Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2021; 38(08): 784-790
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402716
Original Article

The Association between Placental Histopathology, Fetal Growth Restriction, and Preeclampsia in Twin Pregnancies

Kathy C. Matthews
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Presbyterian–Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
,
Nathan S. Fox
2   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
3   Maternal Fetal Medicine Associates, PLLC, New York, New York
,
Andrei Rebarber
2   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
3   Maternal Fetal Medicine Associates, PLLC, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aims to estimate the association between abnormal placental histopathology, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and preeclampsia (PEC) in twin pregnancies.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study of women with diamniotic twin pregnancies with live births at ≥24 weeks of gestation and available placental pathology. Findings were compared between women with and without FGR, which was defined as a birthweight <10th percentile, using singleton and twin growth curves, and those with and without PEC. The primary study outcome was a composite of abnormal placental histopathology. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Student's t-tests were used for analysis.

Results Among 859 patients with diamniotic twins, 806 (93.8%) had placental pathology. A total of 422 (52.4%) women had at least one twin with FGR, using a singleton growth curve. FGR affected 136 (16.9%) pregnancies when a twin growth curve was applied. There was no significant difference in composite outcome between groups, using either growth curve (45.5 vs. 44.8%, p = 0.84; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.06, 95% CI: 0.79–1.40 and 52.2 vs. 43.7%, p = 0.07; aOR: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.90–2.10). A total of 122 of 789 (15.5%) patients developed PEC. There was no significant difference in composite outcome between patients with and without PEC (41.8 vs. 45.4%, p = 0.46; aOR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.53–1.18).

Conclusion In twin pregnancies, FGR and PEC are not associated with abnormal placental histopathology. This suggests that the pathologic placental manifestations of these conditions may differ in twins and include factors other than those commonly described in singletons.

Keywords

fetal growth restriction - histopathology - multiple gestation - pathology - placenta - preeclampsia - small for gestational age - twins


Publication History

Received: 12 August 2019

Accepted: 19 November 2019

Article published online:
31 December 2019

© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018; 67 (08) 1-50
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Zhang Y. et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2016. MMWR Surveill Summ 2019; 68 (04) 1-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Grantz KL, Kawakita T, Lu YL, Newman R, Berghella V, Caughey A. SMFM Research Committee. SMFM special statement: state of the science on multifetal gestations: unique considerations and importance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221 (02) B2-B12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; ACOG Joint Editorial Committee. ACOG practice bulletin #56: multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104 (04) 869-883
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cleary-Goldman J, Morgan MA, Robinson JN, D'Alton ME, Schulkin J. Multiple pregnancy: knowledge and practice patterns of obstetricians and gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104 (02) 232-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fox NS, Rebarber A, Klauser CK, Roman AS, Saltzman DH. Intrauterine growth restriction in twin pregnancies: incidence and associated risk factors. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28 (04) 267-272
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Odegård RA, Vatten LJ, Nilsen ST, Salvesen KA, Austgulen R. Preeclampsia and fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96 (06) 950-955
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kibel M, Kahn M, Sherman C. et al. Placental abnormalities differ between small for gestational age fetuses in dichorionic twin and singleton pregnancies. Placenta 2017; 60: 28-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fox NS, Saltzman DH, Oppal S, Klauser CK, Gupta S, Rebarber A. The relationship between preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (04) 422.e1-422.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dunn L, Kumar S. Changes in intrapartum maternal placental growth factor levels in pregnancies complicated by fetal compromise at term. Placenta 2018; 74: 9-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Paules C, Dantas AP, Miranda J. et al. Premature placental aging in term small-for-gestational-age and growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53 (05) 615-622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Broere-Brown ZA, Schalekamp-Timmermans S, Jaddoe VWV, Steegers EAP. Fetal growth and placental growth factor umbilical cord blood levels. Fetal Diagn Ther 2018; 43 (01) 26-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kinzler WL, Vintzileos AM. Fetal growth restriction: a modern approach. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 20 (02) 125-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sebire NJ. Implications of placental pathology for disease mechanisms; methods, issues and future approaches. Placenta 2017; 52: 122-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Proctor LK, Kfouri J, Hiersch L. et al. Association between hypertensive disorders and fetal growth restriction in twin compared with singleton gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221 (03) 251.e1-251.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stanek J, Biesiada J. Clustering and classical analysis of clinical and placental phenotypes in fetal growth restriction and constitutional fetal smallness. Placenta 2016; 42: 93-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Srinivas SK, Edlow AG, Neff PM, Sammel MD, Andrela CM, Elovitz MA. Rethinking IUGR in preeclampsia: dependent or independent of maternal hypertension?. J Perinatol 2009; 29 (10) 680-684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Xiao R, Sorensen TK, Williams MA, Luthy DA. Influence of pre-eclampsia on fetal growth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 13 (03) 157-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mitani M, Matsuda Y, Makino Y, Akizawa Y, Ohta H. Clinical features of fetal growth restriction complicated later by preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009; 35 (05) 882-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Spinillo A, Gardella B, Adamo L, Muscettola G, Fiandrino G, Cesari S. Pathologic placental lesions in early and late fetal growth restriction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98 (12) 1585-1594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman MW. A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr 2003; 3: 6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Garite TJ, Clark RH, Elliott JP, Thorp JA. Twins and triplets: the effect of plurality and growth on neonatal outcome compared with singleton infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (03) 700-707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hollier LM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Outcome of twin pregnancies according to intrapair birth weight differences. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94 (06) 1006-1010
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cleary-Goldman J, D'Alton ME. Growth abnormalities and multiple gestations. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32 (03) 206-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM, Shen-Schwarz S, Smulian JC, Lai YL. Standards of birth weight in twin gestations stratified by placental chorionicity. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91 (06) 917-924
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' task force on hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 1122-1131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Redline RW. Classification of placental lesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (4, Suppl) S21-S28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Molteni RA, Stys SJ, Battaglia FC. Relationship of fetal and placental weight in human beings: fetal/placental weight ratios at various gestational ages and birth weight distributions. J Reprod Med 1978; 21 (05) 327-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dombrowski MP, Berry SM, Johnson MP, Saleh AA, Sokol RJ. Birth weight-length ratios, ponderal indexes, placental weights, and birth weight-placenta ratios in a large population. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994; 148 (05) 508-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Souza MA, de Lourdes Brizot M, Biancolin SE. et al. Placental weight and birth weight to placental weight ratio in monochorionic and dichorionic growth-restricted and non-growth-restricted twins. Clinics (São Paulo) 2017; 72 (05) 265-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Redline RW, Shah D, Sakar H, Schluchter M, Salvator A. Placental lesions associated with abnormal growth in twins. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2001; 4 (05) 473-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Barber E, Weiner E, Feldstein O. et al. The differences in placental pathology and neonatal outcome in singleton vs. twin gestation complicated by small for gestational age. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 298 (06) 1107-1114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Aviram A, Giltvedt MK, Sherman C. et al. The role of placental malperfusion in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia in dichorionic twin and singleton pregnancies. Placenta 2018; 70: 41-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar