A Novel Application of Digital Microscope for Microsurgery Training

Abstract

Background Time spent under the microscope is often a limiting factor as plastic surgery residents work toward proficiency in microsurgery. This study describes and assesses a novel application of a digital microscope compatible with smart devices which can consistently and reliably magnify microsurgical fields.

Methods A digital microscope was used to display an “operating” field on a tablet device. Two junior plastic surgery residents participated in multiple training sessions. During each session, residents completed two sessions of a knot-tying task and a chicken vessel anastomosis task. The sessions were recorded on the tablet, photographed, and graded by an experienced microsurgeon utilizing three standardized microsurgery training scales (OWOMSA, OSATS, and Global scale) for evaluation. Between sessions, the residents received feedback from the experienced microsurgeon.

Results Statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) in microsurgical technique were observed across 16 areas assessed by the standardized evaluation scales. Additionally, the residents' surveys suggest favorable attitudes toward the digital microscope and its value as a training device.

Conclusion Traditional operating microscopes present considerable barriers for effective microsurgical training. The digital microscope analyzed in the present study provides solutions to several of these barriers: it is economical, lightweight, portable, and can be set up by the trainee on any flat surface; photographing and recording capabilities via the connected tablet device make the digital microscope setup optimized for education. Our study demonstrates measurable improvements in trainee's skills with use of—as well as favorable trainee attitudes toward—the digital microscope, which could present a valuable addition to plastic surgery education.

Keywords

microsurgery - digital - education

Note

All the principles outlined in the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000, have been followed in all the experiments involving human subjects during the current study.

• References

• 1 Millard DR. Principlization of Plastic Surgery. 1st ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 1986
• 2 Tamai S. History of microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (06) e282-e294
• 3 Karakawa R, Yoshimatsu H, Yano T, Sawaizumi M. Microsurgery training using Apple iPad Pro. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (08) 926-927
• 4 Capkin S, Cavit A, Kaleli T. Microsurgery training with smartphone. Handchirurgie, mikrochirurgie, plastische chirurgie: organ der deutschsprachigen arbeitsgemeinschaft fur handchirurgie. Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse 2018; 50 (06) 443-445
• 5 Microsurgery essentials: suturing [video online]. Available at: https://plasticsurgery.stanford.edu/education/microsurgery/suturing.html . Accessed April 2, 2020
• 6 Blue “blood” gives residents innovative microsurgery training. https://www.surgery.wisc.edu/2018/12/13/blue-blood-gives-residents-innovative-microsurgery-training/ . Accessed April 2, 2020
• 7 Temple CL, Ross DC. A new, validated instrument to evaluate competency in microsurgery: the University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Acquisition/Assessment instrument [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 215-222
• 8 Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R. , et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 1997; 84 (02) 273-278
• 9 Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick RK, Szalay D. Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med 1998; 73 (09) 993-997
• 10 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. , et al. Validation of novel and objective measures of microsurgical skill: hand-motion analysis and stereoscopic visual acuity. Microsurgery 2003; 23 (04) 317-322
• 11 Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W. Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 1997; 173 (03) 226-230