PDF herunterladen
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2021; 34(02): 115-123
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719063
Original Research

Kinematics of the Feline Antebrachiocarpal Joint from Supination to Pronation

Rachel M. Basa 
1   Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
,
William C.H. Parr 
2   Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
,
Christopher J. Tan
1   Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
,
William R. Walsh
2   Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
,
Kenneth A. Johnson 
1   Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
› Institutsangaben Funding R.B. was funded by a residency stipend from the Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science. The use of image processing software was subsidized by the Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Prince of Wales Clinical School.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective Cats rely on their forelimb mobility for everyday activities including climbing and grooming. Supination and pronation of the forelimb in cats are considered to primarily involve the antebrachium, rather than the carpus. Therefore, our null hypothesis was that there would be no movement of the carpal bones (radial carpal bone, ulnar carpal bone and accessory carpal bone) relative to the ulna during supination and pronation.

Study Design Eight feline cadaveric forelimbs were rotated from supination to pronation in a jig and computed tomography was performed in the neutral, supinated and pronated positions. The individual carpal bones were segmented from computed tomography images of the supinated and pronated scans in each of the eight specimens. A feline ulna coordinate system was established and used to quantify the translations and rotations between bones of the proximal carpal row and antebrachium.

Results After the carpus was rotated from the initial supinated position into pronation, there was significant translation (x, y and z axes) and rotation (x and y axes) of the proximal row of carpal bones based on absolute magnitude values. Given the differences in translations and rotations of the proximal row of carpal bones, our null hypothesis was rejected.

Conclusion The proximal row of carpal bones translate and rotate independently from the ulna in the cat during pronation of the antebrachium. This may have future implications in the diagnosis and management of feline carpal injuries involving the antebrachiocarpal joint.

Keywords

kinematics - feline - antebrachiocarpal joint - carpus - pronation/supination

Note

This research was presented at the 27th European College of Veterinary Surgeons annual scientific meeting on July 6, 2018 in Athens, Greece.


Authors' Contributions

All authors contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation, and drafting/revising and approving the submitted manuscript. They are publically accountable for relevant content.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. Januar 2019

Angenommen: 11. August 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. November 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Yalden DW. The functional morphology of the carpal bones in carnivores. Acta Anat (Basel) 1970; 77 (04) 481-500
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Neville-Towle JD, Tan CJ, Parr WCH, Walsh WR, Johnson KA. Three-dimensional kinematics of the canine carpal bones imaged with computed tomography after ex vivo axial limb loading and palmar ligament transection. Vet Surg 2018; 47 (06) 861-871
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Caliebe F, Häubetaler J, Hoffmann P, Illert M, Schirrmacher J, Wiedemann E. Cat distal forelimb joints and locomotion: an X-ray study. Eur J Neurosci 1991; 3 (01) 18-31
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Calvo I, Farrell M, Chase D, Aisa J, Rayward R, Carmichael S. Carpal arthrodesis in cats. Long-term functional outcome. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (06) 498-504
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Roos H, Brugger S, Rauscher T. [The biological valence of the motion in the radioulnar joints of the cat and dog]. Anat Histol Embryol 1992; 21 (03) 199-205
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Basa RM, Johnson KA. Management of feline carpal injuries: what are the options and when is arthrodesis indicated?. J Feline Med Surg 2019; 21 (09) 809-823
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Moojen TM, Snel JG, Ritt MJPF, Kauer JMG, Venema HW, Bos KE. Three-dimensional carpal kinematics in vivo. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17 (07) 506-514
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Smith RN. Fusion of ossification centres in the cat. J Small Anim Pract 1969; 10 (09) 523-530
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Tan CJ, Parr WCH, Walsh WR, Makara M, Johnson KA. Influence of scan resolution, thresholding, and reconstruction algorithm on computed tomography based kinematic measurements. J Biomech Eng 2017; 139 (10) 1-5
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Coburn JC, Upal MA, Crisco JJ. Coordinate systems for the carpal bones of the wrist. J Biomech 2007; 40 (01) 203-209
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Besl PJ, McKay ND. Method for registration of 3-D shapes. Proc. SPIE 1611, Sensor Fusion IV: Control Paradigms and Data Structures. 1992: 586-606
  • 12 Parr WCH, Chatterjee HJ, Soligo C. Calculating the axes of rotation for the subtalar and talocrural joints using 3D bone reconstructions. J Biomech 2012; 45 (06) 1103-1107
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Spoor CW, Veldpaus FE. Rigid body motion calculated from spatial co-ordinates of markers. J Biomech 1980; 13 (04) 391-393
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Panjabi MM. Centers and angles of rotation of body joints: a study of errors and optimization. J Biomech 1979; 12 (12) 911-920
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Miller S, Van Der Meché FGA. Movements of the forelimbs of the cat during stepping on a treadmill. Brain Res 1975; 91 (02) 255-269
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Mikić ZD, Ercegan G, Somer T, Somer T. Detailed anatomy of the antebrachiocarpal joint in dogs. Anat Rec 1992; 233 (02) 329-334
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Guilliard MJ. Dorsal radiocarpal ligament sprain causing intermittent carpal lameness in high activity dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1997; 38 (10) 463-465
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Simpson D, Goldsmid S. Pancarpal arthrodesis in a cat: a case report and an anatomical study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7 (01) 45-50
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lundgren P, Nester C, Liu A. et al. Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking. Gait Posture 2008; 28 (01) 93-100
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Pitcher GDC. Luxation of the radial carpal bone in a cat. J Small Anim Pract 1996; 37 (06) 292-295
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Bitton E, Joseph R, Portman L. et al. The effect of extension and loading of the carpus on radial rotation. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (08) 909-917
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Voss K, Geyer H, Montavon PM. Antebrachiocarpal luxation in a cat: A case report and anatomical study of the medial collateral ligament. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16 (04) 266-270
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar