Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2021; 15(01): 109-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715989
Original Article

Assessing Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of New Approaches to Planning and Integrated Implementation of Full-Mouth Reconstruction

Fatima Dzalaeva
1   Department of Prosthodontics, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
,
Sergey Chikunov
1   Department of Prosthodontics, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
2   Department of Prosthodontics, Peoples Friendship University (RUDN), Moscow, Russian Federation
,
Anatoly Utyuzh
1   Department of Prosthodontics, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
,
Maria Mikhailova
1   Department of Prosthodontics, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
,
Marzhanat Budunova
1   Department of Prosthodontics, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Planning, adequate preparation, and further prosthodontic management are the most important steps in the treatment of this population of patients with dental and mandibular anomalies. The purpose of the article is the improvement of safety and clinical effectiveness of prosthodontic rehabilitation of patients after full-mouth reconstruction.

Materials and Methods A single-center open prospective nonrandomized study, examination, and treatment of 198 patients with partial or total absence of teeth were performed. Higher safety and clinical effectiveness of the treatment were found in the patients of the main group who showed a significant reduction in the rate of complications relative to the comparison group. In the main group, the number of aesthetic defects and cases of repeated prosthetics decreased in comparison with the corresponding occurrence rate of such cases in patient groups.

Results It showed statistically significantly reduction in the rates of occurrence of the complications when using the proposed algorithm: the rate of inflammation of the marginal periodontium and peri-implant tissues in the main group was 2.9 times less frequent and loosening of the supporting implants was 3.9 times less frequent. The rate of polymer chipping or abrasion in the area of the incisal edge or masticatory surface was two times lower in the main group of patients, short crowns were found 1.9 times less often, sores in the area of the dental pontic in the main group were 1.8 times less frequent than in the comparison group, and no fractures of bridgework were found in the main group. The frequency of neuralgic facial pain in the patients of the main group was 5.2 times less than in the comparison group, complaints about pain in the temporomandibular joint area were 8.4 times less frequent, increased abrasion of antagonist teeth was 3.9 times less frequent, and phonetics disorders were 8.4 times less frequent.

The effectiveness of the algorithm developed by us is also confirmed by the fact that the number of aesthetic defects and cases of the need for repeated prosthetic treatment was reduced in comparison with the corresponding frequency of such cases in groups of patients where standard approaches to prosthetics were applied. In particular, aesthetic defects found in the main group of patients were 2.5 times less frequent than in the comparison group, and repeated prosthetics was performed 2.7 times less frequently.

Conclusion Application of the developed comprehensive approach to planning of prosthodontic rehabilitation provides for significant reduction in the frequency of complications and aesthetic defects, as well as cases of repeated need for prosthetics.

Keywords

aesthetic defects - clinical effectiveness - complications - patient satisfaction - prosthodontic treatment


Publication History

Article published online:
08 September 2020

© 2020. European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Wolford LM. Comprehensive post orthognathic surgery orthodontics: complications, misconceptions, and management. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2020; 32 (01) 135-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Romanos GE, Javed F. Platform switching minimises crestal bone loss around dental implants: truth or myth?. J Oral Rehabil 2014; 41 (09) 700-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ali DA. Patient satisfaction in dental healthcare centers. Eur J Dent 2016; 10 (03) 309-314
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schminke B, Vom Orde F, Gruber R, Schliephake H, Bürgers R, Miosge N. The pathology of bone tissue during peri-implantitis. J Dent Res 2015; 94 (02) 354-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ketoff S, Sigaux N, Raberin M, Bouletreau P. [Dental complications during orthodontic preparation and orthognathic surgery]. Orthod Fr 2018; 89 (02) 137-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Van Gorp G, Bormans N, Vanham I, Willems G, Declerck D. Orthodontic treatment recommendation and expected adverse reactions in patients with a history of dental trauma: a survey among general dentists, paediatric dentists, and orthodontic specialists. Int J Paediatr Dent 2020; 30 (03) 360-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wang CW, Yu SH, Mandelaris GA, Wang HL. Is periodontal phenotype modification therapy beneficial for patients receiving orthodontic treatment? An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol 2020; 91 (03) 299-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rossi-Fedele G, Franciscatto GJ, Marshall G, Gomes MS, Dogramac EJ. Endodontic complications associated with orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review of human studies. Aust Endod J 2020; 46 (01) 115-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Saakian ShKh, Kalamkarov AE. The analysis of changes in bone at orthopedic treatment of patients with defects of tooth alignments with use the dental implants. Rus J Dentist 2014; 2: 13-16
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Fonseca EPD. Multivariate method to identify inequalities in oral healthcare access. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (04) 475-479
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 van Velzen FJ, Ofec R, Schulten EA, Ten Bruggenkate CM. 10-year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: A prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26 (10) 1121-1128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Park JH, Park JJ, Papademetriou M, Suri S. Anterior open bite due to idiopathic condylar resorption during orthodontic retention of a Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019; 156 (04) 555-565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gallone M, Robiony M, Bordonali D, Bruno G, De Stefani A, Gracco A. Multidisciplinary treatment with a customized lingual appliance for an adult patient with severe Class III malocclusion and multiple missing teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019; 156 (03) 401-411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gao JY, Yu XQ. Efficacy of orthodontic and orthognathic treatment for oral and maxillofacial deformities. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (39) e17324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yumashev AV, Utyuzh AS, Volchkova IR, Mikhailova MV, Kristal EA. The influence of mesodiencephalic modulation on the course of postoperative period and osseointegration quality in case of intraosseus dental implantation. Ind J Sci Tech 2016; 9: 1-8
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Chiu G, Chang C, Roberts WE. Interdisciplinary treatment for a compensated Class II partially edentulous malocclusion: orthodontic creation of a posterior implant site. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153 (03) 422-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Oz AZ, Ciger S. Health of periodontal tissues and resorption status after orthodontic treatment of impacted maxillary canines. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21 (03) 301-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ahn JC, Lee JH, Yoon JH, Lee JY, Kim JH. Interdisciplinary treatment of a patient with multiple missing teeth and periodontitis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153 (02) 278-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lam R, Goonewardene MS, Allan BP, Sugawara J. Success rates of a skeletal anchorage system in orthodontics: a retrospective analysis. Angle Orthod 2018; 88 (01) 27-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ravaghi V, Al-Hammadi Z, Landes D, Hill K, Morris AJ. Inequalities in orthodontic outcomes in England: treatment utilisation, subjective and normative need. Community Dent Health 2019; 36 (03) 198-202
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Dalago HR, Schuldt Filho G, Rodrigues MA, Renvert S, Bianchini MA. Risk indicators for Peri-implantitis: a cross-sectional study with 916 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28 (02) 144-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mombelli A, Müller N, Cionca N. The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (06) (Suppl. 06) 67-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Belibasakis GN, Charalampakis G, Bostanci N, Stadlinger B. Peri-implant infections of oral biofilm etiology. Adv Exp Med Biol 2015; 830: 69-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Choi YY. Relationship between orthodontic treatment and dental caries: results from a national survey. Int Dent J 2020; 70 (01) 38-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Fedotova EA. Retrospective assessment of prosthetic care results with complete loss of teeth. Abstract of the thesis of Candidate of Medical Sciences, St. Petersburg
  • 26 Gurdan Z, Szalma J. Evaluation of the success and complication rates of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21 (05) 546-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rakhshan H, Rakhshan V. Pain and discomfort perceived during the initial stage of active fixed orthodontic treatment. Saudi Dent J 2015; 27 (02) 81-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nishi SE, Basri R, Alam MK. Uses of electromyography in dentistry: an overview with meta-analysis. Eur J Dent 2016; 10 (03) 419-425
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar