An Unusual Complication after Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

One-stage or two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in periprosthetic joint infections has been at the center of scientific debate for many years. As regards two-stage revision TKA, cement spacers have a good infection control rate with successful results reportable up to 96%, though some studies describe related spacer complications such as stiffness and loss of bone stock. We report a case of a fracture close to the antibiotic-loaded cement spacer in a 74-year-old female patient. Due to the blood tests and high risk of infection, we performed a hybrid external fixator. Six months after the surgery, X-rays did not show signs of fracture consolidation and nonunion was considered as an impending complication; therefore, the decision was made to perform tumor-like total knee arthroplasty. The postoperative evolution was satisfactory and return to daily activity without pain. At the 5-year follow-up, the patient showed a good score of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and a range of motion from 0 to 90° without pain. The X-rays did not show signs of mobilization, dislocation, recurrence of infection, or other complications.

Keywords

fracture - spacer - tumor-type prosthesis

• References

• 1 Solarino G, Abate A, Vicenti G, Spinarelli A, Piazzolla A, Moretti B. Reducing periprosthetic joint infection: what really counts?. Joints 2016; 3 (04) 208-214
• 2 Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E. , et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (01) 45-51
• 3 Mazzucchelli L, Rosso F, Marmotti A, Bonasia DE, Bruzzone M, Rossi R. The use of spacers (static and mobile) in infection knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2015; 8 (04) 373-382
• 4 Haleem AA, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD. Mid-term to long-term followup of two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428) 35-39
• 5 Park SJ, Song EK, Seon JK, Yoon TR, Park GH. Comparison of static and mobile antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2010; 34 (08) 1181-1186
• 6 Struelens B, Claes S, Bellemans J. Spacer-related problems in two-stage revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2013; 79 (04) 422-426
• 7 Iarikov D, Demian H, Rubin D, Alexander J, Nambiar S. Choice and doses of antibacterial agents for cement spacers in treatment of prosthetic joint infections: review of published studies. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55 (11) 1474-1480
• 8 Toogood PA, Vail TP. Periprosthetic fractures: a common problem with a disproportionately high impact on healthcare resources. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (10) 1688-1691
• 9 Wan Z, Karim A, Momaya A, Incavo SJ, Mathis KB. Preformed articulating knee spacers in 2-stage total knee revision arthroplasty: minimum 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (08) 1469-1473
• 10 Choi HR, Malchau H, Bedair H. Are prosthetic spacers safe to use in 2-stage treatment for infected total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (08) 1474-1479
• 11 Nauth A, Nousiainen MT, Jenkinson R, Hall J. The treatment of periprosthetic fractures. Instr Course Lect 2015; 64: 161-173
• 12 Leino OK, Lempainen L, Virolainen P, Sarimo J, Pölönen T, Mäkelä KT. Operative results of periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur in a single academic unit. Scand J Surg 2015; 104 (03) 200-207
• 13 Cannon SR. The use of megaprosthesis in the treatment of periprosthetic knee fractures. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (10) 1945-1950