EFFICACY OF FUNCTIONAL NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION (FNMES) IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF HAND FUNCTIONS IN ACUTE STROKE SURVIVALS

Abstract

Stroke is a worldwide health problem. Hand function is one of the important factors which are affected in stroke. Stroke patients are usually given a conventional physiotherapy but if an additional FNMES is given it might show better improvement. By keeping these facts in view, the present study aims at evaluating and comparing the efficacy of conventional physiotherapy and adding FNMES will make any better outcome in the acute stroke survivals. The subjects were randomly assigned to any of the two groups; control group consisted of 15 subjects who received only conventional therapy for 4 weeks and experimental group consisting of 15 subjects who received an additional FNMES along with conventional physiotherapy for 4 weeks. The hand function was assessed on day 1 and to know the recovery, at the end of four weeks of intervention with the help of action research arm test (ARAT) and box and block test (BBT). At the end of 4 weeks of intervention both the groups showed significant improvements. On ARAT, control group showed a mean of 10.2000 whereas, experimental group showed mean of 20.8000 with p = 0.001 (p ≤ 0.05) and on BBT, the control group showed a mean of 21.666 and experimental group showed 30.933 with p = 0.41 (p ≤ S 0.05). Therefore the study concludes that, though there was improvement in both the groups, the experimental group who received an additional FNMES along with conventional physiotherapy showed better improvement in hand functions in the acute stroke survivals.

Keywords

Stroke - Hand function - FNMES - ARAT - BBT

Publication History

Article published online:
27 June 2020

• References

• 1 K. Park: Preventive and Social Medicine, 16th Edition, 2000, Pg no 208-283. Jabalpur, Banarasidas Bhanot
• 2 PK Sethi, “Management of Ischemic stroke”. Neurosciences Today 2002; 6:139-143.
• 3 K. Anand, D. Chowdhury, K.B. Singh, C.S. Pandav, S.K. Kapoor, Estimation of Mortality and Morbidity due to Strokes in India. Neuroepidemiology 2001;20:208-211 (DOI: 10.1159/000054789)
• 4 Patricia A. Downie, Cash’s textbook of Neurology for Physiotherapists, 4th edition, 1993, Page 241.
• 5 Paul Taylor, Jane Burridge, Sean Hagon, Paul Chappel, Ian Swain. Improvement in hand function and sensation in chronic stroke patients following electrical stimulation exercises- A pilot study. www.salisburyfes.com/hand2.htm
• 6 Fatima De N A, P.Shelton, Michel J Reading. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke, 2001 Jan: 32(1):107-12.
• 7 James Cauraugh, PhD; Kathye Light, PhD, PT; Sangbum Kim, MS; Mary Thigpen, PT, MHS Andrea Behrman, PhD, PT, Chronic Motor Dysfunction After Stroke. Recovering Wrist and Finger Extension by Electromyography-Triggered Neuromuscular Stimulation. Stroke. 2000;31:1360-1364
• 8 Yan T, Hui-Chan CW, Li Ls. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: a randomized placebo-controlled trail. Stroke 2005 Jan: 36(1):80-5.
• 9 John Chae, MD; Francois Bethoux, MD; Theresa Bohinc, OTR; Loreen Dobos, PT; Tina Davis, OTR; Amy Friedl, OTR, Neuromuscular Stimulation for Upper Extremity Motor and Functional Recovery in Acute Hemiplegia. Stroke 1998;29;975-979
• 10 Merletti R, Zelaschi F, Latella D, Galli M, Angeli S, Sessa MB. A control study of muscle force recovery in hemiparetic patients during treatment with functional electrical stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1978; 10:147–154.
• 11 Bowman BR, Baker LL, Waters RL. Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979; 60:497–502.
• 12 Winchester P, Montgomery J, Bowman B, Hislop H. Effects of feedback stimulation training and cyclical electrical stimulation on knee extension in hemiparetic patients. Phys Ther. 1983; 63:1096–1103.
• 13 Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73:220–227
• 14 Dimitrijevic M, Soroker N. Mesh-glove, II: Modulation of residual upper limb motor control after stroke with whole-hand electric stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994; 26:187–190
• 15 Faghri P, Rodgers M, Glaser R, Bors J, Ho C, Akuthota P. The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75:73–79
• 16 Dimitrijevic M, Stokic S, Wawro A, Wun C. Modification of motor control of wrist extension by mesh-glove electrical afferent stimulation in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77:252–258
• 17 Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Chalmers T. Functional electro stimulation in post stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77:549–553
• 18 Pomerov VM, King L, Pollock A, Bailey-Hallon A, Langhorne P. Electro stimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD003241
• 19 Ching-Lin Hsieh, I-Ping Hsueh, Fu-M Mei Chiang – Inter rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Oxford Journal; Age and Ageing, Vol 27 no 2:Pg 107-113
• 20 Vander Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter L M – The responsiveness of the action research arm test and Fugyl – Meyer assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine; Mar 2001; 33(3): page 110-113
• 21 Desrosier J, Bravo G, Hebert R, Dutil E, Mercier L – Validation of box and block test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, Validity and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Jul;75(7):751-5
• 22 Darcy A.Umphred, Neurological rehabilitation. 4th edition, 2001, pg 747
• 23 De Kroon J, Lizerman M, Chae J. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. Journal of Rehabil. Med.2005, March; 37(2)65-74
• 24 Baker LL, Yeh C, Wilson D. Electrical stimulation of wrist and fingers for hemiplegic patients. Phys Ther, 1979 Dec: 59(12):1495-9
• 25 Wany Ry, Yang YR, Tsai MW. Effects of functional electrical stimulation on upper limb motor function and shoulder range of motion in hemiplegic patients. AMJ Phys Med Rehabil 2002 Apr: 81(4):283-90
• 26 Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L, Gollub S, Lai SM, Revev D, Perera S, Yates J, Koch V, Rigler S, Johnson D, “Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in sub-acute stroke. Stroke 2003 Sep; 34(9):2173–80
• 27 Studenski SA, Wallace D, Duncan PW, Rymer M, Predicting stroke recovery: three- and six-month rates of patient-centered functional outcomes based on the Orpington Prognostic scale. “: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 March; 49(3):308-12
• 28 Johanna H. van der Lee, Heleen Beckerman, Gustaaf J. Lankhorst, Lex M. Bouter; The responsiveness of the action research arm test and the fugyl – meyer assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Volume 33, Number 3/July 1, 2001.Pg 110–113
• 29 Tiebin Yan, Christina W. Y. Hui-Chan and Leonard S. W. Li: Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Motor Recovery of the Lower Extremity and Walking Ability of Subjects With First Acute Stroke: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial; Stroke. 2005;36:80-8
• 30 Ottenbacher KJ, Jannell S. The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. Arch Neurol. 1993; 50:37–44
• 31 Asanuma H, Pavildes C. Neurobiological basis of motor learning in mammals. Neuroreport. 1997;8:1–4
• 32 Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, Hallett M, and Cohen LG. Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:1117–1123
• 33 Nudo RJ, Wise BM, Si Fuentis F et al; Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative trainings on motor recovery after ischaemic infarct. J. Science 1996;272:1791-1794