CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2012; 06(03): 270-279
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698961
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Efficiency of caries risk assessment in young adults using Cariogram

Esra Uzer Celik
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University
,
Necmi Gokay
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University
,
Mustafa Ates
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aims of this study were to: (1) evaluate the caries risk in young adults using Cariogram and (2) compare the efficiency of Cariogram with the regression risk models created using the same variables in Cariogram by examining the actual caries progression over a 2-year period.

Methods: The aims of this study were to: (1) evaluate the caries risk in young adults using Cariogram and (2) compare the efficiency of Cariogram with the regression risk models created using the same variables in Cariogram by examining the actual caries progression over a 2-year period.

Results: Diet frequency, plaque amount and secretion rate were significantly associated with caries increment (P<.05). Cariogram and the regression risk models explained the caries formation at a higher rate than single-variables. However, the regression risk model developed by diet frequency, plaque amount and secretion rate explained the caries formation similar to Cariogram, while the other regression model developed by all variables used in Cariogram explained the caries formation at a higher rate than this computer program.

Conclusions: Cariogram is effective and can be used for caries risk assessment instead of single variables; however, it is possible to deve

 
  • References

  • 1 Harel-Raviv M, Laskaris M, Chu KS. Dental caries and sugar consumption into the 21st century. Am J Dent 1996;9:184-190
  • 2 Øgaard B. The cariostatic mechanism of fluoride. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;20:10-17
  • 3 Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Flaitz C. Biological factors in dental caries: role of saliva and dental plaque in the dynamic process of demineralization and remineralization (part 1). J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003;28:47-52
  • 4 Addy M, Dummer PM, Griffiths G, Hicks R, Kingdon A, Shaw WC. Prevalence of plaque, gingivitis and caries in 11-12-year-old children in South Wales. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1986;14:115-118
  • 5 Tagliaferro EP, Pereira AC, Meneghim Mde C, Ambrosano GM. Assessment of Dental Caries predictors in a sevenyear longitudinal study. J Public Health Dent 2006;66:169-173
  • 6 Zhang Q, Bian Z, Fan M, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Salivary mutans streptococci counts as indicators in caries risk assessment in 6-7-year-old Chinese children. J Dent 2007;35:177-180
  • 7 Azrak B, Callaway A, Willershausen B, Ebadi S, Gleissner C. Comparison of a new chairside test for caries risk assessment with established methods in children. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2008;118:702-708
  • 8 Wigen TI, Wang NJ. Caries and background factors in Norwegian and immigrant 5-year-old children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2010;38:19-28
  • 9 Beck JD. Risk revisited. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:220-225
  • 10 Stamm JW, Stewart PW, Bohannan HM, Dishey JA, Graves RC, Abernathy JR. Risk assessment for oral diseases. Adv Dent Res 1991;5:4-17
  • 11 Tinanoff N. Critique of evolving methods for caries risk assessment. J Dent Educ 1995;59:980-984
  • 12 Powell LV. Caries risk assessment: relevance to the practitioner. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:349-353
  • 13 Hansel Petersson G, Twetman S, Bratthall D. Evaluation of a computer program for caries risk assessment in schoolchildren. Caries Res 2002;36:327-340
  • 14 Bratthall D, Hansel Petersson G. Cariogram-a multifactorial risk assessment model for a multifactorial disease. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:256-264
  • 15 Hansel Petersson G, Fure S, Bratthall D. Evaluation of a computer-based caries risk assessment program in an elderly group of individuals. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:164-171
  • 16 Ruiz Miravet A, Montiel Company JM, Almerich Silla JM. Evaluation of caries risk in a young adult population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;12: E412-418
  • 17 Mojon P. Oral health and respiratory infection. J Can Dent Assoc 2002;68:340-345
  • 18 Könönen E, Jousimies-Somer H, Bryk A, Kilp T, Kilian M. Establishment of streptococci in the upper respiratory tract: longitudinal changes in the mouth and nasopharynx up to 2 years of age. J Med Microbiol 2002;51:723-730
  • 19 http://www.mah.se/upload/OD/cariogram%20program%20caries/cariogmanual201net.pdf, (access date: 22.05.2011)
  • 20 World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: Basic methods. 3rd ed., Geneva; WHO; 1987. p.39-44
  • 21 Disney JA, Graves RC, Stamm JW, Bohannan HM, Abernathy JR, Zack DD. The University of North Carolina caries risk assessment study: further developments in caries risk prediction. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992;20:64-75
  • 22 Scheinin A, Pienihakkinen K, Tiekso J, Holmberg S. Multifactorial modeling for root caries prediction. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992;20:35-37
  • 23 Al Ghanim NA, Adenubi JO, Wyne AA, Khan NB. Caries prediction model in pre-school children in Riyadh, Saudia Arabia. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998;8:115-122
  • 24 Powell LV, Leroux BG, Persson RE, Kiyak HA. Factors associated with caries incidence in an elderly population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:170-176. Caries risk assessment using Cariogram July 2012 - Vol.6 279 European Journal of Dentistr
  • 25 Zero D, Fontana M, Lennon AM. Clinical applications and outcomes of using indicators of risk in caries management. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1126-1132
  • 26 Holgerson PF, Twetman S, Stecksen-Blicks C. Validation of an age-modified caries risk assessment program (Cariogram) in preschool children. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:106-112
  • 27 Beck J, Kohout R, Hunt R. Identification of high risk adults; attitudes, social factors and disease. Int Dent J 1988;38:231-238