Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · AJP Rep 2019; 09(04): e328-e336
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697656
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Trend of Cesarean Section Rates and Correlations with Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of Thai Universal Coverage Scheme Data

Tippawan Liabsuetrakul 
1   Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
,
Jarawee Sukmanee
1   Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
,
Jutatip Thungthong
2   National Health Security Office (NHSO) Thailand, Chaengwattana Road, Lak Si, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Pisake Lumbiganon
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

04 May 2019

16 July 2019

Publication Date:
30 October 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives The main purpose of this article is to estimate the trend and projection of cesarean section rates (CSRs) and explore correlations between CSRs with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, namely maternal mortality ratios (MMRs), rates of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), neonatal mortality rates (NMRs), and birth asphyxia per 1,000 live births across all regions of Thailand.

Study design A secondary analysis of the hospital-based database of pregnant women and newborns under the Thai Universal Coverage Scheme between January 2009 and December 2017 was conducted.

Results Overall annual CSR significantly increased from 23.2% in 2009 to 32.5% in 2017. With the same rate of increase, the CSR of 59.1% was projected by the year 2030 that could be reduced to 30.0% if an annual rate of CS reduction of 1% was assumed using Joinpoint regression. The increasing CSRs were significantly correlated with higher MMRs (r= 0.20, p = 0.03) and birth asphyxia (r= 0.39, p < 0.001). The correlation trends were similar when the analyses were stratified by year in the majority of years. Overall correlations between CSRs and rates of PPH or NMRs were not statistically significant.

Conclusion CSRs in Thailand continuously increased and were correlated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. More effort at the national level to reduce unnecessary CS is urgently required.

Keywords

cesarean section rates - maternal and perinatal outcomes - trend - Universal Coverage Scheme

Disclosure of Any Source of Financial Support or Funding

All authors declare no conflict of interest. No funding sources were involved in this secondary analysis.


Contributions to Authorship

All authors participated in the concept of the study. TL obtained the necessary permissions for data utilization, and participated in data analysis and interpretation, and drafting the manuscript. JS participated in data analysis and interpretation. JT participated in data extraction and management. PL helped with data interpretation. All authors reviewed the draft of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript for submission.


Details of Ethical Approval

A study protocol of secondary analysis was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University with the reference number of REC 60–439–18–1 (Exempt determination), date of approval on 27 November 2017.


 

  • References

  • 1 Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? whose benefits?. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29 (01) 7-18
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N. , et al; WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health 2015; 3 (05) e260-e270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 5 National Statistical Office and United Nations Children's Fund. Thailand multiple indicator cluster survey 2015–2016, final report. Bangkok: National Statistical Office and United Nations Children's Fund; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Souza JP, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P. , et al; WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health. BMC Med 2010; 8: 71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gülmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG 2016; 123 (05) 745-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D. , et al; WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006; 367 (9525): 1819-1829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cristina Rossi A, Mullin P. The etiology of maternal mortality in developed countries: a systematic review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285 (06) 1499-1503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kupari M, Talola N, Luukkaala T, Tihtonen K. Does an increased cesarean section rate improve neonatal outcome in term pregnancies?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 294 (01) 41-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sakunphanit T. Universal health care coverage through pluralistic approaches: experience from Thailand. Bangkok: International Labour Organization; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Tangcharoensathien V, Witthayapipopsakul W, Panichkriangkrai W, Patcharanarumol W, Mills A. Health systems development in Thailand: a solid platform for successful implementation of universal health coverage. Lancet 2018; 391 (10126): 1205-1223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Paek SC, Meemon N, Wan TTH. Thailand's Universal Coverage Scheme and its impact on health-seeking behavior. Springerplus 2016; 5 (01) 1952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kongsri S, Limwattananon S, Sirilak S, Prakongsai P, Tangcharoensathien V. Equity of access to and utilization of reproductive health services in Thailand: national Reproductive Health Survey data, 2006 and 2009. Reprod Health Matters 2011; 19 (37) 86-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Patcharanarumol W, Panichkriangkrai W, Sommanuttaweechai A, Hanson K, Wanwong Y, Tangcharoensathien V. Strategic purchasing and health system efficiency: a comparison of two financing schemes in Thailand. PLoS One 2018; 13 (04) e0195179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kim MK, Lee SM, Bae S-H. , et al. Socioeconomic status can affect pregnancy outcomes and complications, even with a universal healthcare system. Int J Equity Health 2018; 17 (01) 2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Teerawattananon Y, Tangcharoensathien V. Designing a reproductive health services package in the universal health insurance scheme in Thailand: match and mismatch of need, demand and supply. Health Policy Plan 2004; 19 (Suppl. 01) i31-i39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rosa W. , Ed. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In: A New Era in Global Health [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2017. [cited 2018 Nov 30]. Available from: http://connect.springerpub.com/lookup/doi/10.1891/9780826190123.ap02
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Charoenboon C, Srisupundit K, Tongsong T. Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287 (01) 47-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One 2016; 11 (02) e0148343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Giang HTN, Ulrich S, Tran HT, Bechtold-Dalla Pozza S. Monitoring and interventions are needed to reduce the very high caesarean section rates in Vietnam. Acta Paediatr 2018; 107 (12) 2109-2114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Tapia V, Betran AP, Gonzales GF. Caesarean section in Peru: analysis of trends using the Robson classification system. PLOS ONE 2016; 11 (02) e0148138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yamasmit W, Chaithongwongwatthana S. Attitude and preference of Thai pregnant women towards mode of delivery. J Med Assoc Thai 2012; 95 (05) 619-624
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kovavisarach E, Ruttanapan K. Self-preferred route of delivery of Thai obstetricians and gynecologists. J Med Assoc Thai 2016; 99 (Suppl. 02) S84-S90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mariani GL, Vain NE. The rising incidence and impact of non-medically indicated pre-labour cesarean section in Latin America. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 24 (01) 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Santas G, Santas F. Trends of caesarean section rates in Turkey. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 38 (05) 658-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Norum J, Svee TE. Caesarean section rates and activity-based funding in Northern Norway: a model-based study using the World Health Organization's recommendation. Obstet Gynecol Int 2018; 2018: 6764258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Maeda E, Ishihara O, Tomio J. , et al. Cesarean section rates and local resources for perinatal care in Japan: a nationwide ecological study using the national database of health insurance claims. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2018; 44 (02) 208-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E. , et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Oct 10]; Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lesieur E, Blanc J, Loundou A. , et al. Teaching and performing audits on caesarean delivery reduce the caesarean delivery rate. PLoS One 2018; 13 (08) e0202475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 Oct 16]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/monitoring/maternal-mortality-2015/en/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 O'Dwyer V, Hogan JL, Farah N, Kennelly MM, Fitzpatrick C, Turner MJ. Maternal mortality and the rising cesarean rate. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012; 116 (02) 162-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ford JB, Roberts CL, Simpson JM, Vaughan J, Cameron CA. Increased postpartum hemorrhage rates in Australia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007; 98 (03) 237-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Mehrabadi A, Liu S, Bartholomew S. , et al; Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System (Public Health Agency of Canada). Temporal trends in postpartum hemorrhage and severe postpartum hemorrhage in Canada from 2003 to 2010. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014; 36 (01) 21-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Rueangchainikhom W, Srisuwan S, Prommas S, Sarapak S. Risk factors for primary postpartum hemorrhage in Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2009; 92 (12) 1586-1590
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ngwenya S. Postpartum hemorrhage: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in a low-resource setting. Int J Womens Health 2016; 8: 647-650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Al-Zirqi I, Vangen S, Forsén L, Stray-Pedersen B. Effects of onset of labor and mode of delivery on severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201 (03) 273.e1-273.e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM. , et al; World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet 2010; 375 (9713): 490-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Zhao Y, Zhang J, Zamora J. , et al. Increases in caesarean delivery rates and change of perinatal outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a hospital-level analysis of two WHO surveys. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2017; 31 (04) 251-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Chumpathong S, Sirithanetbhol S, Salakij B, Visalyaputra S, Parakkamodom S, Wataganara T. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing cesarean section: a 10-year retrospective study from a single tertiary care center: anesthetic point of view. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29 (24) 4096-4100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar