Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34(02): 077-085
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709470
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reconstruction of the Midface and Palate

Adam Bender-Heine
1   Department Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
,
Mark K. Wax
1   Department Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 May 2020 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The midface is a complex anatomic structure that is fundamental to many physiologic and homeostatic functions. It may be involved in many pathologic processes that require partial or complete removal. When this happens, reconstruction is mandatory to improve cosmetic outcome with its effect on social interaction as well as to provide an opportunity for complete orodental rehabilitation with restoration of all physiologic functions. This article will review the different reconstructive options available for complex defects of the maxillofacial complex. It will highlight the surgical options available to maximize functional restoration. Finally, it will discuss computer modeling to optimize reconstructive planning.

Keywords

free tissue transfer - surgical reconstruction - maxilla - maxillofacial reconstruction - dental rehabilitation
 

  • References

  • 1 Triana Jr RJ, Uglesic V, Virag M. , et al. Microvascular free flap reconstructive options in patients with partial and total maxillectomy defects. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000; 2 (02) 91-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Futran ND, Mendez E. Developments in reconstruction of midface and maxilla. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7 (03) 249-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Moreno MA, Skoracki RJ, Hanna EY, Hanasono MM. Microvascular free flap reconstruction versus palatal obturation for maxillectomy defects. Head Neck 2010; 32 (07) 860-868
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Futran ND, Haller JR. Considerations for free-flap reconstruction of the hard palate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125 (06) 665-669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kroll SS, Reece GP, Robb G, Black J. Deep-plane cervicofacial rotation-advancement flap for reconstruction of large cheek defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94 (01) 88-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ariyan S. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63 (01) 73-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Strasnick B, Calcaterra TC. Reconstruction of full-thickness cheek defects with combined cervicopectoral and pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps. Laryngoscope 1989; 99 (7, Pt 1): 757-760
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86 (04) 352-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Spiro RH, Strong EW, Shah JP. Maxillectomy and its classification. Head Neck 1997; 19 (04) 309-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E. A classification system and algorithm for reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (07) 2331-2346 , discussion 2347–2348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Brown JS, Shaw RJ. Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface: introducing a new classification. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11 (10) 1001-1008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E, Kraus DH, Strong EW, Shah JP. Reconstruction of total maxillectomy defects with preservation of the orbital contents. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (06) 1874-1884 , discussion 1885–1887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cordeiro PG, Wolfe SA. The temporalis muscle flap revisited on its centennial: advantages, newer uses, and disadvantages. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (06) 980-987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cordeiro PG, Bacilious N, Schantz S, Spiro R. The radial forearm osteocutaneous “sandwich” free flap for reconstruction of the bilateral subtotal maxillectomy defect. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 40 (04) 397-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Futran ND, Wadsworth JT, Villaret D, Farwell DG. Midface reconstruction with the fibula free flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128 (02) 161-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Peng X, Mao C, Yu GY, Guo CB, Huang MX, Zhang Y. Maxillary reconstruction with the free fibula flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (06) 1562-1569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Freije JE, Campbell BH, Yousif NJ, Matloub HS. Reconstruction after infrastructure maxillectomy using dual free flaps. Laryngoscope 1997; 107 (05) 694-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Uglesić V, Virag M, Varga S, Knezević P, Milenović A. Reconstruction following radical maxillectomy with flaps supplied by the subscapular artery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2000; 28 (03) 153-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Clark JR, Vesely M, Gilbert R. Scapular angle osteomyogenous flap in postmaxillectomy reconstruction: defect, reconstruction, shoulder function, and harvest technique. Head Neck 2008; 30 (01) 10-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Brown J, Bekiroglu F, Shaw R. Indications for the scapular flap in reconstructions of the head and neck. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48 (05) 331-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Solis RN, Mahaney J, Mohhebali R. , et al. Digital imaging evaluation of the scapula for prediction of endosteal implant placement in reconstruction of oromandibular defects with scapular free flaps. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (08) 730-736
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Succo G, Berrone M, Battiston B. , et al. Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272 (06) 1491-1501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar