Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2004; 37(01): 44-50
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699031
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Reliance on double pedicle TRAM flap technique in breast reconstruction based on mammographic evidence

Fuat Yüksel
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Radiology, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa Hospital, Istanbul-Türkiye
,
Emir Silit
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Radiology, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa Hospital, Istanbul-Türkiye
,
Bahattin Çeliköz
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Radiology, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa Hospital, Istanbul-Türkiye
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 January 2020 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Breast reconstruction is now a part of the overall treatment of breast cancer. Its main drawback is rather the suspicion to conceal any probable recurrence. Fat necrosis is a particularly important finding because it can be mistaken for a local recurrence. Alternatively, local recurrences may be dismissed as areas of fat necrosis. Fat necrosis is a relatively minor complication of TRAM flap breast reconstruction but one that can induce anxiety, expense, and inconvenience for patients and concerns about tumor recurrence. The techniques selected for reconstruction must carry the least risks for these awful complications.

15 breast cancer cases were treated in our center by using Bostwick′s principles. These include double-pedicle technique in cases with one or two risk factors and added vascular delay two weeks prior to this procedure in cases with more risk factors.

During the follow up period, neither the patients nor her physicians experienced any nodules in their treatment sites clinically. One case is the only exception that she felt hardness but it softened. Mammographically, no images of fat necrosis were observed in any of the cases.

In contrary to other studies reporting no advantages of double pedicle technique to lessen the risk for fat necrosis, we observed fat necrosis only in one of 15 cases. This may be because both sides of the flap are supplied axially and delay procedures are added in high risk patients.

KEY WORDS

Tram Flap - double Pedicle - Mammography
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Coleman III J. Bostwick III J. Breast Cancer. In Plast and Reconstr breast surg. Bostwick III J. (ed) St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2000: 663
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Eidelman Y. Liebling RW. Buchbinder S. et al Mammography in the evaluation of masses in breasts reconstructed with TRAM flaps. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41: 229
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Harris J. Morrow M. Treatment of early stage breast cancer. In Harris J. Lippman M. Morrow M. Hellman S. eds Diseases of the breast. Philadelphia: Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1996: 487-547
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Singletary SE. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: the MD. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 1996; 3: 411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kroll SS. Gherardini G. Martin JE. et al Fat necrosis in free and pedicled flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Yüksel F. Çeliköz B. Double-pedicle Tram flap breast reconstruction: Following Bostwick′s principles. Aesth Plast Surg 2002; 26: 444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bostwick III J. Abdominal flap reconstruction Plast and Reconstr breast surg. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2000: 981
    Google Scholar
  • 8 American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system. 3rd. ed Reston: Va: American College of Radiology; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Noone RB. Frazier TG. Noone GC. et al Recurrence of breast carcinoma following immediate reconstruction: a 13-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 93: 96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Shaikh N. LaTrenta G. Swistel A. et al Detection of recurrent breast cancer after TRAM flap reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47: 602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Holmes FA. Singletary ES. Kroll SS. Holbert JM. et al Fat necrosis in an autogenously reconstructed breast mimicking recurrent carcinoma at mammography. Breast Dis 1988; 1: 211
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Hogge JP. Robinson RE. Magnant CM. Zuurbier RA. The mammographic spectrum of fat necrosis of the breast. Radiographics 1995; 15: 1347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Leibman AJ. Styblo TM. Bostwick III J. Mammography of the postreconstruction breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 68
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Helvie MA. Bailey JE. Roubidoux MA. et al Mammographic screening of TRAM flap breast reconstructions for detection of nonpalpable recurrent cancer. Radiology 2002; 224: 211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mendelson EB. Evaluation of the Postoperative Breast. In Bassett DW. (Ed.) (Radiologic Clinics of North America; Vol.30). Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992: 107-38
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Kroll SS. Schusterman MA. Tadjalli HE. Singletary SE. Ames C. Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 1997; 4: 193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schusterman MA. Kroll SS. Miller MJ. et al The free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction: A single center′s experience with 211 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Boyd JB. Taylor GI. Corlett R. The vascular territories of the superior epigastric and the deep inferior epigastric systems. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bunkis J. Walton RL. Mathes S. et al Experience with the transverse lower rectus abdominis operation for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 819
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Codner MA. Bostwick III J. The delayed TRAM flap. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 25: 183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar