CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU 2017; 07(02): 008-018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708704
Original Article

Assessment and Comparison of Oropharyngeal Airway Dimensions in Skeletal Class II Cases Treated With Forsus FRD and Twin Block Appliances

Kaushik Shetty
1   Lecturer, Dept of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, ABSMIDS, NITTE University, Deralakatte
,
Saidath K.
2   Professor, Dept of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, ABSMIDS, NITTE University, Deralakatte
,
Akhil Shetty
3   Reader, Dept of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, ABSMIDS, NITTE University, Deralakatte
,
M. S. Ravi
4   Professor and Head of Department, Dept of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, ABSMIDS, NITTE University, Deralakatte
,
Keerthan Shashidhar
5   Post Graduate Students, Dept of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, ABSMIDS, NITTE University, Deralakatte
,
Anushree A.
6   Post Graduate Students, Dept of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, ABSMIDS, NITTE University, Deralakatte
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Aims: To assess the changes in the oropharyngeal airway (OAW) dimensions in individuals with retrognathic mandible treated with Forsus FRD and Twin Block appliance to correct the skeletal Class II mal relationship.

Methodology: 40 individuals, with Class II skeletal pattern were selected as per inclusion criteria. Pre-treatment lateral cephalograms and hand wrist radiographs were obtained and analyzed. Group 1 with 20 individuals were treated with Forsus FRD and Group 2 with 20 individuals were treated with conventional Twin Block Appliance. Post treatment records were taken after the Class I molar relationship had been obtained. Pre and post treatment cephalograms were compared and analyzed. The data obtained was statistically evaluated using paired t test and unpaired t test.

Results: On comparison of pre-treatment and post-treatment cephalograms, increase in Oropharyngeal Airway (OAW) measurements, such as Superior posterior airway space (SPAS), Middle airway space (MAS) and Inferior airway space (IAS) was very highly significant.

Conclusion: Our results suggest the existence of a relationship between functional-orthopaedic treatment and increases in OAW dimensions in skeletal Class II growing subjects.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 05. Mai 2017

Angenommen: 13. Mai 2017

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. April 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Figueroa AA, Glupker TJ, Fitz MG, BeGole EA. Mandible, tongue, and airway in Pierre Robin sequence: a longitudinal cephalometric study. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 1991 Oct;28(4):425-34.
  • 2 Özbek MM, Miyamoto K, Lowe AA, Fleetham JA. Natural head posture, upper airway morphology and obstructive sleep apnoea severity in adults. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 1998 Apr 1;20(2):133-43.
  • 3 Murat Özbek M, UfukToygarMemikoglu T, Gögen H, Lowe AA, Baspinar E. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in skeletal Class II cases. The Angle orthodontist. 1998 Aug;68(4):327-36.
  • 4 Clark GT, Arand D, Chung E, Tong D. Effect of anterior mandibular positioning on obstructive sleep apnea.American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1993 Mar 1;147:624-.
  • 5 Waite PD, Wooten V, Lachner J, Guyette RF. Maxillomandibular advancement surgery in 23 patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1989 Dec 31;47(12):1256-61.
  • 6 Yassaei S, Bahrololoomi Z, Sorush M. Changes of tongue position and oropharynx following treatment with functional appliance. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2007 Jul 1;31(4):287-90.
  • 7 Born J, Muth S, Fehm HL. The significance of sleep onset and slow wave sleep for nocturnal release of growth hormone (GH) and cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1988 Dec 31;13(3):233-43.
  • 8 Späth-Schwalbe E, Hundenborn CH, Kern WE, Fehm HL, Born J. Nocturnal wakefulness inhibits growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-induced GH secretion. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1995 Jan;80(1):214-9.
  • 9 Dreyer CW. Review: Twin Block Functional Therapy Applications in Dentofacial Orthopaedics—Second Edition (2002). The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2003 Apr 1;25(2):213-4.
  • 10 Oktay H. A comparison of ANB, Wits, AF-BF, and APdI measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics and DentofacialOrthopedics. 1991 Feb 28;99(2):122-8.
  • 11 Chang HP. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. American Journal of Orthodontics and DentofacialOrthopedics. 1987 Aug 31;92(2):117-22.
  • 12 Jacobson A. The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. American journal of orthodontics. 1975 Feb 28;67(2):125-38.
  • 13 Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability. American Journal of Orthodontics and DentofacialOrthopedics. 2000 Jun 30;117(6):714-20.
  • 14 Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. American Journal of Orthodontics and DentofacialOrthopedics. 1998 Jul 31;114(1):15-24.
  • 15 Lund DI, Sandler PJ. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study. American Journal of Orthodontics and DentofacialOrthopedics. 1998 Jan 31;113(1):104-10.
  • 16 DeVincenzo JP. Changes in mandibular length before, during, and after successful orthopedic correction of Class II malocclusions, using a functional appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics and DentofacialOrthopedics. 1991 Mar 31;99(3):241-57.
  • 17 Aras A, Ada E, Saracoglu H, Gezer NS, Aras I. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study. American Journal of Orthodontics and DentofacialOrthopedics. 2011 Nov 30;140(5):616-25.
  • 18 Ozdemir F, Ulkur F, Nalbantgil D. Effects of fixed functional therapy on tongue and hyoid positions and posterior airway. The Angle Orthodontist. 2013 Aug 29;84(2):260-4.