Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2020; 55(04): 410-414
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700830
Artigos Originais
Artroscopia

Intraoperative graft decontamination during ACL reconstruction surgery[*]

Article in several languages: português | English
Roberto Cunha Luciano 
1   Hospital Orthomed Center, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil
,
Ígor Severino Macedo
1   Hospital Orthomed Center, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil
,
Rafael Henrique Naves Pereira
1   Hospital Orthomed Center, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil
,
Daniel Barros Pereira
1   Hospital Orthomed Center, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil
,
Dyego Vilela Luciano
1   Hospital Orthomed Center, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To evaluate different decontaminants for tendon grafts, proposing an antiseptic protocol for contaminated grafts.

Methods A total of 25 patients were tissue donors for the study. Each participant donated a 2.5-cm tendon sample, which was divided into 5 fragments with 5 mm each during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. The collected material was divided into 5 groups, totaling 125 samples. In total, four fragments of each patient were placed on the operating room floor for one minute for contamination, simulating the fall of the graft on the floor during surgery. The other fragment was immediately placed in a sterile container (group 1). One of the contaminated fragments was placed in the sterile container without being previously immersed in decontaminating solution (group 2). The remaining fragments were immersed for ten minutes in decontaminating solution: 0.5% chlorhexidine (group 3), 0.9% saline (group 4) and 0.55% ortho-phthalaldehyde (group 5), and, after this time, they were individually placed in a sterile container. The samples from the 5 groups were submitted to microbiological examination.

Results Bacteria were detected in 26% of the total samples in the microbiological tests, and in group 1 there was no growth of microorganisms. In group 2, bacterial growth was observed in 16 samples. Considering the evaluation of test groups 3, 4 and 5, the percentage of decontamination was higher than the growth of microorganisms in the respective cultures.

Conclusion The protocol suggested by the study showed that intraoperative graft decontamination is possible.

Keywords

autograft - anterior cruciate ligament - decontamination

* Study developed at Hospital Orthomed Center, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.




Publication History

Received: 28 March 2019

Accepted: 31 July 2019

Article published online:
09 January 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

 

  • Referências

  • 1 Khan M, Rothrauff BB, Merali F, Musahl V, Peterson D, Ayeni OR. Management of the contaminated anterior cruciate ligament graft. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (02) 236-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Davis N, Curry A, Gambhir AK. , et al. Intraoperative bacterial contamination in operations for joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81 (05) 886-889
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Struewer J, Ziring E, Oberkircher L, Schüttler KF, Efe T. Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (05) 809-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Torres-Claramunt R, Gelber P, Pelfort X. , et al. Managing septic arthritis after knee ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (03) 607-614
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pasque CB, Geib TM. Intraoperative anterior cruciate ligament graft contamination. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (03) 329-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Izquierdo Jr R, Cadet ER, Bauer R, Stanwood W, Levine WN, Ahmad CS. A survey of sports medicine specialists investigating the preferred management of contaminated anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (11) 1348-1353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Park JY, Lhee SH, Oh KS, Moon SG, Hwang JT. Clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repair for massive rotator cuff tear. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (02) 280-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hantes ME, Basdekis GK, Varitimidis SE, Giotikas D, Petinaki E, Malizos KN. Autograft contamination during preparation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (04) 760-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Desmond JL, Funahashi TT. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: association of graft choice with increased risk of early revision. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (05) 623-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cooper DE, Arnoczky SP, Warren RF. Contaminated patellar tendon grafts: incidence of positive cultures and efficacy of an antibiotic solution soak--an in vitro study. Arthroscopy 1991; 7 (03) 272-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Goebel ME, Drez Jr D, Heck SB, Stoma MK. Contaminated rabbit patellar tendon grafts. In vivo analysis of disinfecting methods. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (03) 387-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Stanford R, Solomon M, Levick M, Kohan L, Bell S. Sterilization of contaminated bone-tendon autografts using 10% povidone-iodine solution. Orthopedics 1999; 22 (06) 601-604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Molina ME, Nonweiller DE, Evans JA, Delee JC. Contaminated anterior cruciate ligament grafts: the efficacy of 3 sterilization agents. Arthroscopy 2000; 16 (04) 373-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Burd T, Conroy BP, Meyer SC, Allen WC. The effects of chlorhexidine irrigation solution on contaminated bone-tendon allografts. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (02) 241-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Parker RD, Maschke SD. Mechanical agitation and serial dilution: an option for anterior cruciate ligament graft sterilization. J Knee Surg 2008; 21 (03) 186-191
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sonnery-Cottet B, Archbold P, Zayni R. , et al. Prevalence of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction among professional athletes. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (11) 2371-2376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Williams III RJ, Laurencin CT, Warren RF, Speciale AC, Brause BD, O'Brien S. Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Diagnosis and management. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25 (02) 261-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gavriilidis I, Pakos EE, Wipfler B, Benetos IS, Paessler HH. Intra-operative hamstring tendon graft contamination in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (09) 1043-1047
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Plante MJ, Li X, Scully G, Brown MA, Busconi BD, DeAngelis NA. Evaluation of sterilization methods following contamination of hamstring autograft during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (03) 696-701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Abdel-Aziz A, Radwan YA, Rizk A. Multiple arthroscopic debridement and graft retention in septic knee arthritis after ACL reconstruction: a prospective case-control study. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (01) 73-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Badran MA, Moemen DM. Hamstring graft bacterial contamination during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical and microbiological study. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (09) 1899-1903
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Alomar AZ, Gawri R, Roughley PJ, Haglund L, Burman M. The effects of chlorhexidine graft decontamination on tendon graft collagen and cell viability. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (07) 1646-1653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Han Y, Giannitsios D, Duke K, Steffen T, Burman M. Biomechanical analysis of chlorhexidine power irrigation to disinfect contaminated anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (07) 1528-1533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar