Synlett 2020; 31(12): 1177-1181
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1707810
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Buchwald–Hartwig versus Microwave-Assisted Amination of Chloroquinolines: En Route to the Pyoverdin Chromophore

Philipp Seubert
a   Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany   Email: sabine.laschat@oc.uni-stuttgart.de
,
Marcel Freund
a   Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany   Email: sabine.laschat@oc.uni-stuttgart.de
,
Richard Rudolf
a   Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany   Email: sabine.laschat@oc.uni-stuttgart.de
,
Yulin Lin
a   Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany   Email: sabine.laschat@oc.uni-stuttgart.de
,
Luca Altevogt
a   Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany   Email: sabine.laschat@oc.uni-stuttgart.de
b   AG Compound Profiling and Screening, Helmholtz Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, Inhoffenstr. 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany   Email: ursula.bilitewski@helmholtz-hzi.de
,
Ursula Bilitewski
b   AG Compound Profiling and Screening, Helmholtz Zentrum für Infektionsforschung, Inhoffenstr. 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany   Email: ursula.bilitewski@helmholtz-hzi.de
,
Angelika Baro
a   Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany   Email: sabine.laschat@oc.uni-stuttgart.de
,
a   Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany   Email: sabine.laschat@oc.uni-stuttgart.de
› Author Affiliations
Generous financial support by the Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst des Landes Baden-Württemberg is gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank the European Commission for an ERASMUS fellowship for P.S.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 17 March 2020

Accepted after revision: 26 April 2020

Publication Date:
18 May 2020 (online)


Abstract

The reaction of 2-chloro-6,7-dimethoxy-3-nitroquinoline with a series of amines and aminoalkanoates under basic microwave-mediated conditions and under Buchwald–Hartwig amination conditions is reported. The microwave irradiation favored the reaction with amines, resulting in yields of up to 80%, whereas amino acid functionalization gave yields comparable to those of Buchwald–Hartwig amination. tert-Butyl (2R)-4-[(6,7-dimethoxy-3-nitroquinolin-2-yl)amino]-2-hydroxybutanoate was successfully cyclized to the pyoverdin chromophore, a subunit of siderophores.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes


    • For reviews, see:
    • 1a Bilitewski U, Blodgett JV, Duhme-Klair A.-K, Dallavalle S, Laschat S, Routledge A, Schobert R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 14360
    • 1b Johnstone TC, Nolan EM. Dalton Trans. 2015; 44: 6320
    • 1c Zhang T, Nolan EM. Metallomics 2012; 14: 866

      For reviews, see:
    • 2a Kurth C, Kage H, Nett M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016; 14: 8212
    • 2b Möllmann K, Heinisch L, Bauernfeind A, Köhler T, Ankel-Fuchs D. BioMetals 2009; 22: 615
  • 3 Cézard C, Farvaques N, Sonnet P. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015; 22: 165
  • 4 Gessard M. Ann. Inst. Pasteur (Paris) 1892; 6: 801
  • 5 Briskot G, Taraz K, Budzikiewicz H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1989; 375
  • 7 Greenwald J, Hoegy F, Nader M, Jourmet L, Mishin GL. A, Gracemann PL, Schalk IJ. J. Biol. Chem. 2007; 282: 2987
  • 8 Hennard C, Truong QC, Desnottes J.-F, Paris J.-M, Moreau NJ, Abdallah MA. J. Med. Chem. 2001; 44: 2139
  • 9 Kolasa T, Miller MJ. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 4246
  • 10 Mashiach R, Meijler MM. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1702

    • For synthetic studies on model compounds, see:
    • 11a Durrestin PC, Poole K, Begley TP. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 2215
    • 11b Jones RC. F, Yau SC, Iley JN, Smith JE, Dickson J, Elsegood MR. J, McKee V, Coles SJ. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 1519
  • 12 Schwendt G, Glasnov T. Monatsh. Chem. 2017; 148: 69
  • 13 General Procedure A Et3N (0.84 mmol) was added to a solution of 7 (0.19 mmol) and the appropriate amine hydrochloride 12·HCl (0.84 mmol) in absolute EtOH (3 mL) in a microwave vial, and the mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at 80 °C with microwave heating. The mixture was then poured onto H2O (20 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), and the solvents were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexanes–EtOAc). N-Benzyl-6,7-dimethoxy-3-nitroquinolin-2-amine (8d) Amorphous red solid; yield: 44 mg (87%); Rf  = 0.85 (hexanes–EtOAc 1:1). FTIR (ATR): 3800 (w), 3731 (w), 3627 (w), 3408 (w), 2928 (m), 2260 (w), 2211 (w), 2191 (w), 2172 (w), 2155 (w), 2139 (w), 2079 (w), 2044 (w), 2026 (w), 1986 (w), 1968 (w), 1611 (vs), 1569 (w), 1533 (m), 1494 (s), 1464 (m), 1417 (s), 1371 (m), 1352 (m), 1231 (vs), 1162 (m), 1009 (w), 846 (w), 734 (w), 700 (w), 616 (w), 493 (w), 469 (w), 448 (w), 424 (w) cm–1. 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.98 (s, 3 H), 4.05 (s, 3 H), 4.92 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2 H), 6.95 (s, 1 H), 7.26 (s, 1 H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.44 (d, J = 7.5, 2 H), 8.28 (s, 1 H), 8.55 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (176 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 45.32, 56.21, 56.47, 102.80, 106.49, 127.81, 128.11, 128.69, 129.00, 133.32, 135.29, 139.27, 148.26, 152.21, 154.66, 156.99. MS (ESI): m/z = 362.11 [M + Na]+, 340.13 [M]+, 294.14 [M-NO2]+. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H18N3O4: 340.1297; found: 340.1293.
  • 14 Surry D, Buchwald SL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 6338
  • 15 Dorel R, Grugel CP, Haydl AM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 17118
  • 16 General Procedure B The appropriate amine (1.02 mmol), 7 (0.85 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (34 µmol), XPhos (14; 68 µmol), and Cs2CO3 (4.09 mmol) were dissolved in degassed anhyd toluene (2 mL) under inert gas atmosphere, and the mixture was stirred for 20 h at the reflux. The suspension was cooled to r.t., filtered, and rinsed with toluene (50 mL) and EtOAc (10 mL). The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by chromatography [silica gel, hexanes–EtOAc (2:1)]. tert-Butyl (2R)-4-[(6,7-Dimethoxy-3-nitroquinolin-2-yl)amino]-2-(tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yloxy)butanoate [(R)-8h] Red solid; yield: 104 mg (25%); mp 76 °C; Rf  = 0.64 (hexanes–EtOAc); [α]D 20 +46.0 (c = 0.50, CH2Cl2). FTIR (ATR): 3407 (w), 2929 (m), 2854 (w), 2253 (w), 1740 (m), 1611 (s), 1569 (w), 1535 (m), 1495 (s), 1465 (m), 1418 (s), 1369 (m), 1356 (m), 1299 (m), 1231 (vs), 1160 (s), 1124 (m), 1075 (m), 1032 (s), 1006 (m), 913 (w), 869 (w), 846 (w), 813 (w), 767 (w), 732 (w), 697 (w), 647 (w), 615 (w), 577 (w), 471 (w), 419 (w) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.47 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 9 H, t-Bu), 1.52–1.96 (m, 6 H), 2.02–2.42 (m, 2 H), 3.39–3.63 (m, 0.5 H), 3.66–3.87 (m, 0.5 H), 3.96 (s, 3 H), 4.03–4.07 (m, 4 H), 4.40 (dd, J = 9.0 Hz, 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.63–4.77 (m, 2 H), 4.96 (m, 1 H), 6.91 (s, 1 H), 7.02 (s, 1 H), 8.21 (s, 1 H), 8.78 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 19.91, 25.37, 28.01, 28.11, 30.60, 32.08, 37.57, 56.09, 56.37, 63.42, 72.90, 81.63, 98.47, 99.87, 105.56, 106.25, 115.96, 134.78, 134.84, 147.48, 149.26, 149.51, 156.71, 171.81. MS (ESI): m/z = 514.22 [M + K]+, 514.22 [M + Na]+, 492.23 [M]+, 408.18, 352.11. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C24H33N3NaO8: 514.2160; found: 514.2162.
  • 17 tert-Butyl (1S)-8,9-Dimethoxy-5-nitro-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrimido[1,2-a]quinoline-1-carboxylate [(S)-15b] Red solid; yield: 18.0 mg (65%); mp 157 °C. Rf  = 0.4 (EtOAc–hexanes 2:1); [α]D 20 –18.0 (c = 0.50, CH2Cl2). FTIR (ATR): 2929 (m), 2853 (w), 2257 (w), 1994 (w), 1732 (m), 1650 (m), 1621 (m), 1596 (m), 1563 (m), 1526 (s), 1455 (m), 1428 (m), 1393 (m), 1367 (m), 1334 (m), 1269 (s), 1251 (vs), 1220 (m), 1204 (m), 1189 (m), 1150 (vs), 1099 (m), 1060 (m), 1013 (s), 988 (m), 912 (m), 879 (m), 846 (m), 817 (m), 727 (vs), 665 (m), 645 (m), 615 (w), 579 (w), 518 (w), 477 (w), 451 (w) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.44 (s, 9 H), 2.03–2.20 (m, 1 H), 2.35 (m, 1 H), 3.47 (m, 1 H), 3.76–3.64 (m, 1 H), 3.89 (s, 3 H), 3.92 (s, 3 H), 4.74 (dd, J = 6.2, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.35 (s, 1 H), 6.82 (s, 1 H), 7.60 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 22.91, 28.07, 40.61, 56.20, 56.46, 56.93, 83.41, 95.22, 109.69, 111.67, 129.40, 137.36, 141.40, 142.29, 144.96, 153.69, 169.94. MS (ESI): m/z = 412.15 [M + Na]+, 390.16 [M]+, 334.10 [M – t-Bu]+. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H24N3O6: 390.1660; found: 390.1642. UV/vis: ε232 nm = 7.55, ε299 nm = 2.59, ε358 nm = 2.54, ε433 nm = 1.08 (in 106 mL/mol cm).
  • 18 Orlandi M, Tosi F, Bonsignore M, Benaglia M. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 3941
  • 19 N 2-Hexyl-6,7-dimethoxyquinoline-2,3-diamine (16a) Colorless to light-yellow oil; yield: 13 mg (95%). FTIR (ATR): 3408 (w), 3246 (w), 2953 (m), 2926 (s), 2854 (m), 2160 (w), 2106 (w), 2082 (w), 2049 (w), 2027 (w), 1974 (w), 1724 (w), 1616 (m), 1509 (s), 1463 (s), 1446 (s), 1420 (vs), 1372 (m), 1254 (vs), 1216 (s), 1153 (m), 1014 (m), 882 (w), 848 (w), 804 (w), 752 (w), 731 (w), 614 (w), 453 (w), 433 (w) cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.89 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 7.6 Hz, 3 H), 1.17–1.54 (m, 6 H), 1.70 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.22 (bs, 2 H), 3.55 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.93 (s, 3 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H), 6.81 (s, 1 H), 7.05 (s, 1 H), 7.17 (s, 1 H), 8.08 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.07, 22.64, 26.94, 29.70, 31.69, 41.85, 55.91, 55.94, 104.90, 109.95, 118.08, 127.62, 129.71, 139.93, 146.49, 147.67, 149.65. MS (ESI): m/z = 338.16, 304.20 [M]+. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H26N3O2: 304.2020; found: 304.2019.