CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2006; 39(02): 175-178
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699157
Case Report
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Does giant breast tumour have an increased complication risk for subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction?

Kenan Coban Yusuf
Sutcuimam University School of Medicine, Plastic Surgery Department, Kahramanmaras, *Numune Hospital, Plastic Surgery Department, Adana /Turkey
,
Gumus Nazim
Sutcuimam University School of Medicine, Plastic Surgery Department, Kahramanmaras, *Numune Hospital, Plastic Surgery Department, Adana /Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 May 2020 (online)

ABSTRACT

Prosthetic breast reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy has some complications such as skin necrosis, loss of areola-nipple, haematoma, seroma, infection, displacement of implants, areola nipple disposition and inadequate skin construction resulting in skin wrinkles. We discuss whether giant breast tumour has an increased complication risk after the surgery, in this paper which reports a patient with giant breast tumour i.e., a large recurrent fibroadenoma in the same breast. Subcutaneous mastectomy was performed without skin reduction through submammary incision. Total muscular coverage was provided for immediate reconstruction using 350 cc gel- filled breast implant. Though haematoma or seroma didn′t exist, superficial skin necrosis developed subsequently. Spontaneous epithelisation was observed all of the necrosis area to cover this area in a few weeks. Initially, skin coverage and areola nipple position on the breast was acceptable, but 8 months after the operation, skin reconstruction was not good enough to provide good skin envelope. Just as as skin lack or insufficiency is a severe problem in breast reconstruction, excess skin may be another trouble for providing an acceptable breast shape.

 
  • 1 Jarrett JR, Cutler RG, Teal DF. Aesthetic refinements in prophylactic subcutaneous mastectomy with submuscular reconstruction. Plast Reconst Surg 1982; 69: 624-31
  • 2 Agaoglu G, Ozgur F, Erk Y. Unilateral virginal breast hypertrophy. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 45: 451-3
  • 3 Aygit AC, Altan A, Afsar Y. Breast reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy for extensive benign masses. Breast J 2004; 10: 163-4
  • 4 Silfen R, Skoll PJ, Hudson DA. Florid juvenile (cellular) fibroadenomatosis in the adolescent: A case for subcutaneous mastectomy?. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1999; 23: 413-5
  • 5 Yii NW, Khoo CT. Salvage of infected expander prostheses in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 1087-92
  • 6 Palmieri B, Baitchev G, Grappolini S, Costa A, Benuzzi G. Delayed nipple-sparing modified subcutaneous mastectomy: rationale and technique. Breast J 2005; 11: 173-8
  • 7 De FLorenzi, Yamaguchi S, Petit JY, Rietjens M, Garusi C, Martella S. et al. Evaluation of skin perfusion after nipple-sparing mastectomy by indocyanine green dye. Preliminary results. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2005; 24: 347-54
  • 8 Yiacoumettis AM. Two staged breast reconstruction following prophylactic bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58: 299-305
  • 9 Niamh C, Ian T. Subglandular breast reduction: The evolution of a minimal scar approach to breast reduction. Plast Reconst Surg 2004; 113: 175-84
  • 10 Lejour M. Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconst Surg 1994; 94: 100-14
  • 11 Simmons RM, Adamovich TL. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83: 885-99