CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2020; 7(01): S3
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709573
Abstracts

Anesthetic Considerations for Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Predicting Early Position Related Neurological Insult during Cervical Myelopathy Surgery: An Institutional Review of 56 Consecutive Cases

Senthil Kumar
1   Institute of Anaesthesia, SIMS Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Vijay S.
2   Institute of Neurosurgery, SIMS Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Vishwaraj R.
2   Institute of Neurosurgery, SIMS Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Nishanth S.
3   Division of Neurophysiology, SIMS Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
K.R. Suresh B.
2   Institute of Neurosurgery, SIMS Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations

Background: The risk of neurological injury is inherent during surgical positioning for patients with unstable surgical spine and patients with severe myelopathic changes. The role of Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) and anesthetic drug optimization in these scenarios are not well defined. This review is aimed to study the impact of choice and dosing of anesthetic drugs for obtaining consistent multimodal IONM signals and predicting early neurological deficits during surgical positioning of patients with cervical spine disorders.

Materials and Methods: Data from 56 adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgeries for spondylotic or traumatic myelopathy under IONM were reviewed (January 2017–June 2019). Data regarding anesthesia drugs, intubation technique, time to obtain consistent IONM signals, IONM data before and after positioning, and any corrective measures after positioning were collected and analyzed.

Results: Complete data were obtained form 46 patients. The patients were induced with fentanyl (2 µg/kg), propofol (2 mg/kg) and after checking mask ventilation atracurium (0.4 mg/kg) intravenous (IV) administration. All patients were intubated with manual inline stabilization. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol (75 µg/kg/min) and fentanyl (0.5 µg/kg/h). Motor and sensory evoked potentials (MEP and SSEP) were recorded every 10 minutes. The mean time required for obtaining SSEP signals were 15 ± 3 minutes and for MEP signals were 20 ± 5 minutes. In 43 patients, there was no significant change in IONM signals during positioning. In three patients, significant drop in IONM signals without change in EEG signals indicating local neurological injury. Surgical positioning was immediately adjusted to obtain baseline signals.

Conclusions: This study highlights the anesthetic feasibility of utilizing multimodal IONM during surgical positioning to predict and correct any position related neurological deficits prior to the start of definitive surgery. Prospective studies with adequate sample size will be needed to standardize the anesthetic protocol in these scenarios.



Publication History

Article published online:
25 March 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India