Accuracy of the Preferred Language Field in the Electronic Health Records of Two Canadian Hospitals

Akshay Rajaram; Daniel Thomas; Faten Sallam; Amol A. Verma; Shail Rawal

doi:10.1055/s-0040-1715896

Applied Clinical Informatics, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11(04): 644-649
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715896

Case Report

Accuracy of the Preferred Language Field in the Electronic Health Records of Two Canadian Hospitals

Akshay Rajaram

¹Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

,

Daniel Thomas

²School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

,

Faten Sallam

³Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

,

Amol A. Verma

⁴Li Ka Shing Centre for Healthcare Analytics Research and Training and Division of General Internal Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

⁵Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

,

Shail Rawal

⁵Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

⁶Division of General Internal Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Background The collection of race, ethnicity, and language (REaL) data from patients is advocated as a first step to identify, monitor, and improve health inequities. As a result, many health care institutions collect patients' preferred languages in their electronic health records (EHRs). These data may be used in clinical care, research, and quality improvement. However, the accuracy of EHR language data are rarely assessed.

Objectives This study aimed to audit the accuracy of EHR language data at two academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Methods The EHR language was compared with a patient's stated preferred language by interview. Language was dichotomized to English or non-English. Agreement between language documented in the EHR and patient-reported preferred language was calculated using sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV).

Results A total of 323 patients were interviewed, including 96 with a stated non-English preferred language. The sensitivity of the EHR for English-language preference was high at both hospitals: 100% at hospital A with a PPV of 88%, and 99% at hospital B with a PPV of 85%. However, the sensitivity of the EHR for non-English preference differed greatly between the two hospitals. The sensitivity was 81% with a PPV of 100% at hospital A and the sensitivity was 12% with a PPV of 60% at hospital B.

Conclusion The accuracy of the EHR for identifying non-English language preference differed greatly between the hospitals studied. Language data must be accurate for it to be used, and regular quality assurance is required.

Keywords

electronic health record - limited English proficiency - language barriers - equity - sociodemographic data

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Scott M, Rawal S. The promise of equity: a review of health equity research in high-impact quality improvement journals. Am J Med Qual 2018; 33 (03) 269-273
2 Wyatt R, Laderman M, Botwinick L, Mate K, Whittington J. Achieving Health Equity: A Guide for Health Care Organization. . Accessed August 7, 2020 at: https://www.esrdnetwork.org/sites/default/files/IHIAchievingHealthEquityWhitePaper.pdf
3 Chin MH. Using patient race, ethnicity, and language data to achieve health equity. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (06) 703-705
4 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Inventory of Resources for Standardized Demographic and Language Data Collection. Accessed January 1, 2020 at: https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/OMH/Downloads/Data-Collection-Resources.pdf
5 John-Baptiste A, Naglie G, Tomlinson G. , et al. The effect of English language proficiency on length of stay and in-hospital mortality. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19 (03) 221-228
6 Divi C, Koss RG, Schmaltz SP, Loeb JM. Language proficiency and adverse events in US hospitals: a pilot study. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19 (02) 60-67
7 Karliner LS, Kim SE, Meltzer DO, Auerbach AD. Influence of language barriers on outcomes of hospital care for general medicine inpatients. J Hosp Med 2010; 5 (05) 276-282
8 Rawal S, Srighanthan J, Vasantharoopan A, Hu H, Tomlinson G, Cheung AM. Association Between Limited English Proficiency and Revisits and Readmissions After Hospitalization for Patients With Acute and Chronic Conditions in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. JAMA 2019; 322 (16) 1605-1607
9 Wray R, Agic B, Bennett-AbuAyyash C. , et al. We ask because we care The Tri-Hospital + TPH Health Equity Data Collection Research Project Report. Accessed December, 2017 at: www.stmichaelshospital.com/quality/equity-data-collection-report.pdf
10 American Hospital Association. Reducing Health Care Disparities: Collection and Use of Race, Ethnicity and Language Data.. Accessed January 1, 2020 at: http://www.hpoe.org/resources/ahahret-guides/1431
11 McClure LA, Glaser SL, Shema SJ. , et al. Availability and accuracy of medical record information on language usage of cancer patients from a multi-ethnic population. J Immigr Minor Health 2010; 12 (04) 480-488
12 Azar KM, Moreno MR, Wong EC, Shin JJ, Soto C, Palaniappan LP. Accuracy of data entry of patient race/ethnicity/ancestry and preferred spoken language in an ambulatory care setting. Health Serv Res 2012; 47 (1 Pt 1): 228-240
13 Klinger EV, Carlini SV, Gonzalez I. , et al. Accuracy of race, ethnicity, and language preference in an electronic health record. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (06) 719-723
14 2016 Census: Families, households and marital status; Language. Accessed June 10, 2019 at: https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/96e4-2016-Census-Backgrounder-Family-Households-Languages.pdf
15 Bierman AS, Lurie N, Collins KS, Eisenberg JM. Addressing racial and ethnic barriers to effective health care: the need for better data. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002; 21 (03) 91-102
16 Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 1998; 17 (08) 857-872
17 Institute of Medicine (US) Subcommittee on Standardized Collection of Race/Ethnicity Data for Healthcare Quality Improvement;. In: Ulmer C, McFadden B, Nerenz DR. , eds. Race, Ethnicity, and Language Data: Standardizationfor Health Care Quality Improvement. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009
18 Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Improving Health Equity: Guidance for Health Care Organizations. Accessed August 7, 2020 at: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Publications/Improving-Health-Equity-Guidance-for-Health-Care-Organizations.aspx
19 Lee WC, Veeranki SP, Serag H, Eschbach K, Smith KD. Improving the collection of race, ethnicity, and language data to reduce healthcare disparities: a case study from an academic medical center. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2016; 13 (Fall): 1g
20 Wu RR, Myers RA, Buchanan AH. , et al. Effect of sociodemographic factors on update of a patient-facing information technology family health history risk assessment platform. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (02) 180-188
21 Marcano Belisario JS, Jamsek J, Huckvale K, O'Donoghue J, Morrison CP, Car J. Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (07) MR000042
22 Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res 2007; 42 (02) 727-754