Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Joints 2018; 06(04): 228-231
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697615
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Treatment of Distal Biceps Ruptures: An Overview

Simone Cerciello
1   Ortopedia, Casa di Cura Villa Betania, Rome, Italy
2   Ortopedia, Marrelli Hospital, Crotone, Italy
,
Enrico Visonà 
3   Ortopedia 1–Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
,
Katia Corona
4   Dipartimento di Statistica, Università degli Studi del Molise, Campobasso, Italy
,
Paulo Roberto Ribeiro Filho
5   Orthopedic Department, Hospital Nossa Senhora dos Prazeres, Santa Catarina, Brazil
,
Stefano Carbone
6   Ortopedia, Ospedale san Camillo de Lellis, Rieti, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 September 2017

07 August 2019

Publication Date:
11 October 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Traumatic lesions of the distal biceps brachii are uncommon. They often result from rapid elbow flexion against resistance. Conservative treatment is only indicated in low-demanding patient and in those who have severe comorbidities. Regarding the surgical approach, two options are available: the single- and the double-incision techniques. The former has been the first to be described and was associated with significant rate of neurologic complications. The second showed less frequent neurologic lesions, but considerable rate of heterotopic ossifications with reduced forearm movement. The choice of fixation device is another important issue. Cortical buttons, transosseous repair, suture anchors, and interference screws have shown satisfactory outcomes. However, cortical buttons have the best mechanical properties. Although a lack of high methodological quality studies emerges in the available literature, three recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis show interesting findings. Surgical reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii yields satisfactory clinical outcomes both with the single- and double-incision techniques. Higher prevalence of nerve injuries is associated with the single-incision techniques, whereas higher prevalence of heterotopic ossification is reported with double-incision techniques. Thus far, there is no sufficient evidence to support one option and the choice is mainly based on surgeon's experience.

Keywords

distal biceps - rupture - double-incision technique - heterotopic ossification
 

  • References

  • 1 Safran MR, Graham SM. Distal biceps tendon ruptures: incidence, demographics, and the effect of smoking. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (404) 275-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 D'Alessandro DF, Shields Jr CL, Tibone JE, Chandler RW. Repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures in athletes. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21 (01) 114-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Miyamoto RG, Elser F, Millett PJ. Distal biceps tendon injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (11) 2128-2138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Leighton MM, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach Jr BR. Distal biceps brachii repair. Results in dominant and nondominant extremities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (317) 114-121
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Seiler III JG, Parker LM, Chamberland PD, Sherbourne GM, Carpenter WA. The distal biceps tendon. Two potential mechanisms involved in its rupture: arterial supply and mechanical impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995; 4 (03) 149-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Visuri T, Lindholm H. Bilateral distal biceps tendon avulsions with use of anabolic steroids. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26 (08) 941-944
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Morrey BF, Askew LJ, An KN, Dobyns JH. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (03) 418-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Baker BE, Bierwagen D. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. Operative versus non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (03) 414-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dobbie RP. Avulsion of the lower biceps brachii tendon: analysis of fifty-one previously unreported cases. Am J Surg 1941; 51: 662-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Freeman CR, McCormick KR, Mahoney D, Baratz M, Lubahn JD. Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (10) 2329-2334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 El-Hawary R, Macdermid JC, Faber KJ, Patterson SD, King GJ. Distal biceps tendon repair: comparison of surgical techniques. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28 (03) 496-502
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Meherin JM, Kilgore ES. The treatment of ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Am J Surg 1960; 99: 636-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Boyd HB, Anderson LD. A method for reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Bone Joint Surg 1961; 43: 1041-1043
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Failla JM, Amadio PC, Morrey BF, Beckenbaugh RD. Proximal radioulnar synostosis after repair of distal biceps brachii rupture by the two-incision technique. Report of four cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (253) 133-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Karunakar MA, Cha P, Stern PJ. Distal biceps ruptures. A followup of Boyd and Anderson repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (363) 100-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Davison BL, Engber WD, Tigert LJ. Long term evaluation of repaired distal biceps brachii tendon ruptures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (333) 186-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Morrey BF. Tendon injuries about the elbow. In: Morrey BF, Sanchez-Sotelo J. , eds. The Elbow and Its Disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993: 492-504
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Kelly EW, Morrey BF, O'Driscoll SW. Complications of repair of the distal biceps tendon with the modified two-incision technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82 (11) 1575-1581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sethi P, Obopilwe E, Rincon L, Miller S, Mazzocca A. Biomechanical evaluation of distal biceps reconstruction with cortical button and interference screw fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19 (01) 53-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Siebenlist S, Buchholz A, Zapf J. , et al. Double intramedullary cortical button versus suture anchors for distal biceps tendon repair: a biomechanical comparison. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (03) 926-933
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pereira DS, Kvitne RS, Liang M, Giacobetti FB, Ebramzadeh E. Surgical repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (03) 432-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lemos SE, Ebramzedeh E, Kvitne RS. A new technique: in vitro suture anchor fixation has superior yield strength to bone tunnel fixation for distal biceps tendon repair. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (02) 406-410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Idler CS, Montgomery III WH, Lindsey DP, Badua PA, Wynne GF, Yerby SA. Distal biceps tendon repair: a biomechanical comparison of intact tendon and 2 repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (06) 968-974
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Chavan PR, Duquin TR, Bisson LJ. Repair of the ruptured distal biceps tendon: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (08) 1618-1624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Watson JN, Moretti VM, Schwindel L, Hutchinson MR. Repair techniques for acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (24) 2086-2090
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Amin NH, Volpi A, Lynch TS. , et al. Complications of distal biceps tendon repair: a meta-analysis of single-incision versus double-incision surgical technique. Orthop J Sports Med 2016; 4 (10) 2325967116668137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dunphy TR, Hudson J, Batech M, Acevedo DC, Mirzayan R. Surgical treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures: an analysis of complications in 784 surgical repairs. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (13) 3020-3029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar