The Effect of Framework Design on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported FPDs: A 3-D FEM Study

Objectives: The biomechanical behavior of the superstructure plays an important role in the functional longevity of dental implants. However, information about the influence of framework design on stresses transmitted to the implants and supporting tissues is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of framework designs on stress distribution at the supporting bone and supporting implants.

Methods: In this study, the three-dimensional (3D) finite element stress analysis method was used. Three types of 3D mathematical models simulating three different framework designs for implant- supported 3-unit posterior fixed partial dentures were prepared with supporting structures. Convex (1), concave (2), and conventional (3) pontic framework designs were simulated. A 300-N static vertical occlusal load was applied on the node at the center of occlusal surface of the pontic to calculate the stress distributions. As a second condition, frameworks were directly loaded to evaluate the effect of the framework design clearly. The Solidworks/Cosmosworks structural analysis programs were used for finite element modeling/analysis.

Results: The analysis of the von Mises stress values revealed that maximum stress concentrations were located at the loading areas for all models. The pontic side marginal edges of restorations and the necks of implants were other stress concentration regions. There was no clear difference among models when the restorations were loaded at occlusal surfaces. When the veneering porcelain was removed, and load was applied directly to the framework, there was a clear increase in stress concentration with a concave design on supporting implants and bone structure.

Conclusions: The present study showed that the use of a concave design in the pontic frameworks of fixed partial dentures increases the von Mises stress levels on implant abutments and supporting bone structure. However, the veneering porcelain element reduces the effect of the framework and compensates for design weaknesses. (Eur J Dent 2010;4:374-382)

Keywords

Framework design - Implant supported fixed partial denture - 3-D FEM - Pontic design

• REFERENCES

• 1 Burke FJ, Qualtrough AJ, Hale RW. Dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns: current status. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 455-460
• 2 Fleming GJ, Nolan L, Harris JJ. The in-vitro clinical failure of all-ceramic crowns and the connector area of fixed partial dentures: the influence of interfacial surface roughness. J Dent 2005; 33: 405-412
• 3 Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Uhlmann DR. Elasticity, anelasticity, and strength. In Kingery WD. editors In: Introduction to ceramics. New York: Wiley; 1976: 769-805
• 4 O' Brien WJ. Dental Materials and their selection. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Pub Co, Inc.; 1997: 287-302
• 5 Tsumita M, Kokubo Y, Ohtsuka T. Influences of core frame design on the mechanical strength of posterior all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part 1. Two dimensional finite element analyses. Tsurumi University Dental Journal 2005; 31: 205-212
• 6 Fleming GJ, Dickens M, Thomas LJ, Harris JJ. The in vitro failure of all-ceramic crowns and the connector area of fixed partial dentures using bilayered ceramic specimens: the influence of core to dentin thickness ratio. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 771-777
• 7 Chen J, Xu L. A finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint. J Biomech Eng 1994; 116: 401-407
• 8 Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 709-715
• 9 Magne P, Perakis N. Stress distribution of inlay-anchored adhesive fixed partial dentures: A finite element analysis of the influence of restorative materials and abutment preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 516-527
• 10 Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Rationalization of incisor shape: experimental-numerical analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 345-355
• 11 Kelly JR, Tesk JA. Sorensen JA. Failure of all ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1253-1258
• 12 Decock V, De KNayer, De JABoever, Dent M. 18-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 331-340
• 13 Goodacre CJ, Kan JK, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 537-552
• 14 Williams KR, Watson CJ, Murphy WM, Scott J, Gregory M, Sinobad D. Finite element analysis of fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 563-570
• 15 Eraslan O, Sevimay M, Usumez A, Eskitascýoðlu G. Effects of cantilever design and material on stress distribution in fixed partial dentures - a finite element analysis. J Oral Rehab 2005; 32: 273-278
• 16 Nageim AlH, Durka F, Morgan W, Williams D. Structural mechanics loads, analysis, design and, materials. 6th ed. Malaysia: Pearson Edu Ltd.; 2003: 144-308
• 17 Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, Soykan E, Unsal E. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 144-150
• 18 Sevimay M, Usumez A, Eskitascioglu G. The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a threedimensional finite-element study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 73: 140-147
• 19 Beer FP, DeWolf JT, Johnston ER. Mechanics of materials. 4th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Int; 2005: 360-378
• 20 Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2667-2682
• 21 Akça K, Iplikçioðlu H. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 722-730
• 22 Timoshenko S, Young DH. Elements of strength of materials. 5th ed. Florence: Wadsworth; 1968: 377-9
• 23 Ugural AC, Fenster SK. Advanced strength and applied elasticity. 4th ed. New York: Prentice-Hall; 2003: 155-157
• 24 Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 558-567