Publication Performance in German Academic Heart Surgery

Abstract

Background This study was designed to evaluate the publication performance of management teams consisting of chief and senior physicians in German university cardiac surgery units over a 10-year period and to facilitate benchmarking.

Methods The cutoff date for consideration of staffing from the unit Web site and publications was July 1, 2017. The literature search was based on an evaluation of the PubMed database. The 5-year impact factor (IF) from 2016 was assigned to each journal.

Results Two thousand five hundred thirty-five publications (average IF 3.02) were registered, published in 323 journals. Of a total of 341 management team members, 235 (68.9%) published as first or last author over the 10-year period. The number of publications from the units divided into quintiles varied considerably with the first six units contributing 39.0% of all publications and the last nine units 9.4%. With a cumulative IF total of 3265, the publications of the first six units accounted for 42.7% of the cumulative IF, the last unit quintile amounted to 621 (8.1%) of the cumulative IF. When considering publications per managing member, the first quintile averaged 11.9 publications (29.6 IF) per managing member, the last quintile 3.3 publications (8.0 IF) per member.

Conclusions The six units of the first quintile published on average 3.6 times more per managing member than the nine units in the last quintile and the average cumulative IF per member in the first quintile was almost five times higher. Further investigation must show whether this considerable difference in publication activity between the university units is also observed in other operative fields.

Keywords

cardiac surgery - university units - publication activity - impact factor - benchmarking

Publication History

Received: 17 March 2020

Accepted: 29 May 2020

Article published online:
08 September 2020

• References

• 1 Schwarzer M, Alscher L, Doenst T. Comparison of scientific publications from three different clinical disciplines of German universities. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67 (06) 488-493
• 2 Putzer G, Ausserer J, Wenzel V. et al. Publikationsleistungen der Universitätskliniken für Anästhesiologie: Deutschland, Österreich und Schweiz von 2001-2010 [Publication performances of university clinics for anesthesiology: Germany, Austria and Switzerland from 2001 to 2010]. Anaesthesist 2014; 63 (04) 287-293
• 3 Schubert CD, Leitsch S, Haertnagl F, Haas EM, Giunta RE. Vorteil durch Eigenständigkeit? Analyse der Publikationsleistung der universitären Plastischen Chirurgie in verschiedenen Organisationsstrukturen [Independence in Plastic Surgery - Benefit or Barrier? Analysis of the Publication Performance in Academic Plastic Surgery Depending on Varying Organisational Structures]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2015; 47 (04) 213-221
• 4 Haffke F, Debus ES, Grundmann RT. Publikationsleistung der deutschen akademischen Gefäßchirurgie – Journale, Impactfaktoren und Schwerpunktthemen [The publication performance of German academic vascular surgery-journals, focal topics and impact factors]. Chirurg 2019; 90 (08) 660-667
• 5 Debus ES, Haffke F, Grundmann RT. Analyse der Publikationsleistung der deutschen universitären Gefäßchirurgie in verschiedenen Organisationsstrukturen. Gefasschirurgie 2019; 24: 239-246