Download PDF
Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2009; 03(03): 178-184
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697429
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Effect of Multiple Consecutive Adhesive Coatings on Microleakage of Class V Cavities

Authors

  • Hacer Deniz Arisu

    a   Lecturer, University of Gazi, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics, Ankara, Turkey

  • Evrim Eliguzeloglu

    b   Specialist, University of Gazi, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics, Ankara, Turkey

  • Mine Betul Uctasli

    c   Assistant Professor, University of Gazi, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics, Ankara, Turkey

  • Huma Omurlu

    d   Professor, University of Gazi, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics, Ankara, Turkey

  • Emin Turkoz

    d   Professor, University of Gazi, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics, Ankara, Turkey
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 October 2019 (online)

Also available at
 PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of multiple consecutive adhesive coatings of a one-step self-etch adhesive on microleakage of Class V cavities.

Methods: Standardized box shaped Class V cavities were prepared onto the buccal side of forty five non-carious human premolar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups of fifteen teeth in each and restored as: Group I- one-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil S3, Kuraray Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) was applied according to the manufacturer�s instructions, Group II- two consecutive same one-step self-etch adhesive application was performed, and Group III- three consecutive same one-step self-etch adhesive application was performed. After the adhesive applications light curing unit was activated for 20 seconds and the cavities were restored with a composite resin. The restorations were finished with aluminum oxide discs and the specimens were stored in water at room temperature for 24 hours before they were immersed in 2% methylene blue for 48 hours. The dye penetration was examined under a stereomicroscope and the asymtotic significance were analysed with Kruskall Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests and dentin-enamel margins were compared with each other with Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.

Results: The microleakage at the dentinal margins of Class V cavities were significantly decreased with two (Group II) and three (Group III) consecutive adhesive applications (P<.05). There was no significant difference between Group I, Group II and Group III at the enamel margins (P<.05). The microleakage at the dentinal margins were significantly higher than the enamel margins in Group I and Group II but in Group III there was no statistically significant difference (P<.05).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it may be concluded that three consecutive applications of the one-step self-etch adhesive resin provided better sealing than the one coat of adhesive resin at the dentinal margins of Class V cavities. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:178-184)

Key words:

Dentin bonding - Microleakage - Self-etch adhesive - Class V cavity
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y. Buonocure memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
  • 2 Ben-Amar A, Pilo P, Shapinko E, Lewinstein I. A microleakage study of single-bottle adhesives applied to enamel and cementum and aged by both occlusal loading and thermocycling. Quint Int 2005;36:177-182.
  • 3 Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990;69: 36-39.
  • 4 Swift EJ Jr, Triolo PT Jr, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 1996;9:100-104.
  • 5 Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 16;329-334.
  • 6 Brackett WW, Ito S, Nishitani Y, Haisch LD, Pashley DH. The microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel. Oper Dent 2006;31:332-337.
  • 7 Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing � a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 2003;16:6-12.
  • 8 Osoiro R, Toledano M, De Leonardi G, Tay F. Microleakage and interfacial morphology of self etching adhesives in Class V resin composite restorations. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003;66:399- 409.
  • 9 Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. No-bottle vs multiple bottle dentin adhesives- a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001;17:373-380.
  • 10 Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in one adhesive on dentin bonding. J Dent 2002;30:83-90.
  • 11 Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-1658.
  • 12 Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Monomer solvent phase separation in one step self etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005;84:183-188.
  • 13 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371-382.
  • 14 King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Hoshimoto M, Ito S, Brackett WW, Garcia-Godoy F, Sunico M. Conversion of one-step to two-step self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended applications. Am J Dent 2005;18:126-134.
  • 15 Brackett WW, Ito S, Tay FR, Haisch LD, Pashley DH. Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching resins: Effect of hydrophobic layer. Oper Dent 2005;30:733-738.
  • 16 Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, Waller JL, Pashley DH. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:133-141.
  • 17 Arisu HD, Uctasli MB, Eliguzeloglu E, Ozcan S, Omurlu H. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations. Oper Dent 2008;33:135-141.
  • 18 Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical relevance of laboratory fatigue studies. J Dent 1994;22:97-102.
  • 19 Raskin A, D�Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Dejou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:295-308.
  • 20 Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: A review. Oper Dent 1997;22:173-185.
  • 21 Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992;20:3-10.
  • 22 Demarco FF, Ramos OLV, Mota CS, Formolo E, Justino LM. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum. Oper Dent 2001;26:253-259.
  • 23 Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, Millia E. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16;128-135.
  • 24 Piva E, Meinhardt L, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Dyes for caries detection: influence on composite and compomer microleakage. Clin Oral Investig 2002;6:244-248.
  • 25 el-Din AKN, Abd el-Mohsen MM. Effect of changing application times on adhesive systems bond strengths. Am J Dent 2002;15:321-324.
  • 26 Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-440.
  • 27 Burke FJ, McCaughey D. The four generations of dentin bonding. Am J Dent 1995;8:88-92.
  • 28 Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:17-24.
  • 29 Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH, Liu P. Microleakage of multistep and simplified step systems. Am J Dent 1996;9:269-272.
  • 30 Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 2000;79:812-817.
  • 31 Saunders WP, Saunders EN. Microleakage of bonding agents with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent 1996;9:34-36.
  • 32 Cvitko E, Denehy G, Boyer DB. Effect of matrix systems and polymerization techniques on microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 1992;5:321-323.
  • 33 De Munk J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-132.
  • 34 Hashimoto M, Sano H, Yoshida E, Hori M, Kaga M, Oguchi H, Pashley DH. Effects of multiple adhesive coatings on dentin bonding. Oper Dent 2004;29:416-423.
  • 35 Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effect of double application or the application of a hydrophobic layer for improved efficacy of one step self etch systems in enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2008;33:564-570.
  • 36 Tay FR, Pashley DH, King NM, Carvalho RM, Tsai J, Lai SCN, Marquezini L, Jr. Aggressiveness of self-etch adhesives on unground enamel. Oper Dent 2004;29:309-316.
  • 37 Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary selfetching adhesives. Part II: Etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001;17:430-444.
  • 38 Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary selfetching adhesives. I: Depth of penetration beyond smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308.
  • 39 Toledano M, Proenca JP, Erhardt MCG, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Osorio R, Tay FR. Increases in dentin bond strength if doubling application time of an acetone containing one step adhesive. Oper Dent 2007;32:133-137.
  • 40 Ogata M, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Effect of dentin primer application on regional bond strength to cervical wedge-shaped cavity walls. Oper Dent 1999;24:81-88.
  • 41 Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1997;10:66-70.