RK, Dubrowski A. Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. Am J Surg 2007; 193 (01) 105-110
• 3 Denadai R, Oshiiwa M, Saad-Hossne R. Teaching elliptical excision skills to novice medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing low- and high-fidelity bench models. Indian J Dermatol 2014; 59 (02) 169-175
• 4 Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills–changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (25) 2664-2669
• 5 Taché S, Mbembati N, Marshall N, Tendick F, Mkony C, O’Sullivan P. Addressing gaps in surgical skills training by means of low-cost simulation at Muhimbili University in Tanzania. Hum Resour Health 2009; 7: 64
• 6 Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Development and validation of a comprehensive curriculum to teach an advanced minimally invasive procedure: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (01) 25-32
• 7 Davies J, Khatib M, Bello F. Open surgical simulation–a review. J Surg Educ 2013; 70 (05) 618-627
• 8 Dawe SR, Pena GN, Windsor JA. et al. Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training. Br J Surg 2014; 101 (09) 1063-1076
• 9 Maran NJ, Glavin RJ. Low- to high-fidelity simulation - a continuum of medical education?. Med Educ 2003; 37 (Suppl. 01) 22-28
• 10 Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC. Clinical skills training–practice makes perfect. Med Educ 2002; 36 (03) 210-211
• 11 Ericsson KA, Harwell KW. Deliberate practice and proposed limits on the effects of practice on the acquisition of expert performance: why the original definition matters and recommendations for future research. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 2396
• 12 Maguire P, Fairbairn S, Fletcher C. Consultation skills of young doctors: I–Benefits of feedback training in interviewing as students persist. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986; 292 (6535) 1573-1576
• 13 Liddell MJ, Davidson SK, Taub H, Whitecross LE. Evaluation of procedural skills training in an undergraduate curriculum. Med Educ 2002; 36 (11) 1035-1041
• 14 Cook DA, Andersen DK, Combes JR, Feldman DL, Sachdeva AK. The value proposition of simulation-based education. Surgery 2018; 163 (04) 944-949
• 15 Khunger N, Kathuria S. Mastering surgical skills through simulation-based learning: practice makes one perfect. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2016; 9 (01) 27-31
• 16 Sanfey H, Dunnington G. Verification of proficiency: a prerequisite for clinical experience. Surg Clin North Am 2010; 90 (03) 559-567
• 17 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (02) 374-381
• 18 Salas E, Burke CS. Simulation for training is effective when. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11 (02) 119-120
• 19 Nazari T, Simons MP, Zeb MH. et al. Validity of a low-cost Lichtenstein open inguinal hernia repair simulation model for surgical training. Hernia 2020; 24 (04) 895-901