CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2019; 52(03): 309-313
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400203
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Distraction Lengthening of First Metacarpal in Traumatic Thumb Amputations

Abid Saleem
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Max Hospital, Patparganj, Delhi, India
,
Ramesh Kumar Sharma
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
,
Parmod Kumar
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 27 June 2019

accepted after revision 19 July 2019

Publication Date:
26 December 2019 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Based on the level of the thumb loss, phalangization, toe-to-thumb transfer, pollicization, and distraction callotasis of the first metacarpal are the various options available for reconstruction. The aims of the study were to observe the length gained in the distraction process, duration of treatment required, functional recovery in the form of pinch strength, sensations, and patient satisfaction.

Patients and Methods It was a prospective study of 10 patients of thumb amputation, conducted from January 2014 to July 2015. The patients’ age, mode of injury, level of amputation, and advantages and disadvantages of distraction callotasis were evaluated.

Results The most common etiology of thumb loss was domestic accidents while working with a chaff cutter. The total duration of treatment was 124 (93–165) days and the mean gain in length was 25 (20–28) mm. The pinch strength increased from a mean of 0.91 to 2.06 kg, i.e., a 44.17% improvement from preoperative pinch strength. All of our patients retained their sensations of the reconstructed thumb post distraction.

Conclusions Among many options for thumb reconstruction, distraction callotasis is a simple and safer option in the selective group of patients who are not keen on toe-to-thumb transfer which provide a significant improvement. The longer duration of treatment is the disadvantage associated with the need for proper counselling beforehand.

 
  • References

  • 1 Beasley RW. Surgery of hand and finger amputations. Orthop Clin North Am 1981; 12 (04) 763-803
  • 2 Moy OJ, Peimer CA, Sherwin FS. Reconstruction of traumatic or congenital amputation of the thumb by distraction-lengthening. Hand Clin 1992; 8 (01) 57-62
  • 3 Reigstad A, Hetland KR, Waage S, Bye K, Røkkum M. Transfer of the second toe for reconstruction of the hand after trauma. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1992; 26 (01) 105-110
  • 4 Matev IB. Thumb reconstruction after amputation at the metacarpo-phalangeal joint by bone lengthening: a preliminary report of three cases. J Bone joint Surg 1970; 52-A: 957-965
  • 5 Seitz Jr WH. Shimko P, Patterson RW. Long-term results of callus distraction-lengthening in the hand and upper extremity for traumatic and congenital skeletal deficiencies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (Suppl. 02) 47-58
  • 6 Finsen V. Russ worm. Metacarpal lengthening after traumatic amputation of the thumb. J Bone and Joint Surg 1996; 78B: 133-136
  • 7 Joist A, Neuber M, Frebel T, Joosten U. [Callus distraction of the first metacarpal bone for thumb reconstruction after traumatic amputation]. Unfallchirurg 2000; 103 (12) 1073-1078
  • 8 Heitmann C, Levin LS. Distraction lengthening of thumb metacarpal. J Hand Surg [Br] 2004; 29 (01) 71-75
  • 9 Das SP, Mohanty RN, Das SK. Metacarpal lengthening by distraction histiogenesis in adults. Indian J Orthop 2009; 43 (04) 379-382
  • 10 Codvilla A. On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg (Phila Pa) 1905; 2: 353
  • 11 Mc Carthy GJ. Principles of craniofacial distraction. In: Thorpe CH. ed. Grab and Smith’s Plastic Surgery. 6th ed.. Wolters Kluwer; 2007: 96-102
  • 12 Burkhalter W. Mutilating injuries of the hand. Hand Clin 1986; 2 (01) 45-68
  • 13 Kanaujia RR, Fukuhara C, Yoshioka K, Miyamoto Y, Hoo KI. Experience with Ikuta’s phalangeal compression-distraction-fixation device. J Hand Surg Am 1988; 13 (04) 515-521
  • 14 Cobb TK, Stocks GW, May WF, Strauss MR, Lewis Jr. RC. Thumb reconstruction by metacarpal lengthening after traumatic loss at the level of the interphalangeal joint. Orthop Rev 1990; 19 (01) 47-51
  • 15 Hette K, Lemke T, Knaepler H. Distraction of the first metacarpal bone for thumb reconstruction [in German]. Unfallchirurg 1992; 95 (06) 294-297
  • 16 Toh S, Narita S, Arai K, Nakashima K, Tsubo K. Distraction lengthening by callotasis in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (02) 205-210
  • 17 Preisser P, Rudolf K, Partecke BD. Reconstruction of thumb through continuous lengthening of the first metacarpus [in German]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 1997; 9 (02) 150-161
  • 18 Houshian S, Ipsen T. Metacarpal and phalangeal lengthening by callus distraction. J Hand Surg [Br] 2001; 26 (01) 13-16
  • 19 Adani R, Corain M, Tarallo L, Fiacchi F. Alternative method for thumb reconstruction. Combination of 2 techniques: metacarpal lengthening and mini wraparound transfer. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (05) 1006-1011
  • 20 Zimmermann R. Reconstruction of amputated thumb through lengthening of first metacarpal. Orthop Traumatol 2002; 10 (04) 258-267
  • 21 Matev IB. The bone-lengthening method in hand reconstruction: twenty years’ experience. J Hand Surg Am 1989; 14 (2 Pt 2) 376-378
  • 22 Kömürcü M, Kürklü M, Demiralp B, Atesalp AS, Alsancak S, Basbozkurt M. First ray reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008; 32 (01) 50-56