PDF herunterladen
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82(06): 643-651
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715606
Original Article

Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review

Kent Tadokoro
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
,
Matthew Robert Bartindale 
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
,
Nadeem El-Kouri
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
,
Dennis Moore
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
,
Christopher Britt
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
,
Matthew Kircher
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective Ipsilateral cochlear implantation (CI) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) has been an emerging trend over the last two decades. We conducted the first systematic review of hearing outcomes comparing neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and sporadic VS undergoing CI. A comparison of the two populations and predictor of outcome was assessed. This is an update to a previously presented study.

Data Sources Systemic data searches were performed in PubMed NCBI and Scopus by an academic librarian. No restrictions based on the year of publication were used.

Study Selection Studies were selected if patients had a diagnosis of NF2 and a CI placed in the affected side with reports of hearing outcome. Two independent reviewers screened each abstract and full-text article.

Data Extraction Studies were extracted at the patient level, and the assessment of quality and bias was evaluated according to the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool.

Main Outcome Measures Outcome predictors were determined by using the chi-square test and Student's t-test.

Results Overall, most CI recipients functioned in the high-to-intermediate performer category for both sporadic and NF2-related VS. Median AzBio (Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test) was 72% (interquartile range [IQR]: 50) in NF2 patients and 70% (IQR: 7.25) in sporadic patients. Larger tumor size predicted a poorer final audiometric outcome.

Conclusions Categorization of hearing outcome into superior performance and inferior performance based on sentence recognition revealed a generally good hearing outcome regardless of treatment or patient population. Select patients with sporadic and NF2 VS may benefit from CI.

Keywords

vestibular schwannoma - acoustic neuroma - neurofibromatosis type 2 - cochlear implant - hearing conservation surgery - hearing rehabilitation - stereotactic radiosurgery

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 11. Januar 2020

Angenommen: 22. Mai 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Juni 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Evans DG, Huson SM, Donnai D. et al. A genetic study of type 2 neurofibromatosis in the United Kingdom. I. Prevalence, mutation rate, fitness, and confirmation of maternal transmission effect on severity. J Med Genet 1992; 29 (12) 841-846
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Evans DGR, Moran A, King A, Saeed S, Gurusinghe N, Ramsden R. Incidence of vestibular schwannoma and neurofibromatosis 2 in the North West of England over a 10-year period: higher incidence than previously thought. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26 (01) 93-97
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Martuza RL, Eldridge R. Neurofibromatosis 2 (bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis). N Engl J Med 1988; 318 (11) 684-688
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Mautner VF, Tatagiba M, Guthoff R, Samii M, Pulst SM. Neurofibromatosis 2 in the pediatric age group. Neurosurgery 1993; 33 (01) 92-96
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Soulier G, van Leeuwen BM, Putter H. et al. Quality of life in 807 patients with vestibular schwannoma: comparing treatment modalities. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 157 (01) 92-98
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Carlson ML, Habermann EB, Wagie AE. et al. The changing landscape of vestibular schwannoma management in the United States--a shift toward conservatism. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 153 (03) 440-446
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Elliott A, Hebb ALO, Walling S, Morris DP, Bance M. Hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma management. Am J Otolaryngol 2015; 36 (04) 526-534
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Daniel RT, Tuleasca C, George M. et al. Preserving normal facial nerve function and improving hearing outcome in large vestibular schwannomas with a combined approach: planned subtotal resection followed by gamma knife radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159 (07) 1197-1211
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Lloyd SKW, King AT, Rutherford SA. et al. Hearing optimisation in neurofibromatosis type 2: A systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42 (06) 1329-1337
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Edgerton BJ, House WF, Hitselberger W. Hearing by cochlear nucleus stimulation in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1982; 91 (2 Pt 3): 117-124
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Hitselberger WE, House WF, Edgerton BJ, Whitaker S. Cochlear nucleus implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984; 92 (01) 52-54
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hoffman RA, Kohan D, Cohen NL. Cochlear implants in the management of bilateral acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 1992; 13 (06) 525-528
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Neff BA, Wiet RM, Lasak JM. et al. Cochlear implantation in the neurofibromatosis type 2 patient: long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (06) 1069-1072
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Peng KA, Lorenz MB, Otto SR, Brackmann DE, Wilkinson EP. Cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation in neurofibromatosis type 2. Laryngoscope 2018; 128 (09) 2163-2169
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Bartindale MR, Tadokoro KS, Kircher ML. Cochlear implantation in sporadic vestibular schwannoma: a systematic literature review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80 (06) 632-639
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Carlson ML, Breen JT, Driscoll CL. et al. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: variables affecting auditory performance. Otol Neurotol 2012; 33 (05) 853-862
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 National Institutes of Health. Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/case_series . Accessed August 28, 2019
  • 19 Evans DG, Huson SM, Donnai D. et al. A clinical study of type 2 neurofibromatosis. Q J Med 1992; 84 (304) 603-618
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Patel CM, Ferner R, Grunfeld EA. A qualitative study of the impact of living with neurofibromatosis type 2. Psychol Health Med 2011; 16 (01) 19-28
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Neary WJ, Hillier VF, Flute T, Stephens D, Ramsden RT, Evans DGR. Use of a closed set questionnaire to measure primary and secondary effects of neurofibromatosis type 2. J Laryngol Otol 2010; 124 (07) 720-728
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Mahboubi H, Maducdoc MM, Yau AY. et al. Vestibular schwannoma excision in sporadic versus neurofibromatosis type 2 populations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 153 (05) 822-831
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Otto SR, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE, Shannon RV, Kuchta J. Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: update on performance in 61 patients. J Neurosurg 2002; 96 (06) 1063-1071
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Lenarz T, Moshrefi M, Matthies C. et al. Auditory brainstem implant: part I. Auditory performance and its evolution over time. Otol Neurotol 2001; 22 (06) 823-833
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Nevison B, Laszig R, Sollmann W-P. et al. Results from a European clinical investigation of the Nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem implant. Ear Hear 2002; 23 (03) 170-183
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Harris F, Tysome JR, Donnelly N. et al. Cochlear implants in the management of hearing loss in neurofibromatosis type 2. Cochlear Implants Int 2017; 18 (03) 171-179
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 North HJD, Mawman D, O'Driscoll M. et al. Outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. Cochlear Implants Int 2016; 17 (04) 172-177
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Lloyd SKW, Glynn FJ, Rutherford SA. et al. Ipsilateral cochlear implantation after cochlear nerve preserving vestibular schwannoma surgery in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. Otol Neurotol 2014; 35 (01) 43-51
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Reznitsky M, Cayé-Thomasen P. Systematic review of hearing preservation in observed vestibular schwannoma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80 (02) 165-168
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Martin TPC, Senthil L, Chavda SV, Walsh R, Irving RM. A protocol for the conservative management of vestibular schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30 (03) 381-385
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Mahboubi H, Sahyouni R, Moshtaghi O. et al. CyberKnife for treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 157 (01) 7-15
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Pisa J, Sulkers J, Butler JB, West M, Hochman JB. Stereotactic radiosurgery does not appear to impact cochlear implant performance in patients with neurofibromatosis type II. J Radiosurg SBRT 2017; 5 (01) 63-71
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Costello MS, Golub JS, Barrord JV, Pater L, Pensak ML, Samy RN. Cochlear implantation after radiation therapy for acoustic neuroma. J Radiosurg SBRT 2016; 4 (01) 69-74
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Adams RD. The neuropathology of radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1991; 57 (1-2): 82-86
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Wackym PA, Runge-Samuelson CL, Nash JJ. et al. Gamma knife surgery of vestibular schwannomas: volumetric dosimetry correlations to hearing loss suggest stria vascularis devascularization as the mechanism of early hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (09) 1480-1487
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Buchman CA, Chen DA, Flannagan P, Wilberger JE, Maroon JC. The learning curve for acoustic tumor surgery. Laryngoscope 1996; 106 (11) 1406-1411
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Mangham Jr CA. Retrosigmoid versus middle fossa surgery for small vestibular schwannomas. Laryngoscope 2004; 114 (08) 1455-1461
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Wilkinson EP, Roberts DS, Cassis A, Schwartz MS. Hearing outcomes after middle fossa or retrosigmoid craniotomy for vestibular schwannoma tumors. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77 (04) 333-340
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Linthicum Jr FH, Brackmann DE. Bilateral acoustic tumors. A diagnostic and surgical challenge. Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106 (12) 729-733
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Adunka OF, Gantz BJ, Dunn C, Gurgel RK, Buchman CA. Minimum reporting standards for adult cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 159 (02) 215-219
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Luxford WM. Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Minimum speech test battery for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 124 (02) 125-126
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Sladen DP, Carlson ML, Dowling BP. et al. Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss: speech recognition in quiet and in noise, and health related quality of life. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (05) 576-581
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Carlson ML, Neff BA, Link MJ. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging with cochlear implant magnet in place: safety and imaging quality. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36 (06) 965-971
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Edmonson HA, Carlson ML, Patton AC, Watson RE. MR imaging and cochlear implants with retained internal magnets: reducing artifacts near highly inhomogeneous magnetic fields. Radiographics 2018; 38 (01) 94-106
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Lassaletta L, Polak M, Huesers J. et al. Usefulness of electrical auditory brainstem responses to assess the functionality of the cochlear nerve using an intracochlear test electrode. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38 (10) e413-e420
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Cinar BC, Yarali M, Atay G, Bajin MD, Sennaroglu G, Sennaroglu L. The role of eABR with intracochlear test electrode in decision making between cochlear and brainstem implants: preliminary results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (09) 3315-3326
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Kasbekar AV, Tam YC, Carlyon RP. et al. Intraoperative monitoring of the cochlear nerve during neurofibromatosis type-2 vestibular schwannoma surgery and description of a “test intracochlear electrode”. J Neurol Surg Rep 2019; 80 (01) e1-e9
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Tan H, Jia H, Li Y. et al. Impact of cochlear implantation on the management strategy of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275 (11) 2667-2674
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Dos Santos NetoPH, Zamponi JO, Hamerschmidt R, Wiemes GRM, Rassi MS, Borba LAB. Simultaneous cochlear implantation as a therapeutic option in vestibular schwannoma surgery: case report. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 44 (03) E9
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 DeHart AN, Broaddus WC, Coelho DH. Translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma resection with simultaneous cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 2017; 18 (05) 278-284
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Carlson ML, Neff BA, Sladen DP, Link MJ, Driscoll CL. Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Intracochlear and Intralabyrinthine Schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (06) 647-653
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Pimentel PS, Ramos DS, Muniz L, Leal M de C, Caldas Neto S da S. Cochlear implant in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 2 undergoing radiotherapy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 82 (02) 242-243
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Ozdek A, Bayir O, Dönmez T. et al. Hearing restoration in NF2 patients and patients with vestibular schwannoma in the only hearing ear: report of two cases. Am J Otolaryngol 2014; 35 (04) 538-541
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Lassaletta L, Aristegui M, Medina M. et al. Ipsilateral cochlear implantation in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma in the only or best hearing ear and in patients with NF2. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (01) 27-35
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Pai I, Dhar V, Kelleher C. et al. Cochlear implantation in patients with vestibular schwannoma: a single United Kingdom center experience. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (08) 2019-2023
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Amoodi HA, Makki FM, Cavanagh J, Maessen H, Bance M. Cochlear implant rehabilitation for patients with vestibular schwannoma: report of two cases. Cochlear Implants Int 2012; 13 (02) 124-127
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Monteiro TA, Goffi-Gomez MVS, Tsuji RK, Gomes MQT, Brito Neto RV, Bento RF. Neurofibromatosis 2: hearing restoration options. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 78 (05) 128-134
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Mukherjee P, Ramsden JD, Donnelly N. et al. Cochlear implants to treat deafness caused by vestibular schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34 (07) 1291-1298
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 59 Cruz OLM, Vellutini EAS. Cochlear implant in type 2 neurofibromatosis: an option for better hearing rehabilitation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 77 (04) 538
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 60 Odat HA, Piccirillo E, Sequino G, Taibah A, Sanna M. Management strategy of vestibular schwannoma in neurofibromatosis type 2. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32 (07) 1163-1170
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 61 Roehm PC, Mallen-St ClairJ, Jethanamest D. et al. Auditory rehabilitation of patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2 by using cochlear implants. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (04) 827-834
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 62 Trotter MI, Briggs RJS. Cochlear implantation in neurofibromatosis type 2 after radiation therapy. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (02) 216-219
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 63 Tran Ba HuyP, Kania R, Frachet B, Poncet C, Legac M-S. Auditory rehabilitation with cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. Acta Otolaryngol 2009; 129 (09) 971-975
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 64 Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Guida M, Di Trapani G, Sanna M. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation. Audiol Neurootol 2008; 13 (04) 273-280
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 65 Lustig LR, Yeagle J, Driscoll CLW, Blevins N, Francis H, Niparko JK. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27 (04) 512-518
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 66 Arístegui M, Denia A. Simultaneous cochlear implantation and translabyrinthine removal of vestibular schwannoma in an only hearing ear: report of two cases (neurofibromatosis type 2 and unilateral vestibular schwannoma). Otol Neurotol 2005; 26 (02) 205-210
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 67 Nölle C, Todt I, Basta D, Unterberg A, Mautner VF, Ernst A. Cochlear implantation after acoustic tumour resection in neurofibromatosis type 2: impact of intra- and postoperative neural response telemetry monitoring. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2003; 65 (04) 230-234
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 68 Graham J, Lynch C, Weber B, Stollwerck L, Wei J, Brookes G. The magnetless Clarion cochlear implant in a patient with neurofibromatosis 2. J Laryngol Otol 1999; 113 (05) 458-463
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 69 Temple RH, Axon PR, Ramsden RT, Keles N, Deger K, Yöcel E. Auditory rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2: a case for cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 1999; 113 (02) 161-163
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 70 Tono T, Ushisako Y, Morimitsu T. Cochlear implantation in an intralabyrinthine acoustic neuroma patient after resection of an intracanalicular tumour. J Laryngol Otol 1996; 110 (06) 570-573
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar