Status of Women in Academic Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the status of women in academic ophthalmology in the United States and compare this to academic clinical departments in other clinical specialties.

Methods The study reviewed data from the American Association of Medical Colleges for the years 2003 to 2017. The number and percentage of women at different ranks, as well as number of women Chairs of clinical academic departments, were collected by specialty. The number of women residents from 2007 to 2017 was obtained from datasets published by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Trends of the percentage of women at different ranks were compared.

Results The percentage of women residents in ophthalmology has remained constant at around 42%, although it has declined slightly over the last 3 years. On the other hand, the number of women faculty in academic ophthalmology has gradually increased from 24 to 34% over 15 years. This increase has largely been at the Assistant Professor rank, with only a modest increase at the Professor rank.

Discussion The percentage of women in ophthalmology continues to lag behind the average for all clinical departments at every level. While this gender disparity is rapidly closing for Assistant Professors and slowly closing for Associate Professors and Chairs, it is widening for Professors. This demonstrates that women in ophthalmology are making some strides but are not being promoted to Professor at the same rate as other specialties. This may be the result of explicit and implicit biases, as well as phenomena such as imposter syndrome that are more common in women.

Keywords

gender disparity - women - academic ophthalmology - rank

• References

• 1 2017 Applicant and Matriculant Data Tables. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2017. https://aamc-black.global.ssl.fastly.net/production/media/filer_public/5c/26/5c262575-52f9-4608-96d6-a78cdaa4b203/2017_applicant_and_matriculant_data_tables.pdf . Accessed 04/24/2019
• 2 U.S. Medical School Faculty by Sex and Rank. 2017. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2019. https://www.aamc.org/download/486130/data/17table9.pdf . Accessed 04/24/2019
• 3 DeZee KJ, Byars LA, Magee CD, Rickards G, Durning SJ, Maurer D. The R.O.A.D. confirmed: ratings of specialties' lifestyles by fourth-year US medical students with a military service obligation. Fam Med 2013; 45 (04) 240-246
• 4 Newton DA, Grayson MS, Thompson LF. The variable influence of lifestyle and income on medical students' career specialty choices: data from two U.S. medical schools, 1998-2004. Acad Med 2005; 80 (09) 809-814
• 5 West CP, Drefahl MM, Popkave C, Kolars JC. Internal medicine resident self-report of factors associated with career decisions. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24 (08) 946-949
• 6 Grisham S. Personal Happiness vs Work Burnout. Medscape Ophthalmologist Lifestyle Report. 2018. https://www.medscape.com/slideshow/2018-lifestyle-ophthalmologist-6009233#1 . Accessed 04/24/2019
• 7 Carr PL, Raj A, Kaplan SE, Terrin N, Breeze JL, Freund KM. Gender differences in academic medicine: retention, rank, and leadership comparisons from the national faculty survey. Acad Med 2018; 93 (11) 1694-1699
• 8 Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. JAMA 2015; 314 (11) 1149-1158
• 9 Carnes M, Bartels CM, Kaatz A, Kolehmainen C. Why is John more likely to become department chair than Jennifer?. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2015; 126: 197-214
• 10 Turrentine FE, Dreisbach CN, St Ivany AR, Hanks JB, Schroen AT. Influence of gender on surgical residency applicants' recommendation letters. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 228 (04) 356-365.e3
• 11 Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109 (41) 16474-16479
• 12 Babcock L, Vesterlund MP, Weingart L. Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. Am Econ Rev 2017; 107 (03) 714-747
• 13 Rose Clance PI. A. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy (Chic) 1978; 15: 241-247
• 14 Villwock JA, Sobin LB, Koester LA, Harris TM. Impostor syndrome and burnout among American medical students: a pilot study. Int J Med Educ 2016; 7: 364-369
• 15 Oriel K, Plane MB, Mundt M. Family medicine residents and the impostor phenomenon. Fam Med 2004; 36 (04) 248-252
• 16 Armstrong MJ, Shulman LM. Tackling the imposter phenomenon to advance women in neurology. Neurol Clin Pract 2019; 9 (02) 155-159
• 17 Sandberg S. . Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. First ed. Knopf; 2013
• 18 Butkus R, Serchen J, Moyer DV, Bornstein SS, Hingle ST. ; Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians. Achieving gender equity in physician compensation and career advancement: a position paper of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168 (10) 721-723