Semin intervent Radiol 2020; 37(02): 214-219
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709208
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Vertebral Compression Fractures: Evaluation and Management

Sreekumar Madassery
1   Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
1   Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
14. Mai 2020 (online)

Abstract

Painful vertebral body compression fractures are prevalent in elderly patients. Two-thirds of patients will have spontaneous resolution of pain in 4 to 6 weeks and initial management is nonoperative with pain management and bracing. A focused history and exam can identify patients likely to benefit from vertebral body augmentation (e.g., vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty). Patients with persistent back pain and bone marrow edema on magnetic resonance imaging may benefit from injection of cement into the fractured vertebral body with either vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Patients most likely to benefit are those with severe pain refractory to nonoperative management who are offered intervention within 3 weeks. The procedure is usually performed as an outpatient with rare complications. Most patients report immediate, durable pain relief.

 
  • References

  • 1 Looker AC, Frenk SM. Percentage of adults aged 65 and over with osteoporosis or low bone mass at the femur neck or lumbar spine: United States, 2005. Centers Dis Control Prev 2010; 2015: 2005-2010
  • 2 Alexandru D, So W. Evaluation and management of vertebral compression fractures. Perm J 2012; 16 (04) 46-51
  • 3 Jay B, Ahn SH. Vertebroplasty. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013; 30 (03) 297-306
  • 4 Shah LM, Jennings JW, Kirsch CFE. , et al; Expert Panels on Neurological Imaging, Interventional Radiology, and Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® management of vertebral compression fractures. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (11S) S347-S364
  • 5 Bartynski WS. Clinical, anatomic, and imaging correlation in spine-related pain: the essential elements. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 12 (01) 2-10
  • 6 Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC. , et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Consensus Guidelines for the Periprocedural Management of Thrombotic and Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Image-Guided Interventions-Part II: Recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (08) 1168-1184.e1
  • 7 Reinhold M, Audigé L, Schnake KJ, Bellabarba C, Dai LY, Oner FC. AO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (10) 2184-2201
  • 8 Rzewuska M, Ferreira M, McLachlan AJ, Machado GC, Maher CG. The efficacy of conservative treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures on acute pain relief: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (04) 702-714
  • 9 Chang V, Holly LT. Bracing for thoracolumbar fractures. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 37 (01) E3
  • 10 Baerlocher MO, Saad WE, Dariushnia S, Barr JD, McGraw JK, Nikolic B. ; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (02) 165-170
  • 11 Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR. , et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (06) 557-568
  • 12 Chandra RV, Maingard J, Asadi H. , et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: What are the latest data?. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018; 39 (05) 798-806
  • 13 Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ. , et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (06) 569-579
  • 14 Firanescu CE, De Vries J, Lodder P. , et al. Vertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS IV): randomised sham controlled clinical trial. BMJ 2018; 361 (Vertos Iv). DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k1551.
  • 15 Klazen CAH, Lohle PNM, de Vries J. , et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2010; 376 (9746): 1085-1092
  • 16 Clark W, Bird P, Gonski P. , et al. Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 388 (10052): 1408-1416
  • 17 Dohm M, Black CM, Dacre A, Tillman JB, Fueredi G. ; KAVIAR Investigators. A randomized trial comparing balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35 (12) 2227-2236
  • 18 Evans AJ, Kip KE, Brinjikji W. , et al. Randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8 (07) 756-763
  • 19 Chehab MA, Thakor AS, Tulin-Silver S. , et al. Adult and pediatric antibiotic prophylaxis during vascular and IR procedures: a Society of Interventional Radiology Practice Parameter Update Endorsed by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (11) 1483-1501.e2
  • 20 Brinjikji W, Comstock BA, Gray L, Kallmes DF. Local anesthesia with bupivacaine and lidocaine for vertebral fracture trial (LABEL): a report of outcomes and comparison with the Investigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial (INVEST). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31 (09) 1631-1634
  • 21 Beall DP, Braswell JJ, Martin HD, Stapp AM, Puckett TA, Stechison MT. Technical strategies and anatomic considerations for parapedicular access to thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies. Skeletal Radiol 2007; 36 (01) 47-52
  • 22 Wang B, Zhao CP, Song LX, Zhu L. Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13 (01) 264
  • 23 Gu CN, Brinjikji W, Evans AJ, Murad MH, Kallmes DF. Outcomes of vertebroplasty compared with kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8 (06) 636-642
  • 24 Noriega DC, Rodrίguez-Monsalve F, Ramajo R, Sánchez-Lite I, Toribio B, Ardura F. Long-term safety and clinical performance of kyphoplasty and SpineJack® procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a pilot, monocentric, investigator-initiated study. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30 (03) 637-645
  • 25 Tsoumakidou G, Too CW, Koch G. , et al. CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40 (03) 331-342
  • 26 Syed MI, Avutu B, Shaikh A, Sparks H, Mohammed MI, Morar K. Vertebral osteomyelitis following vertebroplasty: is acne a potential contraindication and are prophylactic antibiotics mandatory prior to vertebroplasty?. Pain Physician 2009; 12 (04) E285-E290
  • 27 Nussbaum DA, Gailloud P, Murphy K. A review of complications associated with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty as reported to the Food and Drug Administration medical device related web site. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15 (11) 1185-1192
  • 28 Saliou G, Rutgers DR, Kocheida EM. , et al. Balloon-related complications and technical failures in kyphoplasty for vertebral fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31 (01) 175-179
  • 29 Anderson PA, Froyshteter AB, Tontz Jr WL. Meta-analysis of vertebral augmentation compared with conservative treatment for osteoporotic spinal fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2013; 28 (02) 372-382
  • 30 Shi MM, Cai XZ, Lin T, Wang W, Yan SG. Is there really no benefit of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (10) 2785-2799