Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2020; 12(02): e124-e133
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715808
Research Article

Factors Influencing Postgraduate Career Decisions of Ophthalmology Residents

Xinyi Chen
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Sidra Zafar
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Divya Srikumaran
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Michael V. Boland
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Thomas V. Johnson
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Laura K. Green
2   Department of Ophthalmology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore and Northwest Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Saras Ramanathan
3   Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California
,
Jeff Pettey
4   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Steven J. Gedde
5   Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
,
Fasika A. Woreta
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aims to identify factors that influence ophthalmology residents' decision to pursue fellowship training or to practice comprehensive ophthalmology after residency.

Design This is a cross-sectional study.

Methods An anonymous survey was sent to ophthalmology residents in the United States from the graduating class of 2018. The main outcome measure was the decision to seek fellowship training or to practice comprehensive ophthalmology. Information on demographics, residency program characteristics, and factors influencing career choices were collected.

Results The overall response rate was 24.0% (112/467). Among the 112 respondents, 88 (78.6%) matched into subspecialty training. Compared with residents entering comprehensive ophthalmology, there was a greater proportion of Asians (37.5 vs. 8.3%) and a smaller proportion of non-Hispanic whites (47.7 vs. 70.8%, p = 0.029) among residents pursuing fellowship training. Residents pursuing fellowships had fewer children (0.4 vs. 0.8, p = 0.049), had less debt (median debt ≤ $100,000 vs. > $200,000, p = 0.008), had more first-author publications (4.3 vs. 1.2, p< 0.001), decided on their postgraduate career path earlier (median time postgraduate second year [PGY2] versus postgraduate third year [PGY3], p = 0.016), and were more likely to plan to practice in an academic setting (51.1 vs. 29.2%, p< 0.001) and in an urban location (44.3 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.004). In a multiple logistic regression model, factors predictive of fellowship training included a desire to acquire special skills (odds ratio [OR] =4.39; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.70–16.37) and work with new technology (OR = 2.92; 95% CI: 1.16–10.02). Factors that predicted a career in comprehensive ophthalmology were higher levels of educational debt (OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.12–0.77), a later timing of postgraduate decision (OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.02–0.65), and lifestyle considerations (OR = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.03–0.36). Gender, prestige, or perceived favorable job market was not significant factors.

Conclusion The majority of U.S. ophthalmology residents matched into fellowships. A desire to gain special skills and a desire to work with new technology were major factors influencing residents to seek fellowship training. Lifestyle considerations and educational debt were more important in the decision to choose a comprehensive ophthalmology career. Future research that includes more trainees and programs may minimize the selection bias issues present in this study.

Keywords

fellowship - comprehensive ophthalmology - career


Publication History

Received: 27 March 2020

Accepted: 13 July 2020

Article published online:
31 August 2020

© .

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 

  • References

  • 1 Statistics - Ophthalmology Fellowship Match. Available at: https://sfmatch.org/PDFFilesDisplay/Ophthalmology_Fellowship_Stats_2019.pdf . Accessed July 22, 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gedde SJ, Budenz DL, Haft P, Tielsch JM, Lee Y, Quigley HA. Factors influencing career choices among graduating ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (07) 1247-1254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lee PP, Jackson CA, Relles DA. Estimating eye care workforce supply and requirements. Ophthalmology 1995; 102 (12) 1964-1971 , discussion 1971–1972
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Adelman RA, Nwanze CC. The impact of the economy and recessions on the marketplace demand for ophthalmologists (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2011; 109: 49-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pletcher BA, Rimsza ME, Cull WL, Shipman SA, Shugerman RP, O'Connor KG. Primary care pediatricians' satisfaction with subspecialty care, perceived supply, and barriers to care. J Pediatr 2010; 156 (06) 1011-1015.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Frohman LP. How can we assure that neuro-ophthalmology will survive?. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (05) 741-743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 The National Institute of Health:The National Eye Institute. Glaucoma Data and Statistics. Available at: https://www.nei.nih.gov/learn-about-eye-health/resources-for-health-educators/eye-health-data-and-statistics/glaucoma-data-and-statistics . Accessed July 22, 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Roberfroid D, Leonard C, Stordeur S. Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball?. Hum Resour Health 2009; 7: 10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 1974; 19 (06) 716-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: https://www.gbif.org/tool/81287/r-a-language-and-environment-for-statistical-computing . Accessed July 22, 2020
    PubMed
  • 11 Tan DT, Dart JK, Holland EJ, Kinoshita S. Corneal transplantation. Lancet 2012; 379 (9827): 1749-1761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Manche E, Roe J. Recent advances in wavefront-guided LASIK. CurrOpin Ophthalmol 2018; 29 (04) 286-291
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Aref AA, Gedde SJ, Budenz DL. Glaucoma drainage implant surgery. Dev Ophthalmol 2017; 59: 43-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mok PS, Probyn L, Finlay K. Factors influencing radiology residents' fellowship training and practice preferences in canada. Can AssocRadiol J 2016; 67 (02) 99-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Matson AP, Kavolus JJ, Byrd WA, Leversedge FJ, Brigman BE. Influence of trainee experience on choice of orthopaedic subspecialty fellowship. J Am Acad OrthopSurg 2018; 26 (03) e62-e67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fang YMV, Egan JFX, Rombro T, Morris B, Zelop CM. A comparison of reasons for choosing obstetrician/gynecologist subspecialty training. Conn Med 2009; 73 (03) 165-170
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lorin S, Heffner J, Carson S. Attitudes and perceptions of internal medicine residents regarding pulmonary and critical care subspecialty training. Chest 2005; 127 (02) 630-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Butkus R, Serchen J, Moyer DV, Bornstein SS, Hingle ST. Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians. Achieving gender equity in physician compensation and career advancement: a position paper of the american college of physicians. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168 (10) 721-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 El Arnaout N, Chehab RF, Rafii B, Alameddine M. Gender equity in planning, development and management of human resources for health: a scoping review. Hum Resour Health 2019; 17 (01) 52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Westring A, McDonald JM, Carr P, Grisso JA. An integrated framework for gender equity in academic medicine. Acad Med 2016; 91 (08) 1041-1044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gong D, Winn BJ, Beal CJ. , et al. Gender differences in case volume among ophthalmology residents. JAMA Ophthalmol 2019; 137 (09) 1015-1020 (e-pub ahead of print)
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dotan G, Qureshi HM, Gaton DD. Chairs of United States Academic Ophthalmology Departments: a descriptive analysis and trends. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 196: 26-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Camacci ML, Lu A, Lehman EB, Scott IU, Bowie E, Pantanelli SM. Association between sex composition and publication productivity of journal editorial and professional society board members in ophthalmology. JAMA Ophthalmol 2020 (e-pub ahead of print). Doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kramer PW, Kohnen T, Groneberg DA, Bendels MHK. Sex disparities in ophthalmic research: a descriptive bibliometric study on scientific authorships. JAMA Ophthalmol 2019; 137 (11) 1223-1231 (e-pub ahead of print)
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Patel SH, Truong T, Tsui I, Moon JY, Rosenberg JB. Gender of presenters at ophthalmology conferences between 2015 and 2017. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 213: 120-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jolly P. Medical school tuition and young physicians' indebtedness. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005; 24 (02) 527-535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Frintner MP, Mulvey HJ, Pletcher BA, Olson LM. Pediatric resident debt and career intentions. Pediatrics 2013; 131 (02) 312-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Xierali IM, Nivet MA, Wilson MR. Current and future status of diversity in ophthalmologist workforce. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016; 134 (09) 1016-1023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar