Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721069
Medical Student Ophthalmic Knowledge Proficiency after Completing a Clinical Elective or an Online Course
Abstract
Background As more information is being packed into medical school curricula, mainstream medical topics legitimately receive more attention than specialty topics such as ophthalmology. However, general practitioners, as gatekeepers of specialty care, must attain competency in ophthalmology. We have investigated whether an online ophthalmology course alone would be noninferior to the same online course plus an in-person clinical elective in providing ophthalmic knowledge.
Methods Students at the University of Michigan Medical School voluntarily enrolled in one of two groups: an Online Only group requiring satisfactory completion of an online course entitled “The Eyes Have It” (TEHI) or a Clinical + Online group requiring students to complete a 2-week clinical rotation and the TEHI online course. The outcome metric was the score on an independent 50-question written examination of ophthalmic knowledge. Students also completed a survey assessing confidence in managing ophthalmic problems.
Results Twenty students in the Clinical + Online group and 59 students in the Online Only group completed the study. The Clinical + Online group slightly outscored the Online Only group (86.3 vs. 83.0%, p = 0.004). When the two outlier questions were removed from the analysis, there was no difference in mean scores between the two groups (85.8 vs. 85.4, p = 0.069). Students in the Clinical + Online group devoted 80 more hours to the experience than did the students in the Online Only group. The number of hours devoted to the course and interest in ophthalmology were weakly correlated with examination performance. After completion of the experiment, there was no difference in student-reported comfort in dealing with ophthalmic problems between the two groups.
Conclusion The examination scores of the students who completed the in-person alone were only slightly inferior to those of the students who completed the in-person clinical elective and the online course. These results suggest that an online course alone may provide a satisfactory ophthalmic knowledge base in a more compact timeframe, an alternative that should have appeal to students who do not intend to pursue a career in ophthalmology.
Publication History
Received: 26 July 2020
Accepted: 14 September 2020
Article published online:
18 December 2020
© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Velthuis F, Varpio L, Helmich E, Dekker H, Jaarsma ADC. Navigating the complexities of undergraduate medical curriculum change: change leaders' perspectives. Acad Med 2018; 93 (10) 1503-1510
- 2 Stern GA. The Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology Education Committee. Teaching ophthalmology to primary care physicians. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113 (06) 722-724
- 3 Adar T, Levkovich I, Castel OC, Karkabi K. Patient's utilization of primary care: a profile of clinical and administrative reasons for visits in Israel. J Prim Care Community Health 2017; 8 (04) 221-227
- 4 Shah M, Knoch D, Waxman E. The state of ophthalmology medical student education in the United States and Canada, 2012 through 2013. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (06) 1160-1163
- 5 Liesegang TJ, Hoskins Jr. HD, Albert DM. et al. Ophthalmic education: where have we come from, and where are we going?. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136 (01) 114-121
- 6 Petrarca CA, Warner J, Simpson A. et al. Evaluation of eLearning for the teaching of undergraduate ophthalmology at medical school: a randomised controlled crossover study. Eye (Lond) 2018; 32 (09) 1498-1503
- 7 Tang F, Chen C, Zhu Y. et al. Comparison between flipped classroom and lecture-based classroom in ophthalmology clerkship. Med Educ Online 2017; 22 (01) 1395679
- 8 Lin Y, Zhu Y, Chen C. et al. Facing the challenges in ophthalmology clerkship teaching: Is flipped classroom the answer?. PLoS One 2017; 12 (04) e0174829
- 9 Diel RJ, Avdic A, Kemp PS. Flipped ophthalmology classroom: a better way to teach medical students. J Acad Ophthalmol 2020; 12: e104-e109
- 10 Trobe JD. The Eyes Have It. Available at: http://kellogg.umich.edu/theeyeshaveit . Accessed September 28, 2020
- 11 Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995; 310 (6973): 170
- 12 American Academy of Ophthalmology EyeWiki. Welcome to EyeWiki, the Eye Encyclopedia written by Eye Physicians & Surgeons. Available at: eyewiki.aao.org . Accessed September 28, 2020
- 13 Allen RC, Harper RA. Basic Ophthalmology: Essentials for Medical Students. 10th ed.. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2016
- 14 Root T. OphthoBook. 2nd ed.. Middletown, IN: CreateSpace Independent Publishing; 2018
- 15 American Association for Family Practitioners Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Available at: https://www.aafp.org/patient-care/browse/type.tag-clinical-practice-guidelines.html . Accessed September 28, 2020
- 16 UpToDate. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/home . Accessed September 28, 2020