CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2007; 01(01): 018-020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698306
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Impacted Teeth and Mandibular Fracture

Murat Metin
a   Dental Hospital. Bursa, Turkey
,
İsmail Şener
b   Dental Hospital. Samsun, Turkey
,
Mustafa Tek
c   Dental Hospital. Karşıyaka-İzmir, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: In this retrospective study, we measured the relationship between the presences of impacted or unerupted teeth in the mandible and mandibular fractures.

Methods: The records and radiographs of 41 patients with mandibular fracture associated with impacted or unerupted teeth were examined. The presence of impacted or unerupted teeth were assessed for each patient and related to the occurrence of fractures of mandible.

Results: Patients with fracture in the impacted or unerupted teeth area present had a 1,73 times greater chance of an mandibular fracture than patients with no fracture in the impacted or unerupted teeth area. There was a statistically significant variation in the risk for a mandibular fracture depending on impacted or unerupted teeth presence (x2=5.29, P< .05).

Conclusion: The presence of an impacted or unerupted teeth significantly increases the likelihood of an mandibular fracture. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:18-20)

 
  • References

  • 1 Banks P. Killey’s fractures of the mandible. 4th ed. London: Wright; 1991: 1
  • 2 Rudderman RH, Mullen RL. Biomechanics of the facial skeleton.. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19: 11-29
  • 3 Amaratunga NAS. A comparative study of the clinical aspects of edentulous and dentulous mandibular fractures.. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 46: 3-6
  • 4 Safdar N, Meechan JG. Relationship between fractures of the mandibular angle and the presence and state of eruption of the lower third molar.. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1995; 79: 680-684
  • 5 Tevepaugh DB, Dodson TB. Are mandibular third molars a risk factor for angle fractures? A retrospective cohort study.. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 53: 646-649
  • 6 Lee JT, Dodson TB. The effect of mandibular third molar presence and position on the risk of an angle fracture.. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 394-398
  • 7 Peterson L, Ellis E, Hupp JR, Tucker MR. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The CV Mosby Company, St Louis, Washington, Toronto. 2003; 223
  • 8 Reitzik M, Lownie JF, Cleaton-Jones P, Austin J. Experimental fractures of monkey mandibles.. Int J Oral Surg 1978; 7: 100-103
  • 9 Dodson TB. Cross-sectional area of the mandible: Discussion.. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 693-695
  • 10 Fuselier J, Ellis EE, 3rd Dodson TB. Do mandibular third molars alter the risk of angle fracture?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60: 514-518
  • 11 Libersa P, Roze D, Cachart T, Libersa JC. Immediate and Late Mandibular Fractures after Third Molar Removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60: 163-165
  • 12 Perry PA, Goldberg MH. Late mandibular fracture after third molar surgery: A survey of Connecticut oral and maxillofacial surgeons. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 858-861
  • 13 Krimmel M, Reinert S. Mandibular fracture after third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 58: 1110-1112
  • 14 Huelke DF, Burdi AR, Eyman CE. Association between mandibular fractures and site of trauma, dentition, and age. J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv 1962; 20: 478-481
  • 15 Halazonetis JA. The ‘weak’ regions of the mandible. Br J Oral Surg 1968; 6: 37-48