Cephalometric Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway in Snoring and Non-Snoring Patients

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To compare the skeletal and the airway structures of the non-snoring individuals with simple snoring and patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: The first group consisted of 20 simple snoring cases (mean age: 37.5±8.05 years; max: 50 years, min: 21 years), the second group consisted of 20 OSA cases (mean age: 40.0±8.28 years; max: 54 years, min: 27 years) and the third group consisted of 20 individuals without any respiration problems (mean age: 29.6±3.20 years; max: 35 years, min: 24 years). In the cephalometric films, 4 skeletal and 14 airway space measurements were done. The control group and the study groups were compared using the Dunnett t test, and the groups with snoring problems were compared using the Bonferroni test. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups in skeletal measurements. The OSA and simple snoring groups showed no significant differences in airway measurements. The OSA group showed significantly increased soft palate angulation when compared with the control group (P<.05). Soft palate length, soft palate thickness and soft palate height were significantly higher in the OSA samples than in the control group (P<.001). Pharyngeal spaces in the soft palate area had the significantly lowest values in the OSA group. Inferior pharyngeal space distances in the control group were greater than in both study groups. The OSA group showed the most inferiorly positioned hyoid bone and the difference between OSA and control groups was significant (P<.01). Conclusions: The decreased airway dimension in the soft palate area due to increased soft palate volume must be taken into consideration in treatment planning of OSA patients. (Eur J Dent 2011;5:84-88)

Key words:

Snoring - OSA - Airway

• REFERENCES

• 1 Jureyda S, Shucard DW. Obstructive sleep apnea—an overview of the disorder and its consequences. Semin Orthod 2004;10:63-72.
• 2 Mozer NJ, Phillips B, Berry DTR, et al. What is hypopnea anyway? Chest 1994;105:426-428.
• 3 Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, et al. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1230-1235.
• 4 Tsai HH, Ho CY, Lee PL, Tan CT. Cephalometric analysis of nonobese snorers either with or without obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Angle Orthod 2007;77:1054-1061.
• 5 Lowe AA, Ono T, Ferguson KA, Pae EK, DDS, Ryan CF, Fleetham JA. Cephalometric comparisons of craniofacial and upper airway structure by skeletal subtype and gender in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110:653-664.
• 6 Schwartz AR, Eisele DW, Hari A, Testerman R, Erickson D, Smith PL. Electrical stimulation of the lingual musculature in obstructive sleep apnea. J Appl Physiol 1996;81:643–652.
• 7 Shelton KE, Woodson H, Gay S, Suratt PM. Pharyngeal fat in obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148:462–466.
• 8 Battagel JM, L'Estrange PR. The cephalometric morphology of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Eur J Orthod 1996;18:557–569.
• 9 Zucconi M, Ferini-Strambi L, Palazzi S, Orena C, Zonta S, Smirne S. Habitual snoring with and without obstructive sleep apnoea: the importance of cephalometric variables. Thorax 1992;47:157–161.
• 10 Broughton RJ. Polysomnography: Principles and applications in sleep and arousal disorders. In: Niedemeyer E, Lopes da silva F (eds). Electroencephalography: Basic Principles. Clinical Applications and Related Fields (ed 2). Baltimore, MD: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1987, 687-724.
• 11 Meoli AL, Casey KR, Clark RW, et al. Hypopnea in sleepdisordered breathing in adults. Sleep 2001;24:469-470.
• 12 Lowe AA, Santamafia JD, Fleetham JA, Price C. Facial morphology and obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986;90:484-491 13. Jamieson A, Gdilleminault C, Partinen M, Quera-Salva MA. Obstructive sleep apneic patients have craniomandibular abnormalities. Sleep 1986;9:469-477.