Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2020; 12(02): e244-e250
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717061
Research Article

A Novel Microsurgical Suturing Pilot Course for Ophthalmology Residents Based on Kern's Model for Curriculum Development

Aliya C. Roginiel
1   Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
2   Department of Ophthalmology, Northwell Health Eye Institute, Great Neck, New York
,
Christopher C. Teng
3   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
,
Jessica H. Chow 
3   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
› Author Affiliations Funding This project was supported by funding from the Yale School of Medicine Office of Student Research.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Sutureless ophthalmic procedures are becoming more commonplace, reducing opportunities for ophthalmology residents to learn microsurgical suturing techniques. There is no standard curriculum in place to address this gap in clinical training among ophthalmology residency programs.

Objective The aim of this study was to design, implement, and evaluate a preliminary microsurgical suturing curriculum for ophthalmology residents using Kern's six-step approach for curriculum development as a guideline, and the principles of distributed practice and guided, self-directed practice.

Methods We designed a faculty-led teaching session on fundamental microsurgical suturing techniques for all 15 ophthalmology residents from Yale University over one academic year. Suturing skills were evaluated, followed by a guided teaching session, 30 days of self-directed practice time, and a re-evaluation of skills. The residents were evaluated through a written knowledge assessment and practical skills assessment. The residents also evaluated their skill level before and after the teaching session and practice period through written Likert-scale surveys. Data were evaluated in Excel using descriptive statistics and the paired t-test.

Results After the session, postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) residents felt more confident in recognition and use of surgical instruments (p < 0.01). PGY-3 residents felt less confident in their knowledge of microsurgical suturing after the session (p = 0.02). PGY-4 residents felt they were better able to identify different suture types after the session (p = 0.02). All residents improved on the written knowledge assessment (p < 0.001) and in all categories of the practical skills assessment (p < 0.001).

Conclusions Implementation of a faculty-led microsurgical suturing training session, followed by 1-month of practice time, significantly improved residents' knowledge and practical application of various microsurgical suturing techniques that are necessary for performing common ophthalmic procedures.

Keywords

microsurgical suturing - microsurgical training - surgical skills assessment - resident training - Kern's model - distributed practice

Note

This study was presented with preliminary data as a poster at the 2018 Yale Medical Education Day.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 08 November 2019

Accepted: 11 August 2020

Article published online:
04 November 2020

© .

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 

  • References

  • 1 Macsai M. Ophthalmic Microsurgical Suturing Techniques. Berlin: Springer; 2007
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ezra DG, Aggarwal R, Michaelides M. et al. Skills acquisition and assessment after a microsurgical skills course for ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology 2009; 116 (02) 257-262
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Sandford-Smith J. Sutureless cataract surgery: principles and steps. Community Eye Health 2003; 16 (48) 49-53
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Velazquez AJ, Carnahan MA, Kristinsson J, Stinnett S, Grinstaff MW, Kim T. New dendritic adhesives for sutureless ophthalmic surgical procedures: in vitro studies of corneal laceration repair. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122 (06) 867-870
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Selber JC, Chang EI, Liu J. et al. Tracking the learning curve in microsurgical skill acquisition. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (04) 550e-557e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Ophthalmology. 2017: 1-34 . Available at: https://www.acgme.org/Specialties/Documentsand-Resources/pfcatid/13/Ophthalmology
    PubMed
  • 7 Kern DE. Introduction. In: Patricia A, Thomas DEK, Mark THughes, Belinda Y.Chen. , eds. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach Third ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Kern DE. Overview: A six-step approach to curriculum development. In: Patricia A, Thomas DEK, Mark THughes, Belinda Y.Chen. , eds. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (02) 374-381
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Cremers SL, Lora AN, Ferrufino-Ponce ZK. Global Rating Assessment of Skills in Intraocular Surgery (GRASIS). Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (10) 1655-1660
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Jowett N, LeBlanc V, Xeroulis G, MacRae H, Dubrowski A. Surgical skill acquisition with self-directed practice using computer-based video training. Am J Surg 2007; 193 (02) 237-242
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Benjamin AS, Tullis J. What makes distributed practice effective?. Cognit Psychol 2010; 61 (03) 228-247
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect? a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244 (03) 400-409
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Bucholz EM, Sue GR, Yeo H, Roman SA, Bell Jr RH, Sosa JA. Our trainees' confidence: results from a national survey of 4136 US general surgery residents. Arch Surg 2011; 146 (08) 907-914
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 77 (06) 1121-1134
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22 (03) 276-282
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar