Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2012; 06(03): 280-286
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698962
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel

A. Ruya Yazici
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TURKIYE
,
Zeren Yildirim
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TURKIYE
,
Atila Ertan
2   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TURKIYE
,
Gül Ozgunaltay
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TURKIYE
,
Berrin Dayangac
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TURKIYE
,
Sibel A Antonson
3   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, USA
,
Donald E Antonson
3   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 October 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of several self-etch adhesives to their two-step predecessors to ground and unground enamel.

Methods: Seventy-five extracted, non-carious human third molar teeth were selected for this study. The buccal surfaces of each tooth were mechanically ground to obtain flat enamel surfaces (ground enamel), while the lingual surfaces were left intact (unground enamel). The teeth were randomly divided into five groups according to the adhesive systems (n=15): one-step self-etch adhesive - Clearfil S3 Bond, its two-step predecessor - Clearfil SE Bond, one-step self-etch adhesive - AdheSE One, and its two-step predecessor - AdheSE, and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive - Adper Single Bond 2(control). After application of the adhesives to the buccal and lingual enamel surfaces of each tooth, a cylindrical capsule filled with a hybrid composite resin (TPH) was seated against the surfaces. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, followed by thermocycling (5°C-55°C/500 cycles). They were subjected to shear bond strength test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute. The data were compared using a two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test at P<.05

Results: All adhesives exhibited statistically similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel except for the etch-and-rinse adhesive that showed significantly higher bond strengths than the self-etch adhesives (P<.05). No significant differences in bond strength values were observed between ground and unground enamel for any of the adhesives tested (P=.17).

Conclusions:Similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel were achieved with one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors. Enamel preparation did not influence the bonding performance of the adhesives tested. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:280-286)

Key words

Bond strength - self-etch adhesives - etch and rinse adhesives - enamel
 

  • References

  • 1 Van Meerbeek B, de Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challanges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235
  • 2 Perdigao J, Swift Jr EJ. Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentin adhesion. In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift Jr EJ, editors. Sturdevant’s Art and Sscience of Operative Dentistry, St Louis: Mosby, 2006. p.257-258
  • 3 De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:39-49
  • 4 Yazici AR, Çelik Ç, Özgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. Bond strength of different adhesive systems to dental hard tissues. Oper Dent 2007;32:166-172
  • 5 Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief story and state of the art. Quintessence Int 1995;26:95-100
  • 6 Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary selfetching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001;17:430-444
  • 7 Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary selfetching systems. I.Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308
  • 8 Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2005;21:895-910
  • 9 Sato M, Miyazaki M. Comparison of depth of dentin etching and resin infiltration with single-step adhesive systems. J Dent 2005;33:475-484
  • 10 Perdigao J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin N Am 2007;51:333-357
  • 11 Shinohara MS, Oliveria MT, Hipolito VD, Giannini M, Goes MF. SEM analysis of the acid-etched enamel patterns promoted by acidic monomers and phosphoric acids. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:427-435
  • 12 Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobbb DS. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:115-124
  • 13 Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 1999;27:523-530
  • 14 Perdigao J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of selfetching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:32-41
  • 15 Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Kuboki T, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Van Meerbeek B. Enamelsmear compromises bonding by mild self-etch adhesives. 2010;89:1505-1509.
  • 16 Daronch M, De Goes MF, Grande RH, Chan DC. Antibacterial and conventional self-etching primer system: morphological evaluation of intact primary enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003;27:251-256
  • 17 Ripa LW, Gwinnett AJ, Buonocore MG. The ‘prismless” outer layer of deciduous and permanent enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1966;11:41-48
  • 18 Poole DFG, Johnson NW. The effect of different demineralizing agent on enamel surface studies by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 1967;12:1621-1634
  • 19 Robinson C, Weatherell JA, Hallsworth AS. Variation in composition of dental enamel within thin ground tooth sections. Caries Res 1971;5:44-57
  • 20 Perdigao J, Gomes G, Duarte S Jr, Lopes MM. Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer. Oper Dent 2005;30:492-499
  • 21 Senawongse P, Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Bond strengths of current adhesive systems on intact and ground enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:107-115
  • 22 Lührs AK, Guhr S, Schilke R, Borchers L, Geurtsen W, Günay H. Shear bond strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel with additional phosphoric acid etching. Oper Dent 2008;33:155-162
  • 23 Watanabe T, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Ando S, Miyazaki M. Effect of prior acid etching on bonding durability of single-step adhesives. Oper Dent 2008;33:426-433
  • 24 Tay FR, Pashley DH, King NM, Carvalho RM, Tsai J, Lai SC, Marquezini L Jr. Aggressiveness of self-etch adhesives on unground enamel. Oper Dent 2004;29:309-316
  • 25 Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LA, Sinhoreti MA. Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. Am J Dent 1999;12:181-184
  • 26 Loguercio AD, Moura SK, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Patzlaff RT, Grande RH, Reis A. Durability of enamel bonding using two-step self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Oper Dent 2008;33:75-84
  • 27 Reis A, Moura K, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, de Andrade AM, Loguercio AD.Durability of enamel bonding using onestep self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Oper Dent 2009;34:181-191
  • 28 Pivetta MR, Moura SK, Barroso LP, Lascala AC, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Grande RH. Bond strength and etching pattern of adhesive systems to enamel: effects of conditioning time and enamel preparation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20:322-335
  • 29 Sengun A, Orucoglu H, Ipekdal I, Ozer F. Adhesion of two bonding systems to air-abraded or bur-abraded human enamel surfaces. Eur J Dent 2008;2:167-175
  • 30 Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissue. Tokyo Quintessence Publishing Cop p 39–44 1998
  • 31 Hobson RS, McCabe JF. Relationships between enamel etch characteristics and resin-enamel bond strength. Br Dent J 2002;192:463-468
  • 32 Burrow MF, Kitasako Y, Thomas CD, Tagami J. Comparison of enamel and dentin microshear bond strengths of a twostep self-etching priming system with five all-in-one. Oper Dent 2008;33:456-460
  • 33 Ibarra G, Vargas M, Geurtsen W. Interfacial and surface characterization of two self-etching adhesive systems and a total-etch adhesive after bonding to ground and unground bovine enamel--a qualitative study. Clin Oral Invest 2006;10:331-341
  • 34 Sidhu SK, Omata Y, Tanaka T, Koshiro K, Spreafico D, Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, Sano H. Bonding characteristics of newly developed all-in-one adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;80:297-303
  • 35 Perdigao J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW. In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part I- Microtensile bond strengths. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:367-373
  • 36 Britta LC, Martins M, França FM. Influence of different primer application times on bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to unground enamel. Oper Dent 2009;34:43-50
  • 37 Ishikawa A, Shimada Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Micro-tensile and micro-shear bond strengths of current self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2007;20:161-166
  • 38 Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on the adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-458