Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2022; 39(01): 084-091
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714421
Original Article

Factors Associated with Occurrence of Stillbirth before 32 Weeks of Gestation in a Contemporary Cohort

Elizabeth E. Brackett
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Eric S. Hall 
2   Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
3   Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
4   Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Emily A. DeFranco
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
3   Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Robert M. Rossi
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective We sought to quantify the distribution of stillbirths by gestational age (GA) in a contemporary cohort and to determine identifiable risk factors associated with stillbirth prior to 32 weeks of gestation.

Study Design Population-based case-control study of all stillbirths in the United States during the year 2014, utilizing vital statistics data, obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics. Distribution of stillbirths were stratified by 20 to 44 weeks of GA, in women diagnosed with stillbirth in the antepartum period. Pregnancy characteristics were compared between those diagnosed with stillbirth <32 versus ≥32 weeks of gestation. Multivariate logistic regression estimated the relative influence of various factors on the outcome of stillbirth prior to 32 weeks of gestation.

Results There were 15,998 nonlaboring women diagnosed with stillbirth during 2014 in the United States between 20 and 44 weeks. Of them, 60.1% (n = 9,618) occurred before antenatal fetal surveillance (ANFS) is typically initiated (<32 weeks) and 39.9% (n = 6,380) were diagnosed at ≥32 weeks. Women with stillbirth prior to 32 weeks were more likely to be of non-Hispanic Black race (29.0 vs. 23.9%, p < 0.001), nulliparous (53.8 vs. 50.6%, p = 0.001), have chronic hypertension (CHTN; 6.0 vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001), and fetal growth restriction as evidenced by small for GA (SGA < 10th%) birth weight (44.8 vs. 42.1%, p < 0.001) as opposed to women with stillbirth after 32 weeks. After adjustment, SGA birth weight (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–1.3), Black race (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1–1.3), and CHTN (aOR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1–1.5) were associated with stillbirth prior to 32 weeks of gestation as opposed to stillbirth after 32 weeks.

Conclusion More than 6 out of 10 stillbirths in this study occurred <32 weeks of gestation, before ANFS is typically initiated under American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendations. Among identifiable risk factors, CHTN, Black race, and fetal growth restriction were associated with higher risk of stillbirth before 32 weeks of gestation. Earlier ANFS may be warranted at in certain “at risk” women.

Key Points

  • Six out of 10 stillbirths occur before 32 weeks of gestation.

  • We evaluated factors associated with stillbirth <32 weeks.

  • Hypertension and fetal growth restriction were associated with early stillbirth.

Keywords

stillbirth - intrauterine fetal demise - antenatal testing

Note

This study was presented at the SMFM Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting, February 11–16, 2019, Las Vegas, NV (Poster no.: 725). This study includes data provided by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Vital Statistics System, which should not be considered an endorsement of this study or its conclusions.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 22 December 2019

Accepted: 13 June 2020

Article published online:
31 July 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Management of stillbirth. ACOG practice bulletin no. 102. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (03) 748-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Antepartum Fetal Surveillance. ACOG practice bulletin no. 145. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 182-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pircon RA, Lagrew DC, Towers CV, Dorchester WL, Gocke SE, Freeman RK. Antepartum testing in the hypertensive patient: when to begin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164 (6 Pt 1): discussion 1569–1570 1563-1569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lagrew DC, Pircon RA, Towers CV, Dorchester W, Freeman RK. Antepartum fetal surveillance in patients with diabetes: when to start?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168 (6 Pt 1): discussion 1825–1826 1820-1825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ 2013; 346: f108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P. et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011; 377 (9774): 1331-1340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 National Center for Health Statistics. Guide to completing the facility worksheets for the certificate of live birth and report of fetal death (2003 revision). Accessed July 3, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/GuidetoCompleteFacilityWks.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Kimeyer SE, Gregory ECW. Measuring gestational age in vital statistics data: transitioning to the obstetric estimate. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015; 64 (05) 1-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87 (02) 163-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000; 894: i-xii , 1–253
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy. ACOG practice bulletin no. 203. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: e26-e50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rouse DJ, Owen J, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP. Determinants of the optimal time in gestation to initiate antenatal fetal testing: a decision-analytic approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173 (05) 1357-1363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Willinger M, Ko C-W, Reddy UM. Racial disparities in stillbirth risk across gestation in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (05) 469.e1-469.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Freeman RK, Anderson G, Dorchester W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143 (07) 771-777
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Manning FA. Dynamic ultrasound-based fetal assessment: the fetal biophysical profile score. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1995; 38 (01) 26-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Manning FA, Morrison I, Harman CR, Lange IR, Menticoglou S. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 19,221 referred high-risk pregnancies. II. An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157 (4 Pt 1): 880-884
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Berkley E, Chauhan SP, Abuhamad A. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee. Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (04) 300-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 6: CD007529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar