CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2011; 05(04): 478-485
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698922
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Bonding All-Ceramic Restorations with Two Resins Cement Techniques: A Clinical Report of Three-Year Follow-Up

Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta
a   Sao Paulo State University-UNESP, Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
,
Eduardo Passos Rocha
a   Sao Paulo State University-UNESP, Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
,
Erika Oliveira de Almeida
a   Sao Paulo State University-UNESP, Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
,
Amilcar Chagas Freitas Junior
a   Sao Paulo State University-UNESP, Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
,
Ana Paula Martini
a   Sao Paulo State University-UNESP, Faculty of Dentistry of Araçatuba, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Ceramics have been widely used for esthetic and functional improvements. The resin cement is the material of choice for bonding ceramics to dental substrate and it can also dictate the final esthetic appearance and strength of the restoration. The correct use of the wide spectrum of resin luting agents available depends on the dental tooth substrate. This article presents three-year clinical results of a 41 years old female patient B.H.C complaining about her unattractive smile. Two all-ceramic crowns and two laminates veneers were placed in the maxillary incisors and cemented with a self-adhesive resin luting cement and conventional resin luting cement, respectively. After a three-year follow-up, the restorations and cement/teeth interface were clinically perfect with no chipping, fractures or discoloration. Proper use of different resin luting cements shows clinical appropriate behavior after a three-year follow-up. Self-adhesive resin luting cement may be used for cementing all-ceramic crowns with high predictability of success, mainly if there is a large dentin surface available for bonding and no enamel at the finish line. Otherwise, conventional resin luting agent should be used for achieving an adequate bonding strength to enamel. (Eur J Dent 2011;5:478-485)

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Füchsbrunner A, Chen HY, Hickel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:192-198.
  • 2 Mitchell CA, Abbariki M, Orr JF. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival rate and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns. Dent Mater 2000;16:198- 206.
  • 3 Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28:163-177.
  • 4 Peumans M, Hikita K, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P & Van Meerbeek B. Bond durability of composite luting agents to ceramic when exposed to longterm thermocycling. Oper Dent 2007;32:372-379.
  • 5 Chen Y-W, Raigrodski AJ. A conservative approach for treating young adult patients with porcelain laminate veneers. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20:223-238.
  • 6 Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH & Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:161-167.
  • 7 Pospiech P. All-ceramic crowns: bonding or cementing? Clin Oral Investig 2002;6:189-197.
  • 8 Ibarra G, Johnson GH, Geurtsen W, Vargas MA. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement. Dent Mater 2007;23:218-225.
  • 9 Yazici AR, Çelik Ç, Özgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. Bond strength of different adhesive systems to dental hard tissues. Oper Dent 2007;32:166-172.
  • 10 Pivetta MR, Moura SK, Barroso LP, Lascala AC, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Grande RH. Bond strength and etching pattern of adhesive systems to enamel: effects of conditioning time and enamel preparation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20:322-336.
  • 11 Burke FJ. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 1995; 26:293-300.
  • 12 Burke FJ, Fleming GJ, Nathanson D, Marquis PM. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:7- 22.
  • 13 Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990;21:823-831.
  • 14 Burke FJ, Watts DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int 1994;25:335- 340.
  • 15 De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963- 991.
  • 16 Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R, Handel G. Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems. Dent Mater 2004;20:191-197.
  • 17 Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250-257.
  • 18 Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodontics 1991;4:17-23.
  • 19 Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Toksavul S, Vallittu PK. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:128-133.
  • 20 Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthetic Dent 2004;92:265-273.
  • 21 Reich SM, Wichmann M, Frankenberger R, Zajc D. Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of three resin cements to a machinable feldspatic ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Applied Biomater 2005;74:740-746.
  • 22 Soares CJ, Soares PV, Pereira JC, Fonseca RB. Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:224-235.
  • 23 Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthetic Dent 2003;89:268-274.
  • 24 Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Sindel J. Repair strength of etched vs silicacoated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations. Oper Dent 2000;25:209-215.
  • 25 Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int 1995;26:95-110.
  • 26 Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2007;32:179-184.
  • 27 Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P & Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71-80.
  • 28 Chu SJ, Tan J H-P, Stappert CFJ, Tarnow DP. Gingival zenith positions and levels of the maxillary anterior dentition. Esthet Restor Dent 2009;21:113-121.