Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698960
In vivo assessment of secondary caries and dentin characteristics after traditional amalgam restorations
Publication History
Publication Date:
30 September 2019 (online)
ABSTRACT
Objectives:This study aimed to evaluate in vivo the occurrence of secondary caries and dentin characteristics in permanent molars after traditional amalgam restorations, by means of clinical visual examination, radiographs and laser-induced fluorescence (LF) (DIAGNOdent).
Methods:Thirty first permanent molars of 30 schoolchildren in the 7 to14 year-old age group were included. Caries was removed by hand. Thus, indirect pulp capping was performed with glassionomer cement (GIC), the cavity was varnished and amalgam filled. LF was measured before and after cavity preparation and after a 12-month observation period. Dentin color after cavity preparation and after the 12-month observation period was recorded. Recurrent caries was also investigated by visual clinical and radiographic examinations, in addition to dentin thickness between pulp and indirect GIC pulp capping. Data was analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measurements, paired “t” test and descriptive statistic.
Results:There were statistically significant differences (P<.05) among LF scores for dentin in all periods evaluated, with the lowest scores shown after 12 month of observation. There was no statistical difference between dentin color after cavity preparation and following 12 months of observation. Moreover, there was no recurrent caries attack at 12-month follow-up; dentin thickness between pulp and indirect GIC pulp capping was similar between baseline and final observation periods. It was concluded that the clinical restorative procedure using hand caries removal, indirect pulp capping with GIC, varnishing and amalgam filling the cavity did not provide secondary caries and increased dentin mineral content after 12 months. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:263-269)
-
References
- 1 Dennison JB, Hamilton JC. Treatment decisions and conservation of tooth structure. Dent Ciln N Am 2005;49:825-845
- 2 Silva NR, Carvalho RM, Pegoraro LF, Tay FR, Thompson VP. Evaluation of a self-limiting concept in dentinal caries removal. J Dent Res 2006;85:282-286
- 3 ten Cate JM. Remineralization of caries lesions extending into dentin. J Dent Res 2001;80:1407-1411
- 4 McComb D. Systematic review of conservative operative caries management strategies. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1154-1161
- 5 Kidd EA. How ‘clean’ must a cavity be before restoration? Caries Res 2004;38:305-313
- 6 Sato Y, Fusayama T. Removal of dentin by fuchsin staining. J Dent Res 1976;55:678-683
- 7 Krause F, Braun A, Eberhard J, Jepsen S. Laser fluorescence measurements compared to electrical resistance of residual dentine in excavated cavities in vivo. Caries Res 2007;41:135-140
- 8 Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. In vitro validation of carious dentin removed using different excavation criteria. Am J Dent 2003;16:228-230
- 9 Smales RJ, Ngo HC, Yip KHK, Yu C. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars. Am J Dent 2005;18:188-192
- 10 Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Textbook of clinical cariology. Copenhagen, Munksgaard 1994
- 11 Willmott NS, Wong FS, Davis GR. An X-ray microtomography study on the mineral concentration of carious dentine removed during cavity preparation in deciduous molars. Car Res 2007;41:129-134
- 12 Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis Jr. JW, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:55-66
- 13 Alves LS, Fontanella V, Damo AC, Ferreira de Oliveira E, Maltz M. Qualitative and quantitative radiographic assessment of sealed carious dentin: a 10-year prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:135-141
- 14 Silveira AD, Borges BC, Almeida HV, Lima KC, Pinheiro IV. Progression of Non-Cavitated Lesions in Dentin through a Nonsurgical Approach: A Preliminary 12-Month Clinical Observation. Eur J Dent 2012;6:34-42
- 15 Cenci MS, Piva E, Potrich F, Formolo E, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials. Braz Dent J 2004;15:13-18
- 16 Vermeesch G, Leloup G, Delmee M, Vreven J. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: relatioship between acidity and material setting phase. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:368-374
- 17 da Silva AF, Piva E, Demarco FF, Correr-Sobrinho L, Osinga PW. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume. Oper Dent 2006;31:377-383
- 18 Thompson VP, Kaim JM. Nonsurgical treatment of incipient and hidden caries. Dent Clin N Am 2005;49:905-921
- 19 Bjorndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res 1997;31:411-417
- 20 Oliveira EF, Carminatti G, Fontanella V, Maltz M. The monitoring of deep caries lesions after incomplete dentine caries removal: results after 14-18 months. Clin Oral Invest 2006;10:134-139
- 21 Hibst R, Paulus R, Lussi A. Detection of occlusal caries by laser luorescence. Basic and clinical investigations. Med Laser Appl 2001;16:205-213
- 22 Chu CH, Lo EC, You DS. Clinical diagnosis of fissure caries with conventional and laser-induced fluorescence techniques. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25:355-362
- 23 Kitasako Y, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Aoki K, Pereira PN, Tagami J. Physiological remineralization of artificially demineralized dentin beneath glass ionomer cements with and without bacterial contamination in vivo. Oper Dent 2003;28:274-280
- 24 ten Cate, van Duinen RN. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995;74:1266-1271
- 25 Tantbirojn D, Feigal RJ, Ko CC, Versluis A. Remineralized dentin lesions induced by glass ionomer demonstrate increased resistance to subsequent acid challenge. Quintessence Int 2006;37:273-281
- 26 Pinheiro IV, Borges BC, Colombo AP, Lima KC. Clinical and microbiological characteristics in predicting dentine caries progression. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2009;22:143-149
- 27 Silveira AD, Borges BC, Almeida HV, Lima KC, Pinheiro IV. Progression of non-cavitated lesions in dentin through a nonsurgical approach: a preliminary 12-month clinical observation. Eur J Dent 2011;5:229-236. In vivo analysis of traditional amalgam restorations July 2012 - Vol.6 269 European Journal of Dentistr
- 28 Gallato A, Angnes G, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of different amalgams with different liners. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:571-576
- 29 Cunha LG, Alonso RC, Souza-Júnior EJ, Neves AC, Correr- Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Influence of the curing method on the post-polymerization shrinkage stress of a composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16:266-270
- 30 Christensen GJ. Longevity of posterior tooth dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:201-203
- 31 BorgesBC, Borges JS, Araújo LS, Machado CT, dos Santos AJ, Pinheiro IV. Update on nonsurgical, ultraconservative approaches to treat effectively non-cavitated caries lesions in permanent teeth. Eur J Dent 2011;5:229-236